from The Open University
Alternatively you can skip the navigation by pressing 'Enter'.
- Wednesday 12:04, BBC Radio 4, A History of Ideas
- Wednesday 12:04, BBC Radio 4, A History of Ideas - Historian Justin Champion on Francis Bacon
- Wednesday 16:00, BBC Radio 4, Thinking Allowed: Migraines - social stigma and negative labels
- Wednesday 16:00, BBC Radio 4, OU on the BBC: Thinking Allowed
- Thursday 12:04, BBC Radio 4, A History of Ideas
Detecting Down’s syndrome in the unborn fetus
Down's syndrome is the condition that is screened for the most in pregnant women...
Down's syndrome is the condition that is screened for the most in pregnant women because of the increased risk with the increasing age of mothers. This unit describes several bioanalytical tests, and how these are used in conjunction with scans to screen and diagnose the condition.
After studying this unit you should be able to:
- explain the differences between screening and diagnosis
- identify the main physical and biological techniques used in screening for Down’s syndrome
- appreciate the principles of assessing risk based on new information and how it is related to obtaining a revised risk factor for Down’s syndrome
- assess the risks and benefits of diagnostic procedures for Down’s syndrome such as amniocentesis and appreciate the ethical issues associated with screening and diagnosis
- understand the polymerase chain reaction technique.
- Learning outcomes
- 1 Screening the fetus
- 1.1 What is Down’s syndrome?
- 1.2 Screening for DS
- 1.3 Screening in the first trimester of pregnancy
- 1.4 Ultrasound imaging
- 1.5 Biochemical first trimester tests for DS
- 1.6 Screening tests in the second trimester
- Current section: 1.7 Calculating the risk factor
- 2 Balancing the risk with ethical issues related to Down’s syndrome
- 3 Diagnosing Down’s syndrome
1.7 Calculating the risk factor
The results of each of the screening tests are compared with the population median values for unaffected pregnancies to produce risk modifiers or likelihood ratios. Each of these is used to modify the mother’s risk of carrying a fetus with DS due to her age alone (known as the ‘a priori risk’) to calculate a combined risk. In the UK, the National Screening Committee (NSC) standards for first trimester combined screening state that pregnant women with a risk higher than 1 in 150 should be offered a diagnostic test. At this cut-off, the test should detect at least 80% of DS-affected pregnancies with an approximately 3% false positive rate.
There are several commercial computer-based algorithms available for calculating the revised risk factor for DS based on the outcome of the screening tests. For the first trimester test, these programs take a nuchal fold measurement of the fetus, and the MoM values for PAPP-A and hCG plus the maternal age to produce a revised risk factor. For the second trimester, the MoM values for the four maternal serum tests are obtained. The values are fed into the computer program which then produces a revised risk factor, which is determined from the risk factor derived from the known incidence of DS with maternal age. More sophisticated programs also take into account the weight, ethnicity, whether the woman smokes or has diabetes, and whether it is a multiple pregnancy; all of these factors either change the risk or affect the test results.
A pregnant woman aged 35 has a risk of 1 in 250 of having a child with DS based on age alone. She has a scan which shows an NT measurement of 3.0 mm and her serum has a MoM for PAPP-A of 0.4 and for hCG of 1.7. What do these data imply?
These measurements show that there is an increased risk, so the risk will go from 1 in 250 (which can also be written as 1 : 250) to whichever risk the computer calculates. This revised risk may be 1 in 50, but it also depends on the other factors mentioned above.
When a pregnant woman receives the results of her screening tests, and if her risk is raised, she may be offered a diagnostic test for DS or other chromosomal abnormalities. The risk of having a baby with DS may be quoted as being 1 in 100, whereas the risk of miscarrying a fetus after the invasive test may also be quoted as 1 in 100. How does the expectant mother weigh up these risks and decide whether to have an amniocentesis test? This very difficult decision is the subject of the next section.