from The Open University
Alternatively you can skip the navigation by pressing 'Enter'.

TV, Radio & Events menu item
Coming up
Thinking Allowed: Factory music and volunteering postrecession
Monday, 6th July 2015 00:15  BBC Radio 4<p>On this week's programme, Laurie Taylor and guests discuss pop music in worker's culture and how... Read more: Thinking Allowed: Factory music and volunteering postrecessionThe Met: Policing London: Episode Five
Monday, 6th July 2015 21:00  BBC OneCatching History's Criminals: The Forensics Story: Instruments Of Murder
Monday, 6th July 2015 22:00  BBC FourThe Met: Policing London: Episode Five
Monday, 6th July 2015 22:35  BBC OneCatch up
Catching History's Criminals: The Forensics Story: Instruments Of Murder
Available until Wednesday, 5th August 2015 23:00The key piece of evidence that detectives are desperate to find is the murder weapon. Read more: Catching History's Criminals: The Forensics Story: Instruments Of MurderThinking Allowed: Factory music and volunteering postrecession
Available for over a yearThe Bottom Line: Summer 2015: The Bottom Line  Burger Battles
Available for over a yearThe Met: Policing London: Episode One
Available until Friday, 10th July 2015 02:50 
Get Started menu item
Welcome to OpenLearn
Get the most out of OpenLearn  Sign in
OpenLearn is the home of free learning from the UK's largest university, The Open University. We have over 800 free courses available for you to study right now. More about this site
Inspire me
Life
David Attenborough explores the vibrant mix of life found on our plant  where it comes from, and... Read more: LifeTake the photographic memory test
Can you capture scenes just by looking at them? Find out with our photographic memory test. Launch now: Take the photographic memory testFree courses
Start writing fiction
Have you always wanted to write, but never quite had the courage to start? This free course,... Try: Start writing fiction nowFuel poverty in Scotland
In this unit, you will be hearing and reading about the issues faced by people living in poverty... Try: Fuel poverty in Scotland nowBecome an OU student
Learning to learn
Try our free course and get the most out of all our free courses Try: Learning to learn now
 You are here:
 Home
 Science, Maths & Technology
 Mathematics and Statistics
 Mathematics
 Babylonian mathematics
 1.6 The social context of Babylonian ...
Babylonian mathematics
This unit looks at Babylonian mathematics. You will learn how a series of discoveries...
This unit looks at Babylonian mathematics. You will learn how a series of discoveries have enabled historians to decipher stone tablets and study the various techniques the Babylonians used for problemsolving and teaching. The Babylonian problemsolving skills have been described as remarkable and scribes of the time received a trainng far in advance of anything available in medieval Christian Europe 3000 years later.
After studying this unit you should be able to:
 know something about cuneiform how it was used to represent numbers for mathematical problem solving and computation;
 understand the relationship between a decimal placevalue system and a sexagesimal one;
 appreciate the advanced understanding of mathematics in Ancient Mesopotamia in relation to anyone in medieval Christian Europe 3000 years later.
 Duration 8 hours
 Updated Friday 8th July 2011
 Intermediate level
 Posted under Mathematics
Contents
 Introduction
 Learning outcomes
 1 Babylonian mathematics
 1.2 A Babylonian mathematical problem
 1.3 The historical study of cuneiform
 1.4 A remarkable numeration system
 1.5 Plimpton 332
 Current section: 1.6 The social context of Babylonian mathematical activity
 1.7 Babylonian mathematical style
 1.8 Conclusion
 1.9 Further reading
 Acknowledgements
Study this free course
Enrol to access the full course, get recognition for the skills you learn, track your progress and on completion gain a statement of participation to demonstrate your learning to others. Make your learning visible!
1.6 The social context of Babylonian mathematical activity
The extant mathematical tablets from the Old Babylonian period fall broadly into two categories, table texts and problem texts. You have seen examples of both of these. The weighingthestone problem with which we started is from a problem text, while all the others—the table of squares, the reciprocal table and Plimpton 322—are table texts, tablets consisting solely of tables of numbers. Several hundred table texts have been found, and many types of calculations appear to have been carried out by means of them. As well as squares and reciprocals, there are multiplication tables, tables of cubes and cube roots, tables of the sums of squares and cubes, combined tables where several of these are present, tables for working out compound interest, tables of weights and measures, and others. Numerical tables seem to have been a staple constituent of Babylonian life, as ubiquitous for them as is the pocket calculator for us today. Problem texts, by contrast, are rarer—only a hundred or so tablets have been found—and they seem to relate to an educational context of advanced scribal training. Early Mesopotamian culture had seen the development of specialised occupations, as a part of the newlydeveloping and highlycomplex urban structuring of the community, and the profession of scribe was central to the running of economic, bureaucratic and other aspects of the state. There were special institutions, schools, for training future scribes in the arts of writing, counting and accounting, and other necessary skills. (The attached pdf affords revealing glimpses into the scribal art and its training.)
It is in this educational context that the problem texts seem to have been written and used. Some merely give the problem and the answer (the one you saw in Question 1 was of this sort); others are fortunately more forthcoming on what to do to reach the answer. Let us look at one of these now.
Please read through the extract below to gain an impression of its style.
I have subtracted the side of my square for the area: 14, 30. You write down 1, the coefficient. You break off half of 1. 0; 30 and 0; 30 you multiply. You add 0; 15 to 14, 30. Result 14, 30; 15. This is the square of 29; 30. You add 0; 30, which you multiplied, to 29; 30. Result 30, the side of the square.
The problem is given in the first sentence, the rest is its solution. It turns out that after doing various things to the numbers initially given, the result 30 is reached. This indeed solves the original problem, for a square of side 30 has area 30^{2} = 900 (= 15,0 in sexagesimal), and subtracting 30 from 900 gives 870 (= 14,30). This is a problem of the kind we would call quadratic, that is, involving the square of some unknown number which is to be found. As a way in to understanding the Babylonian computational procedure for this problem, let us follow the instructions through in a modern algebraic format (and take into account later how far this may have distorted the Babylonian scribe's activity).
Let us call the unknown, the side, ‘x’; the coefficient, (which here is 1), call ‘b’; and the number in the statement of the problem (here, 14,30) call ‘c’. Then the problem is; to find x, where x^{2} − bx = c. The solution consists of taking the coefficient b, halving it, ½b squaring that, (½b)^{2}; adding this to the result, c+(½b)^{2}; taking the square root of that, √(c + (½b)^{2}); and finally adding the result to the halved coefficient ½b + √(c + (½b)^{2}); which is the answer. Indeed, this algebraic formula is just the same as we would reach (see Box 2 below), which is most satisfactory—or perhaps, on another consideration, somewhat alarming. If our method of understanding what the Babylonian scribe might have been doing is to turn him into a twentiethcentury algebraist, it is possible that there has been some misunderstanding.
Box 2: A note on solving quadratic equations
If we have a quadratic equation (a problem with one unknown, involving the square of that unknown but no higher power) in its standard form
then we find a solution by putting the values given for a, b and c inlo the formula
which can be obtained from the standard form of the original equation through a succession of algebraic operations called completing the square.
In the particular case of a quadratic equation of the form
into which the problem specified on the tablet fits, the procedure of completing the square goes as follows.
Take the coefficient b; halve it (½b); square that and then add it to both sides:
Then the left hand side is the square of (x − ^{1}/_{2}b that is,
so take the square root of both sides, giving
Finally, add ½b to both sides to give
Question 5
How does the symbolic description given above compare with what the Babylonian scribe did? Approach this by considering separately: (i) what similarities there are, and (ii) what differences there are.
Discussion

The sequence of instructions given by the scribe seems to follow quite closely the procedure called (in Box 2) completing the square, in terms of actions on theparticular numbers specified at the outset.
You may have noticed another similarity if you pondered the way in which the Babylonian problem was formulated. As with the stone of Question 1, the scribe seems to be labelling the unknown in an abstract, symbolic way. To see this, consider the alternative possibility that this is a realistically geometrical problem, as the words side and area seem, on the face of it, to imply. Surely the formulation of taking a side away from an area does not really make sense 10 our way of thinking about geometry (apart from conjuring up imagery of farmers ploughing up hedgerows). They are different kinds of things–taking away a hedge does not alter the numerical measure of the area that was previously enclosed. So either Babylonian geometry was quite different from ours, or they were using the terms side and area not as meaning geometrical entities particularly, but more as unknown and square of the unknown. In other words, side referred to some number to be discovered, with no connotations of where it came from or what, if anything, it measured. This is similar, perhaps, to the way we speak of x squared without necessarily imagining a square.

I expect you observed that there are major notational differences. It is worth noting that these are of three sorts: our ‘x’ for unknown, our ‘b’ and ‘c’ for fixed numbers, where we do not want to be specific about what they are, and all the other symbols (+, √, =, and so on). The latter seem fairly harmless translations of Babylonian words and operations in this case.
It has been argued above that our x and their side are conceptually more similar than they may first sight. But in changing their numbers into our ‘b’ and ‘c’ we effected a rather dramatic conceptual change. There is nothing in the Babylonian text paralleling our formula, a structure in which all the contributions of the original coefficients are still evident.
But bear in mind that our ‘formula’ only makes sense through our understanding the conventions about the order in which the operations it embodies are to be performed. Given a formula like √(c + (½b)^{2}), we are taught to interpret it as, ‘square ½b, then add c, before taking the square root…’, which is beginning to sound like Babylonian instructions again. Indeed, the parallel is all the more marked in the computational techniques developed over the last couple of decades Solving a quadratic equation on a pocket calculator or computer involves carrying out a sequenced program of operations closely mirroring the instructions on the Babylonian tablet, even down to pushing the ‘square root’ button at just the stage the scribe would have leant over to consult his square root tables.
All the problem texts that have solutions are of this sort, apparently instructing about a general approach through particular instances. In some cases, all the answers on a particular tablet turn out to be the same, which seems a clear indication that it was the journey rather than the destination that mattered. This is confirmed by details within the calculations. For instance, sometimes a number is explicitly multiplied by 1, which seems pointless until one realises that, in general, it might be some number other than 1 at that stage. This serves as a reminder that some multiplication is to be done there.
Archive content
This is an extract from an Open University course which is no longer available to new students. If you found this interesting you could explore more free Mathematics courses or view the range of currently available OU Mathematics courses.
Comments
Be the first to post a comment
Copyright & revisions
Publication details

Originally published: Friday, 8th July 2011
Copyright information
 CreativeCommons: The Open University is proud to release this free course under a Creative Commons licence. However, any thirdparty materials featured within it are used with permission and are not ours to give away. These materials are not subject to the Creative Commons licence. See terms and conditions. Full details can be found in the Acknowledgements section.
 This site has Copy Reuse Tracking enabled  see our FAQs for more information.
Feeds
If you enjoyed this, why not follow a feed to find out when we have new things like it? Choose an RSS feed from the list below. (Don't know what to do with RSS feeds?)
Remember, you can also make your own, personal feed by combining tags from around OpenLearn.
Alternative formats
Tags, Ratings and Social Bookmarking
Page Tags
Sign in or create a free account to add tags to your OpenLearn profile
About this site
OpenLearn: free learning from The Open University