Skip to content

Battle of the River Plate

A deadly duel at sea and one of the best intelligence bluffs of the Second World War

18 Jan
2006

Used with permission Battleship gun On December 13th 1939, the first great naval battle of World War Two exploded into action off the coast of South America. Against overwhelming firepower, three British ships took on the pride of the German fleet, the pocket battleship Graf Spee.

It would become known as the battle of the River Plate and pit two great naval officers against each other in a deadly duel. The Graf Spee was commanded by Captain Hans Langsdorff, a decorated hero from the First World War. Facing him was Commodore Henry Harwood, a brilliant naval tactician.

A deadly game of ‘cat and mouse’ at sea, culminated in a bloody naval fight. As the world watched, the battle moved ashore in a gripping story of deception, and one of the biggest bluffs of the Second World War.

By the end of this story, one of the two captains would be declared a hero, the other branded a coward and lose his ship, his reputation and eventually his life.

The Battle of the River Plate tells the full story of this epic battle through the families and crews of the two commanders. Exclusive access to the personal archives of the two captains and interviews with their children bring a new understanding of the men behind the uniforms. Interviewed for the first time on television, Captain Langsdorff’s daughter gives a unique insight into Langsdorff the man and reads from his poignant final letter home ("my father writes: ‘Be proud in your grief and prove yourself to be a true soldier’s wife’. It still moves me'...") Even her children have never seen this letter which she has kept hidden away for 66 years.

Commodore Harwood’s two sons bring a personal understanding of their father’s motivation and character (“He had a happy knack of getting results by being nice. People trusted him”). There are hitherto unseen home movies and footage shot by the Commodore himself whilst on patrol in the South Atlantic, and his letters home written during the battle.

Survivors from both sides give powerful personal accounts describing the terror of the battle and its bloody aftermath (“there was a body here and an arm over there, and you knew that that arm belonged to that body because he had the right buttons on his sleeve…”)

Dr Eric Grove - eminent naval historian and author of a recent definitive history of the battle, re-examines how the cat and mouse battle at sea turned into an intriguing ‘cloak and dagger’ battle of wits ashore, culminating in the first great media event of the war. (‘In this battle we have good versus evil, weak versus strong. But the strong is represented by a good man fighting for an evil cause. It’s a tragedy that most playwrights could make a great deal from…’)

This programme re-examines the evidence and tells the full story of the Battle of the River Plate.

Rate and share this page:

There are no ratings yet

Share this page:

.

More like this

Comments

Login or Register to post comments

Post Your Comment

Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

Dr Eric Grove is happy to answer any questions about the programme.I am looking forward to receiving any you my have.

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

I very much enjoyed the River Plate documentary but feel I have to take issue with you over your assertion that having sighted the British squadron Langsdorff 'could have got away...his diesel engines allowed him to accelerate away in the opposite direction...'

The maximum speed of the pocket battleships was 25/26 knots while all three British cruisers were capable of 31/32 knots, so once they were in visual contact surely he was going to have to fight it out whether he stayed or made a run for it.

I am also not convinced by the comment that causing confusion was in some way as good as sinking merchant ships although I can see that might have been the perception in 1939.

Mike Pearson.

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

The diesels were more responsive and Graf Spee's spotting top was taller; Graf Spee could have got away before the British saw her. But you are right that the British cruisers should have been able to shadow, given their speed advantage. As it was they harried Graf Spee to her doom.

Disruption was important in that the intention was to delay sailings and generally slow down British shipping. It was pressure rather than decisive action - but then in December 1939 WWII was still a limited war.

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

Any idea (guess?!) what might have happened if the initial battle hadn't broken off?

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

Graf Spee might perhaps have been able to drive off or sink Ajax and Achilles if she had continued in action. Ajax was quite badly damaged in any case with only half her armment in action. It is possible that a surviving light cruiser might have been able to shadow Graf Spee and bring in more and heavier Allied units. The German ship was getting low on ammunition. Langsdorff's main problem, however was that he had suffered such significant damage to his bow and his cooking and fuel purification equipment that he HAD to put into port before even beginning to try to get home.

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

Eric, does the rule/law about how long you can stay in a neutral harbour still apply? Best wishes, John

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

I suspect it does but as,since the UN Charter, states do not officilly declare war on other states any more, the rule may now be effectively obsolete.

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

Hello, I was curious about the breaking of the british ships into 2 groups. Given that there were 3 ships, would they not have been better to separate completely, so the Germans would have had three distinct targets to juggle between? And why was breaking into 2 groups such a big deal anyway - did they only have one gun & therefore could only shoot at one target at a time?

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

The idea was to get two groups of similar fighting power. Ajax and Achilles were not much individually but as a pair they could deluge Graf Spee with coordinated sixteen gun combined 6-in broadsides that were demoralising as well as damaging. Exeter had bigger guns, 8-in and was significant on her own. The Germans had to fire all six of their main guns at one target to ensure hits given the uncertainties of contemporary gunnery. At any one time one of the two British groups was not under fire from Graf Spee's main guns.The Germans could not concentrate on one threat; this was probably the main reason Exeter was not sunk.

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

Hello Eric!
I was curious about the huge difference between the British and German armaments - did I hear it correctly, the German shells were 10 times larger?! Were the Germans that far ahead, were the British ships outclassed, or were us Brits just that far behind the Germans in gerenal at the start of the war?

Re: Timewatch River Plate

Archive Comments

Graf Spee did have big guns for a ship of her size and speed. Her designers, limited by the Treaty of Versailles, skimped on armour and produced not really a battleship but a cruiser with extra heavy guns. Britain had REAL battleships and battlecruisers with bigger guns still, 15-in and 16-in. It was by convincing Langsdorff that one or more of these assets was waiting outside that he was persuaded to scuttle.

Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Hi,

Just watched the programme and found it very interesting.

What do you think the impact of the battle was? I'm especially curious about the role of the mass media - in the programme it sounded like this was a significant factor. Did it boost British morale, or perhaps something more? Was this an interesting footnote from WWII or something substantially significant?

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Could anyone please tell me if this particular episode of Timewatch will be repeated on BBC or whether I could get hold of a copy on DVD.

My grandfather was serving on the HMS Ajax during this Battle and my father watched this documentary and later told me that he had seen his father in some of the footage towards the end.

My father only saw his dad for 2 years after he left the Navy as he died of cancer when my Dad was 8 years old. This is the only time he has ever seen a moving picture of his father since that time.

If anyone can help me, I would be extremely grateful. Maybe someone recorded this episode onto DVD and perhaps I could make a small donation in exchange for the DVD.

Many many thanks in advance

Louise Sewell (nee Order)

[Edited by: admin on 13-May-2006 11:20]
I'm afraid that copies of the programme are not available and at present there are no plans to repeat this programme.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Had to compliment all concerned on the Graf Spee documentary. I'm sick to the back teeth of producers digging out any old footage to fill in space - classic example recently on History Channel where a programme on the U Boat offensive in the Gulf of Mexico included film of the burning Graf Spee. At least they got the war right.

The Timewatch programme was excellent and I could only complain in a very minor way when the two forward turrets of Scharnhorst or Gneisenau featured fleetingly. The computer generated effects were very good too.

I was fortunate enough back in the late 70s early 80s to enter into lengthy correspondence with Federico Rasenack who was a senior gunnery officer on Graf Spee who got out of Argentina and made his way back to Germany.

And in 1984 I was helped by the Norwegian naval attache in London in organising a visit to the WW2 German gun emplacement near Trondheim - no less than a complete main turret and three 11" guns from the Graf Spee's bigger sister, Gneisenau.

Shame that no mention was made on the Timewatch programme of the attempt started in early 2004 to raise the Graf Spee. I'm not sure how much progress has been made in what was deemed to be a 5 year project, but Graf Spee's main range finder that sat on top of her control tower was raised with many other artifacts that can now be seen in Montevideo.

But my criticisms are very, very minor - a very well put together programme and I look forward to more in the series. Nice one.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Thank you for your most kind words. We decided we were just going to tell the story; 50 minutes is not a long time! The raising of the wreck, or bits of it, is another story with a different production company -and I may well get involved.I hope to see the 11-in turrets one of these days. There is indeed more to be said!

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

And, of course, the Gneisenau turret near Trondheim which was completely re-assembled on land including the 5 levels below the turret, is to all intents and purposes the same as the main armament on Graf Spee. Graf Spee's forward turret should be intact - I'm sure that it should have also been blown up but the charges failed to go off.

I take from what you say that a tv programme might be in the offing re what has transpired so far as the Graf Spee salvage project is concerned? I lent Mensun Bound my correspondence with Federico Rasenack from 78-82, apparently he was still alive in the late 90s - and was himself in his 90s.

You make a very valid point earlier about Exeter - her 8" inch guns were capable of inflicting serious damage on Graf Spee as the death toll of nearly 40 men testified.

Rasenack commented about the possibilities of getting out of the Plate Estuary and regardless of what was waiting for Graf Spee, he raised the point about the limited scope for maneouvres Graf Spee would've had in a narrow and not very deep channel out to sea.

50 minutes to fit it all in - how much footage wasn't used! Mustn't complain - there was still footage in this documentary that I hadn't seen. Well done, again.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

I saw the thread when seeking for some news about Frederick Rasenack. I had some mail contact with him during last year . He was still alive, living in La Falda Cordoba Argentina and although withy some health problems he was doing well. He is now entering his nineties. I sent him an oil painting of his very dear ship and in return he gave me a copy of his book signed and dedicated to me. I spoke with his son some months ago and he told me his father was doing well but I had no replies on the occasions I wrote recently.
Faithfully
Alejandro

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

On 4th March 1940 the wreck of the 'Graf Spee' was bought by the British government for £14,000. The purchase was made by uruguyan businessman Senor Julio Vega Helguera for the British. On 11th May 1940 some 50 tons of material from the wreck was taken by uruguayan contractor Regusci & Voulminot and delivered to ss 'Princesa' in Montevideo for shipping back to the UK. I would be interested to know if the British government still own the wreck. The 'Princesa' did arrive with the cargo intact at Milford Haven on 15th June having joined up with convoy SL34 on 1st June.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Again, thank you for your positive response. We shall see what happens over the Graf Spee wreck and whether we have a TV programme or not. It would be nice to see as much as possible of the ship again, but I gather that the wreck is in a very poor state on the starboard side. Yes, the explosives in the fore part of the ship did not go off (NB the middle gun of the fore turret drooping after it had been isolated from the other two when the screw fell out at the outset of the action). THe Uraguayans want a TV company to get rid of a hazard to navigation. Let's see what happens!

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

The battle took place during the period of the "Phoney War" when not much else was happening. It seemed to be the first real engagement between the British and the Germans and the winners naturally made much of it. It also happened in the Americas which kindled a lot of Transatlantic interest. There was even live commentary on the scuttling on American radio with a reporter in Montevideo. This was I think also carried on the BBC. The whole affair was both public and dramatic, and the British had little else to cheer about for some time!

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Thanks Eric. Did it make any significant impact though? What was the impact in Germany? Did it help reduce the merchant shipping losses, or were there plenty more German ships to take her place?

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

I think Dr Goebbels put the best spin on the loss of Graf Spee but the German fleet was small (only six major units in 1939)and the loss of one of them was highly significant. By the Summer of 1940 after the further losses of the Norwegian campaign only one big ship,Admiral Hipper an 8-in gun heavy cruiser (same gun size as HMS Exeter), was available. Dealing with the Graf Spee also completely secured shipping in the South Atlantic for some considerable time, allowing significantly freer movement of supplies.It also released the not inconsiderable forces allocated to the raider hunting groups for other duties.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

What interested me was the depiction of the Germans - an honest enemy? Was this a product of the time of the war, i.e. very early on before the eastern front, the gas chambers, etc. Or the nature of the sea battle? Or the behaviour of the sea captain? Or a combination of all of this and more? Presumably you could only be a German sea captain having sworn an oath to Hitler? I thought it an excellent programme - very well made and presented. What did other people think? I would be interested, Eric, to hear about how it was made. Best wishes, John

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

What happened to the British newly promoted admiral, who won the battle, did he survive the war? Did he do anything else during the war of note? It was interesting to hear the views of his children (and of his German opponent too). Best wishes, John

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

After leaving the South American station Harwood went to the Admiralty. Then he was made C-inC Mediterranean to succeed Admiral Cunningham in 1942. ABC was a tough act to follow and the strategic situation was dire.Harwood even had to turn back a Malta convoy. Montgomery was also a difficult colleague and in the end poor Harwood's health broke down under the strain. In my view Harwood was too nice a man to be really fitted for the very highest command, but as a cruiser commodore he was without peer.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

A this stage in the war the conflict at sea was a war between professionals. Surface raiders could act in a humane way, and did; and their humanity was reciprocated in the attitude of Langsdorff's victims. Germans were not so vilified as they later became. Britain had not been bombed. There were fewer political prisoners in Germany in 1939 than in the USSR. Hitler was anti-semitic but so were our Polish allies who had been the occasion of the war. I think the attitudes of 1939 have conditioned our attitude to the whole battle. At the time British propaganda made Langsdorff out to be an anti-nazi even creating the myth that he shot himself on an old Imperial ensign. Much was made of his 'Naval' as oposed to Nazi salute at the funeral of his men in Montevideo. In fact, that was quite normal, Nazi salutes only came in for the armed forces late in the war. The British prisoners in Graf Spee reported Langsdorff to be loyal to the Fuhrer but his faith had been shaken by the deal with Stalin. It is hard not to portray him as an an attractive figure.

As for the programme all I did was attend a recording session at a lovely house in West London and answer questions. The production team headed By the producer James Hayes had already been in touch because I am the author of the latest book on the subject, 'The Price of Disobedience' We had discussed the people James ought to contact, several of which on the British side I knew. In the recording session we went through the story for the camera and James later picked the bits he wanted to use.Then,when the script had been completed I checked it. The whole quality of the programme comes from James and the professionalism of him and his team. He is a real pleasure to work with!

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

I have major problems with some of your statemants sir...."Hitler was anti-semitic but so were our Polish allies" - are you seriously try to compare Polish anti-semitism to the nazi one??? While, undoubtedly, many Poles were anti-semitic, anti-semitism wasn't Polish national policy. There was no Polish "Kristallnacht" and no Jew was forced to wear a yellow Star of David. As for "Polish allies who had been the occasion of the war" - let me remind you that the cause of war was German unprovoked attack on Poland which, in turn, was a direct result of appleasment polict towards Hitler by British and French governments.

Darius Przezdziecki

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Sorry if I offended you but remember Poland was on Germany's side at the time Of Munich. She got Teschen out of it! If Britain and France had gone to war over Czechslovakia in 1938 Poland would have been on Germany's side to resist the Soviet forces coming from the east, as they did in 1939. Also the Polish regime was indeed anti semitic, if not so rigorously as in Germany. The dispute over the Polish Corridor might have been settled if the British, who were understandably disgusted by the occupation of Bohemia- Moravia contrary to the Munich agreement, had not guaranteed Poland unconditionally. This misled the poor Polish government that they might be defended a little more directly than just declaring war. The point I was trying to make was that the world looked differently in 1939. Reading history backwards is rather dangerous and misleading.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Please don't misunderstand me.... I am not trying to defend policies of Polish government in years lesding to WW2. In fact I would be first to condemn many of those policies as shortsighted if not right down stupid. Still, let me repeat it once again, there can be no comparison of the fate of Jews in Poland and in Germany at the time in question. I also don't need to read history backwards to know that the statement: "The dispute over the Polish Corridor might have been settled if the British, who were understandably disgusted by the occupation of Bohemia- Moravia contrary to the Munich agreement, had not guaranteed Poland unconditionally." is erroneous. After being generously granted Sudetenland, it took Hitler exactly 6 months to occupy the rest of Czechoslovakia. How long it would have taken him to make further territorial demands if Poles "settled" (by "settled" you mean "given up" I suppose?)the Polish Corridor dispute???

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Perhaps; but Poland only fell out with Hitler in 1939. I do wonder if there was a settlement of the Corridor question that would have negotiated Hitler out of the war he wanted (as Neville Chamberlain did in 1938). Poor Poland's problem was that it was sandwiched between the two worst tyrannies of the 20th Century.I am really sympathetic to the country's problems - not least Katyn. The basic point from the angle of the programme is that in 1939 Langsdorff seemed to be the model of the civilised German - to be contrasted with the Nazi regime. I think, from the evidence, that Langsdorff stayed more loyal than British propaganda would have had you believe- despite the partition of Poland that really troubed him, because of the deal with Stalin. Langsdorff was not an evil man and it is interestng that despite my best efforts (I am an unreconstucted Harwood man)Langsdorff's qualities seem always to shine through. The basic point I think is this:-it was Langsdorff's personal decision to engage Harwood and it went terribly wrong; but he was not willing to kill his young men for his mistake.This to the allies meant he could NOT have been 'a Nazi". The truth, as usual, is more complicated...

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

"Perhaps; but Poland only fell out with Hitler in 1939." So did France and Britain. They all considered Hitler as a lesser evil than Stalin.

As for negotiating Hitler out of the war he wanted - possible but very likely, since taking of Poland was (IMO) just a step in realisation of his "Drang Nach Osten" and "Lebensraum" ideas.

I do agree with you about Langsdorff though. Notice that Rommel was thought of as a "civilised German" in exactly the same way. And, like Langsdorff, Rommel was much more of Hitler's lojalist than it is generally assumed.

Re: Timewatch: The Impact of The Battle of River Plate

Archive Comments

Errata - the sentence: "As for negotiating Hitler out of the war he wanted - possible but very likely, since taking of Poland was (IMO) just a step in realisation of his "Drang Nach Osten" and "Lebensraum" ideas." should read: "As for negotiating Hitler out of the war he wanted - possible but NOT very likely, since taking of Poland was (IMO) just a step in realisation of his "Drang Nach Osten" and "Lebensraum" ideas"

Apologies DP

Article Information

Publication details

Copyright information
• Body text - Copyrighted: The Open University
• Image 'Battleship gun' - Copyrighted: Used with permission

Article Feeds

If you enjoyed this, why not follow a feed to find out when we have new things like it? Choose an RSS feed from the list below. (Don't know what to do with RSS feeds?)
Remember, you can also make your own, personal feed by combining tags from around OpenLearn.

About OpenLearn

Hide

Explore

Try

Study

OU Courses

OpenLearn Now

Hide
Dickens: Want some more? Copyrighted Image iStock

Delve into the world of Dickens on his bicentenary.

Tag Clouds

Hide

My Cloud

Discover the latest about your passions - Sign In or Register and start a personal tag cloud.

What are Tag Clouds?
http://www.open.edu/openlearn/sites/all/themes/ole/flash/tagcloud.swf

Creative Commons License Except for third party materials and otherwise stated, content on this site is made available
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Licence

/openlearn/sites/all/themes/ole/