Law is an interesting and lively subject that touches upon all aspects of everyday life. We hope that you will enjoy this course, which provides an introduction to the fascinating topic of law.
This course assumes that you have some interest in the law. You may be interested because of some direct involvement with the law, for example in buying a house, or your interest may have been sparked by one of the many television programmes based in a legal setting.
Law is often associated with traditional images and some see it as a dry subject requiring days to be spent in gloomy libraries poring over enormous dusty old books in order to solve obscure and difficult problems. We hope to dispel these viewpoints by showing you how law affects numerous aspects of our everyday lives and does so in interesting and sometimes quirky ways.
You will need a place to store your notes, thoughts and activity responses during the course. A ring binder and file dividers would enable you to rearrange notes or insert extra sheets, or you might prefer to keep a notebook. The choice of how to organise your work is yours to make and you may wish to experiment with different methods.
This OpenLearn course provides a sample of level 1 study in Law
After studying this course, you should be able to:
explain why the law matters
give some examples of legal rights and responsibilities
understand how different reading styles suit different purposes.
In this part of the course we are going to explore the role of law within society, its relationship to us as individuals, and its purpose.
There are many aspects to our law and legal system, and you may have come across reports of court cases, crime statistics, the behaviour of judges or the sentencing of a convicted criminal in the news, books or newspapers, television programmes or films. Law is actually all around us; it is wide-ranging and governs all aspects of our lives. The law underpins simple day-to-day transactions from buying a bus ticket or a cup of coffee, to more complicated matters such as employment, paying taxes, renting a home and how businesses operate. It even provides the guidelines which determine how a government may use its powers to rule.
What is a law? How do we recognise laws and why are they obeyed? It is important that we decide what we mean by the term ‘law’ before we go any further.
It is not easy to give a definition of law, as legal systems differ and individuals have different views of what law is. Many books containing numerous different ideas about and definitions of law have been written. A common theme emerging from these books and debates, however, has been that the law is a set of rules created by the state that form a framework to ensure a peaceful society. The law is enforced by the state. If it is broken or breached, sanctions can be imposed. While this definition does not cover all types of law, it is a good starting point as it brings together the idea of a state issuing commands to individuals and applying sanctions to those individuals if they do not obey these commands.
Generally, law applies to people throughout a country. There are, of course, laws which apply only to certain groupings, for example those that apply to children and young people or that apply only to individuals who drive.
For the purposes of this course, law will be defined as:
a set of rules created by the state which forms a framework to ensure a peaceful society. If the rules are broken they can be enforced by mechanisms created by the state and sanctions imposed.
This definition covers the key features of the law as we know it. It is created by the state to ensure that society works smoothly. If laws are broken then the people who broke them will face some form of punishment. The state also provides for methods of law enforcement. Therefore, during this course when we look at a specific law we will be considering some of the rights and responsibilities it entails, and how these are acquired and used.
The next activity is designed to explore further the definition of the law and how it applies to daily life.
Without looking at the comment below, spend a few minutes thinking about what you have done today. Identify anything you have done that you think may have been governed by ‘laws’. When you have finished, read the comment.
There are many things you may have done today. You may have gone shopping, taken a bus, gone to work, bought lunch in a café, visited the doctor, bought a newspaper, watched the television, surfed the internet, driven a car, walked in the park, spoken to a friend on the telephone, withdrawn money from a cashpoint, paid an electricity bill, taken the children to school, and so forth. These are just some examples.
What they all have in common, though, is that in some way they are all affected by the law. Whether you stayed at home, went out shopping or went to work, there were legal dimensions to these actions. Even in our own homes, where it is generally thought we have the right to do as we please, we are affected by the law. We cannot behave in certain ways that affect our neighbours, such as playing music over a certain volume or letting trees grow high so that they become a nuisance. If our conduct breaks the law, such as using electricity without paying for it, or downloading music illegally from the internet, we could be prosecuted even though the activity was done in our home. We have to follow the law even in our own homes.
The law provides a framework that regulates the way we live, work and socialise. We may not agree with all the laws that exist but they have each been created for a purpose, whether it is to protect society, such as laws against violence, or to protect us, such as laws regulating the quality of products we buy.
Think back to some of the examples discussed in Activity 1. How do these link to the definition of law given above? If we do not pay for our shopping, we are breaking a law. Society does not think that this behaviour would be acceptable. A law has therefore been created which makes it a criminal offence to take something from a shop without paying for it.
One of the other examples was buying lunch in a café. Again, if you eat a lunch you have ordered and you do not pay, you would be guilty of a crime. However, in this example the person selling the lunch also has responsibilities. They have to comply with laws relating to food preparation, to advertising and to health and safety. While they have the right to expect you to pay for what you have eaten, they also have a responsibility to you for the food they have sold you.
Here you are going to read an extract about the importance of law. You may need a dictionary to look up some words if you are unsure of their meaning. When you have read the extract, note down three things that you found interesting or surprising about the importance of law.
Law is all-pervasive. It exists in every cell of life. It affects everyone virtually all of the time. It governs everything in life and even what happens to us after life. It applies to everything from the embryo to exhumation. It governs the air we breathe, the food and drink that we consume, our travel, sexuality, family relationships and our property. It applies at the bottom of the ocean and in space. It regulates the world of sport, science, employment, business, political liberty, education, health services – everything, in fact, from neighbour disputes to war.
The law in the United Kingdom has evolved over a long period. It has, over the centuries, successfully adapted itself through a great variety of social settings and disputes of government. Today it contains elements that are ancient, such as the coroners’ courts, which have an 800-year history and elements that are very modern, such as electronic law reports and judges using laptop computers.
Law has also become much more widely recognised as the standard by which behaviour needs to be judged. A very telling change in recent history is the way in which the law has permeated all parts of social life. The universal standard of whether something is socially acceptable is progressively becoming whether it is legal. In earlier times, most people were illiterate and did not have the vote. They were ruled, in effect by what we would call tyranny. And this was not just in 1250. That state of affairs still existed in the UK in 1850. Today, by contrast, most people are literate and have the vote. Parliamentary democracy is our system of government. So, it is quite possible and desirable for people in general to take an interest in law.
There are a number of points you could have noted. One student listed the following:
Throughout this course we will be considering rights and responsibilities that are provided by, protected by and imposed by the law. These range from rights and responsibilities that are fundamental to all of our lives to rights and responsibilities that apply to particular aspects of our lives when we are undertaking a specific role, for example as a worker or a parent. Practical examples will be used to help explain this. The examples will also show, importantly, that in many instances where the law provides us with rights on the one hand, it also imposes responsibilities on the other. For example, an employer has a responsibility to pay an employee for work done and an employee has the right to claim unpaid wages. An employee also has a responsibility to obey reasonable, lawful orders while an employer may be able to dismiss an employee for failure to obey such orders.
The law describes a person able to exercise their rights and responsibilities as having legal capacity. Having legal capacity means that a person has the mental capacity to understand and appreciate the consequences of their actions. Although all individuals have basic rights from the time they are born, the law determines that children and young people acquire more rights and responsibilities as they mature and their mental capacity develops.
Equally, when mental capacity is lost through illness or accident in later life, the law recognises that legal capacity is also affected, and allows others to make decisions for individuals who cannot understand the consequences of their actions.
Law is involved in a balancing act between the rights of different individuals and therefore imposes responsibilities to balance those rights. The following tables illustrate this question of balance.
If you are employed then you have a contractual relationship with your employer. In law, your employer has a responsibility for your health and safety; in return you have a responsibility not to risk the health and safety of others in your workplace.
Workers have the right: | Workers have the responsibility: |
|
|
Whenever you buy anything as a consumer you are entering into a contract which is a legally binding agreement. In doing so, you have certain rights and responsibilities, set out in Table 2. If you use public rights of way in the countryside, you have the rights and responsibilities set out in Table 3.
Rights | Responsibilities |
The goods you buy must be:
If not, then:
|
|
Rights | Responsibilities |
|
|
From these tables you can see that there is a balance between rights and responsibilities. When exercising their rights, individuals also need to recognise the rights of others. A balance is needed and with rights come responsibilities. The following example might help to explain this. Children have a right to education. Local authorities have a legal responsibility to provide education for all children of compulsory school age in their area (5- to 16-year-olds) which is appropriate to their age, abilities and any special educational needs that they might have.
Schoolchildren have a responsibility not to disrupt lessons so that other pupils are prevented from receiving their right to education.
Where there appears to be a conflict between the rights of two (or more) people or organisations this may result in a dispute that is settled in court. One such dispute occurred in the village of Lintz in County Durham and culminated in the famous legal case of Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966.
Before we go on to look at this case, it is a good idea to have a quick look at the format of case names and the way in which legal cases are presented (see Figure 1). In a civil case, a judge (or judges) will hear the information presented by both sides of the dispute. The person bringing the dispute is known as the claimant (in older cases the term plaintiff was used); the person defending it is known as the defendant. Once the judge or judges have listened to all the facts and the evidence, they will make a decision. This decision is known as their judgment and is made by applying the law to the facts of the case (please note, the usual spelling is ‘judgement’, however, when referring to a decision of the court it is spelled ‘judgment’, without the middle ‘e’).
In the centre, in bold print, are the words ‘Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966’. Each separate word has an arrow pointing to it with some explanatory text.
The arrow pointing to the word ‘Miller’ states: ‘The first name is the claimant (formerly known as the plaintiff). This is the person or organisation who brought the case’.
The arrow pointing to the letter ‘v’ states: ‘This is versus or against’.
The arrow pointing to the word ‘Jackson’ states: ‘The second name is the defendant’.
The arrow pointing to the year ‘[1977]’ states: ‘This is the year in which the case came to court or the year in which it was reported’.
The arrow pointing to ‘QB’ states: ‘This stands for Queen’s Bench – the division of the High Court where the case was heard and the title of the law report where the case was reported’.
The arrow pointing to ‘966’ states: ‘This is the page number of the law report’.
The case we are going to look at concerned a dispute between Mr and Mrs Miller and a local cricket club about the number of cricket balls that were hit out of the cricket ground, landing on the Millers’ property, damaging their house and risking personal injury to Mr and Mrs Miller. Mr and Mrs Miller were the plaintiffs and Mr Jackson, the chairman of the cricket club, on behalf of its members, was the defendant. Cricket had been played at the cricket ground in Lintz since the early 1900s. In the 1970s, a field next to the cricket ground was sold to a developer who built a number of houses there. Mr and Mrs Miller bought one of the houses. Their house and garden were only 30 metres from where cricket was played. Inevitably, given the proximity of their house and garden to the cricket ground, balls regularly landed on their property. Mr and Mrs Miller approached the cricket club about this and in 1975 the club erected a high fence and told its batsmen to avoid hitting balls over the boundary or fence. Although these measures helped, cricket balls still landed on the Millers’ property and the Millers decided to go to court to sue for damages and to obtain an injunction to prevent cricket being played on the ground. The court therefore had to balance the right of the cricket club to continue to use a ground which it had been playing on for many years before the houses were built, with the right of Mr and Mrs Miller to enjoy their house and garden without fear of being hit by cricket balls themselves or of damage to their house and garden. The case was first heard in the High Court in Nottingham, where the judge agreed to grant the injunction and ordered the cricket club to pay damages. However, the cricket club appealed this decision and Mr and Mrs Miller cross-appealed for more damages. The appeal was heard in the Court of Appeal in 1977 in front of three Court of Appeal judges. One of the judges, Lord Justice Cumming-Bruce, set out what the court had to do. It had to:
seek to strike a fair balance between the rights of the plaintiffs to have quiet enjoyment of their house and garden without exposure to cricket balls occasionally falling like thunderbolts from the heavens and the opportunity of the inhabitants of the village in which they live to continue to enjoy the manly sport which constitutes a summer recreation for adults and young persons.
The Court of Appeal decided that the cricket club should be allowed to continue to play at the ground and so the injunction was not appropriate. However, the sum of damages to be paid by the club to Mr and Mrs Miller was increased to account for past and future damage.
In practice, it is not always easy to achieve the balance between rights and responsibilities, or to achieve a balance that satisfies the rights of different people when, as in Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966 there is a conflict of rights.
Law is a subject that requires a lot of reading. This reading can become much more manageable and enjoyable by using reading skills that help you to read more efficiently. Reading for legal study and further study in general becomes more efficient if it is done with a purpose.
Think about three items that you have read in the last day or so. What was the purpose of reading them? Did you read them differently?
Below, a colleague describes the different ways she read three items.
You will probably find that you are already reading with a purpose without really thinking about it.
As a law student you will find it useful to understand and develop the following reading purposes or styles:
In reading for gist, you are reading to understand what a text is about in general and to discover the central idea or theme of the text. Here you will quickly skim read the text to find out what it is about. You may not read or understand every word.
To practise reading for gist, skim read the following two pieces of text to see how quickly you can understand what each text is about.
The British are over four times more likely to first turn to their family, friends, acquaintances or nobody to discuss financial or debt worries than they are to seek professional advice, a survey reveals.
The study from Community Legal Service Direct shows that the British stiff upper lip is alive and well, with only 18% with cash worries saying they would first turn to professionals for advice.
The main reasons revealed in the research for not turning to professionals for advice on financial or debt matters was that it costs too much (42%), that they are strangers (41%), while 40% of respondents felt they couldn’t be trusted.
Most people (69%) would rather deal with a financial problem themselves than turn to others. When they do, over half of those with financial worries (54%) ask family, friends or acquaintances for advice first. One in five (18%) have turned to their hairdresser, pub landlord, taxi driver or religious leader to discuss their money problems.
Of those polled, only 47% of those who sought financial advice – including from acquaintances – felt that they were given some good tips. Almost one in five (19%) said their source of advice on financial or debt worries was unhelpful.
With Britain’s personal debt increasing by £1m every four minutes and 330 people being made insolvent in the UK every day, John Sirodcar, head of Community Legal Service Direct, says it’s worrying that people, especially the most vulnerable, are not getting the financial and legal advice they need.
‘While it’s natural for people to look to those they know to give them advice, well intentioned as it may be, this is clearly not always going to be the best advice,’ he says.
Plans to crack down on cowboy builders by boosting powers for local authorities to tackle illegal or botched construction have been announced by the government.
Under the Building Act 1984, s35, authorities only have six months from completion of non-compliant work to bring a prosecution for breaches of building regulations – proposals in the consultation paper would increase this to two years. Within this period, a prosecution can be brought within six months of discovery of sufficient evidence to prosecute.
Authorities say the extra time is needed to make enforcement more effective, given that defects may not become immediately apparent.
Iain Wright, communities and local government minister, says: ‘It is not right that those committing serious breaches and avoiding justified enforcement action are putting themselves and others at health and safety risk.’
The consultation paper stresses that prosecution is aimed at flagrant, wilful or repeated non-compliance, not one-off minor failures. No additional burdens or risk of prosecution will be imposed on those who comply with building regulation requirements, the government says.
The consultation, Longer Time Limits for Prosecution of Breaches of Building Regulations, can be found at www.communities.gov.uk and runs until 23 October 2007.
Although both of these texts might have included terms or phrases that you did not understand, we hope that you have understood what they are both about. Even though both contain detailed information, with the first, in particular, containing figures and percentages, when reading for gist you would not be concerned with this detail. You just need to uncover the main ideas. We summarised these as:
In a way, reading for specific information is also a form of skim reading, in that you will be scanning a text to find this specific information. This is how my colleague read her letter from the Inland Revenue as she was looking particularly for the date by which she had to respond. However, once you have found the information, you need to read the text very carefully. Legal materials have a precise meaning and missing or misreading even one or two words can make a significant difference to the meaning.
What is the difference between a law on dangerous dogs that says ‘dogs which bite twice must be destroyed’ and one which says ‘dogs which bite twice may be destroyed’?
The difference between them is one word: must in the first and may in the second. There is no room for debate or mercy in the first law – any dog which bites twice has to be destroyed. In the second law, someone (probably a court) has power to order the destruction of the dog, but can choose not to do so. The difference of one word makes a significant difference to the meaning and operation of the law.
Now you will try an activity where you will read a longer piece for specific information.
For this activity you should read Reading 1, which is an extract from an article called ‘Butts out’, and then answer the questions that follow. To do this you should first read for gist, reading the whole extract through quickly to get a general idea of its content. Then read the questions.
Next, read the article again and highlight the sections of the text that provide the answers. You can then write your answers to the questions. Write each answer as a short sentence rather than a one-word response.
Questions
The article is about the impact of the ban on smoking in all enclosed public places, which came into force in England in July 2007.
Our answers to the questions were:
In this activity, although you were reading to find specific information, you were also interpreting the text. Interpretation is a particularly important legal skill that you would develop over time if you undertook further legal study. In answering Questions 3 and 4 about the sandwich delivery business and the dressmaking workshop, you were interpreting the text to work out an answer.
This type of reading aims to identify the main points of a piece of text to enable you to make your own notes. Being able to do this effectively is very important for all students, but particularly so for law students who have to read a lot of material. In the next activity you will practise reading a text to identify the main points. Again, we recommend that you read the text through quickly, to gain an overall impression of it, then reread it, highlighting the main points. Then write brief notes that you could use again.
Read Reading 2, which is an extract about the impact of prison on the families of prisoners. Highlight the main points and write some brief notes.
You may have chosen different points, but Figures 5 and 6 show the points that we highlighted and the notes that we made.
This figure shows suggestions on the parts of the text which you may have highlighted in Activity 7.
Paragraph 1: words highlighted are:
Paragraph 2: words highlighted are:
Paragraph 4: words highlighted are:
Paragraph 6: words highlighted are:
This figure shows suggestions on the notes you may have made on the extract in Activity 7. It reads as follows:
Heading: the impact of prison on families
Learning to make a précis (pronounced pray-see) or to summarise a piece of text is another important skill for law students and follows on from reading to reformulate. A précis is a summary or a concise statement.
Using the notes that you made in the last activity, prepare a précis of the extract in Reading 2. If possible, try to do this in a few sentences and ideally in no more than 50 words.
There is no one correct answer to this. Our précis would be:
The families of prisoners, and in particular children, experience long-term disadvantage. There is only limited expertise in dealing with the problems of prisoners’ families. The social impact of imprisonment adds substantially to the cost of imprisonment. (37 words)
In this course you have been introduced to the role of law in society and the idea of rights and responsibilities, together with the concepts of mental and legal capacity. You have also considered different styles of reading that are useful when studying.
We hope that you have enjoyed your study of Starting with law. Laws reflect the society that creates them, thereby aiding further social development and growth.
Laws can be contentious, misreported and misinterpreted, but they do enable us to assert our rights and provide a framework for our responsibilities.
We also hope that you have found the learning skills covered in this course to be helpful and that you have taken the opportunity to practise and polish your own skills. These skills and others are essential for successful study and will assist you in gaining the most from the study of any academic subject as well as being transferable to the workplace and everyday life.
Except for third-party materials and unless otherwise stated (see terms and conditions), this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence.
Course image: Michael Jolley in Flickr made available under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Licence.
The material acknowledged below is Proprietary and used under licence (not subject to Creative Commons Licence). Grateful acknowledgement is made to the following sources for permission to reproduce material in this course:
© The Open University
Every effort has been made to contact copyright owners. If any have been inadvertently overlooked, the publishers will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at the first opportunity.
Don't miss out:
If reading this text has inspired you to learn more, you may be interested in joining the millions of people who discover our free learning resources and qualifications by visiting The Open University - www.open.edu/ openlearn/ free-courses
Copyright © 2016 The Open University