Achieving public dialogue
Achieving public dialogue

This free course is available to start right now. Review the full course description and key learning outcomes and create an account and enrol if you want a free statement of participation.

Free course

Achieving public dialogue

References

References and further reading
Bodmer, W. (1985) The Public Understanding of Science, London, Royal Society.
Bown, W. (2005) Time to disengage. Editorial. Research Fortnight, 14 September 2005.
Council for Science and Technology (2005) Policy through dialogue: informing policies based on science and technology. Available from: http://www.cst.gov.uk/ cst/ reports/ files/ policy-through-dialogue/ report.pdf [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] , accessed 13 March 2007.
Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2004) The GMDialogue: Government response. Available from: http://www.defra.gov.uk/ environment/ gm/ crops/ debate/ pdf/ gmdialogue-response.pdf
Durant, J. (1999) ‘Foreword’, in Palmer, J. (ed.) ‘Final Report’, UK National Consensus Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Cambridge, UK CEED.
GM Nation? (2003) The findings of the public debate. Available from: http://www.gmnation.org.uk/, home page of the GM Nation? public debate, accessed 13 March 2007.
Grundahl, J. (1995) ‘The Danish consensus conference’, in Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London, Science Museum, pp.31–40.
Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W. and O'Riordon, T. (2004) A deliberative future; an independent evaluation of the GM Nation? public debate.
House of Lords (2000), Science and Society, London, HMSO.
Jørgensen, T. (1995) ‘Consensus conferences in the health care sector’, in Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London, Science Museum, pp.17–29.
Joss, S. (1995) ‘Evaluating consensus conferences: necessity or luxury?’ in Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London, Science Museum, pp.89–108.
Joss, S. (2002) ‘Toward the public sphere — reflections on the development of participatory technology assessment’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 22, pp.220–231.
Joss, S. and Durant, J. (1995) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London: Science Museum.
Klug, A. (2001) Address of the RS president; Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 2000. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 55, pp.165–177.
Klüver, L. (1995) ‘Consensus conferences at the Danish Board of Technology’, in Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London, Science Museum, pp.41–49.
Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (eds) (2005) Science and citizens; globalisation and the challenge of engagement, London, Zed Books.
Mayer, S. (2003) GM Nation? Engaging people in real debate? Buxton Derbyshire, Gene Watch UK.
Meacher, M. (1999) ‘Responses to the Citizens' panel report’, in Palmer, J. (ed.) ‘Final Report’, UK National Consensus Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Cambridge, UK CEED.
Mohr, A. (2002) ‘A new policy-making instrument? The first Austrian consensus conference’, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Griffiths University.
New Economics Foundation (2005) DEMOCS and Public Policy: a Briefing, London, nef. Available from: http://www.neweconomics.org/ gen/ democs.aspx, accessed 13 March 2007.
Palmer, J. (1999) ‘Introduction and background’, in Palmer, J. (ed.) ‘Final Report’, UK National Consensus Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Cambridge, UK CEED.
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2001) Open Channels: Public Dialogue in Science and Technology. POST Report No.153.
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2002) Open Channels: Public Dialogue on Science and Technology. POST Report No 189.
PUEC Group, University College London (2004) DEMOCS Assessment Report. Available from nef, 3 Jonathan Street, London SE11 5NH.
Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and Pidgeon, N. (2005) Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops, Public Understanding of Science, 14, pp.331–352.
Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004–2014 (2004) HMSO. Available from: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk, accessed 13 March 2007.
Walker, P. and Higginson, S. (2003) So you‘re using a card game to make policy recommendations? The evolution of DEMOCS, October 2001–January 2003, London, New Economics Foundation. Available from: http://www.neweconomics.org/ gen/ democs.aspx, accessed 13 March 2007.
Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B. and Stilgoe, J. (2005) The Public Value of Science; or How to Ensure that Science Really Matters, London, DEMOS. Available at http://www.demos.co.uk/ catalogue/ publicvalueofscience/, accessed 13 March 2007.
S802_1

Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has over 40 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to university level study, find out more about the types of qualifications we offer, including our entry level Access courses and Certificates.

Not ready for University study then browse over 900 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus