Debate: Equals

I totally and completely disagree that men and women are equals. Men have a purpose women have a purpose. To say that one should do the others task is just wrong.

That is how law makers rule. Through chaos. They give everyone the wrong task, the wrong title. They create the problem and then have a job for life fixing the problem they made.

To give you an idea of how well evil knows, just how poorly women face evil. In America before women had the right to vote. Men had little other choice but to start another revolution. Because the men realized that George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Benedict Arnold all knew to well that the mass of the populace is not at all right, or good, if left to their own whimsical decisions.
That is why we are a republic. The leaders do what is scientifically right for the people, despite their whims or fancies.
It takes bold tough putting down, of peer pressure to get anything good done. Often the first good thing done will come after the graves are filled in upon a few bad law makers. And only then.

We are moving backwards right now in science. Modern, science flip flops more then a griddle cake.

My point was that the law makers during the start of the second revolution. Appealed to the women and offered the women a vote. Against the honest men's better judgment. The politicians are a sneaky lot. And will use women like a throw away tissue. I admit more and more men are acting like women. And this is very bad. You can head me now or head me later on this issue. I have no doubts.

I watched both men and women in my family go against sane sound judgment where we had information twenty years or more ahead of the its time. And slowly they had to come around as they saw the chaos created by their weak decisions to just wait, or to just let it be. Or my favorite, "let the law makers deal with it".

Now if you discuss this with women, you may get some women to agree, however you will find they will tend to either burnout before they achieve the goal, or bow out before they achieve the goal. Part of the reason is the jealousy that many men will feel if a women stands bravely in the face of hideously evil law makers.

The bulk of women I have put this past, tend to just say no to death, as a way to bring order. They will allow more laws, which are the basic problem in the nutshell. Yet they will often agree to war. Or even genocide. Fascinating really. I admit that some men will also do this. However by actual comparison I believe far more women then men will agree to the darnedest thing rather then to face down law makers.
The voting laws were made to thwart off another revolution. The laws were the great hope, of a peaceful solution.

Women will often say imprison thieves trying to live, under insane taxation. Rather then to say kill law makers. I am not God, or their judge, however I have seen that imprisonment is worse then death.

One thing I do not like at all about women is that their inherent nature is to flip flop on issues. Or to be hypocritical as if, it is their God given right. And look, if they stay at home and flip flop, fine, but if they step foot out of the house and promote law makers they are fair game.

Do not kid yourself, God has done everything possible to law makers, and their backers. And will continue to right them. They are suffering, they are fools of the devil. And God just ruins them for fun. If one ever recovers they could tell a tale of the total waste of their lives. The total destruction of their souls. And what a bunch of sheep they were punishing as law makers. A law maker basically feels the country is full of total fools, just asking to be mistreated. Just like the common con man, trying to put food on the table, starts to see people. To make his actions less evil, more understandable.

America's own new congress had not been flushed clean of law makers. Some of these law makers literally stole positions, and acted like the representatives of states. All because not many peasants were up to speaking publicly, or standing up for themselves in a public debate.

So no, no way should women be allowed near a podium, unless it is to humbly ask that men take back their country for them.

If any of you have seen Hillary Clinton, you should know why women should stay out of the spotlight.

You have to understand we are in total chaos. So perhaps in this climate a women does not seem so strange or bizarre or ill equipped to speak in public. However they are despite the times.
They may bring about a chaos so terrible that it calls for action, sooner rather then later. I believe that is what the Obama party will bring about.

But in a sane country moving upwards, women should stay at home.

One note of caution, women may not be aware of, but very good and very evil people know and see this plainly. It is that when women go for words of hope, or hopeful solutions, from law makers. They are tipping their hand that they do not want action. And will do anything hopeful rather then something useful, and perhaps unpopular.

Anything good will require the individuals of a country to be ready for revolution. And even welcome it to slavery and the dark ages. If they could do this, revolution could be achieved with words.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

...One day a male lion is going to find itself in a very different place because the whole male dominance thing is totally not the way forward and the sooner Simba comes to terms with that the quicker the pride can become disfunctional

This is my favourite post