By indigo_jones via Flickr under Creative Commons license
During game between Liverpool and Wolves, Andy Gray and Richard Keys were playing the game as they know it when they exchanged comments about the competence, or rather claimed incompetence of assistant referee (aka ‘linesman’) and their off-air conversation was leaked to the press.
In spite of the efforts of organisations which combat all forms of prejudice and legislation against discriminatory practice, football remains dominated by a hegemonic masculinity which devalues women and takes for granted the acceptability of sexist discourse and gender discriminatory cultural practices. Referees are used to negative comments but in this case the criticism was framed by a version of masculinity which targets women as inherently incapable of understanding the rules of sport, especially football.
Hostility may be expressed in the language of homophobia, racism, ethnocentrism and sexism, but men are not targeted because they are men, whereas in cases like that of Sian Massey, her competence is called into question, even though she in fact made a good call and clearly is very well aware of the offside rule, just because she is a woman and in football this is par for the course.
Men's control
Heather Rabbatts of Millwall argued on BBC Five Live that, although there was a strong case for more women referees, when they are appointed they can expect the same abuse as the men who do the job. It is not identical though. There is abuse, but in the case of women the abuse takes particular forms, which are expressions of men’s control of the game and the marginalisation, and even the exclusion, of women.
There have been massive culture shifts in sport, in the anti-discriminatory legislation and activism, for example kicking racism off the terraces and out of the ground eg, FARE(Football Against Racism in Europe) and Kick It Out. But gender bias is resolutely entrenched in the culture of a sport that has nonetheless seen massive increases in the number of women participating, as players, as amateurs if not professionals it has to be said, and as referees (as evidenced by the Football Association’s website.
The FA has attempted to distance itself from the remarks made by Gray and Keys and has emphasised the progress made by women and girls in football (interestingly, men in football are not usually allied to boys on the FA website; maybe football sorts out the men from the boys?). Sky Sports, which has a particularly good reputation for broadcasting women’s sport, also stressed the unacceptability of these comments.
Media coverage and tweets about the incident have embraced discourses of political correctness, rights and inequality as well as reiterating the everyday practices of sexism in sport. The men were not forced to resign, as Ron Atkinson did for his off air racist comments about the Chelsea player Marcel Desailly in 2004.
So the event is still underpinned by the routine acceptance of discrimination against women. It is not superficial; it matters and the FA is fighting a losing battle in its attempts to promote the women’s game and gender equality, if these everyday cultural practices are not addressed.
Study at the OU
From the LearningSpace













Login or Register to post comments
?
So the FA condemn the sexism, Sky condemn the sexism, the newspapers condemn the sexism, evrey tweet, twitter, blog and saloon bar bore condemns the sexism and yet these 'everyday cultural practises' are a problem?
The only issue here is why anyone can get worked up about the opinions of couple of bullies. One a dinosaur and the other a presenter whose role as male totty has somehow given him a gigantic idea of his own importance.
The issue here is of bullying and power and hypocrisy.
Bullying by a pair of egomaniacs whose ratings have allowed them to behave as they wished for 20 years (their treatment over the years instead of young male 'runners' and other members of the production team is far worse than the remarks about the linesman).
The hypocrisy of Keys who whilst making a hundred insincere apologies and donning the hairiest of hair shirts on an hour-long radio interview cannot resist attempting to lay the blame on Karren Brady (whom he had also insulted) for not picking up her phone immediately to accept his personal and presumably equally insincere apology.
The hypocrisy of News Corporation who sack a couple of presenters they want to get rid of for sexism whilst producing Page 3 of the Sun and employing a bimbo quotient of about 80% amongst the autocue readers that are the Sky Sports News team. Is it impossible for a plain or old woman, or heaven help us, a straight man to read the words on an autocue?
Meanwhile instead of employing correct disiplinary action (written warnings and the like) they sack these two bores by means of the 'leak'. Fairly indicative of attitudes within an organisation also up to its neck in the NOTW phone-tapping allegations.
Lots to be more angry with here than sexism.