Science, Maths & Technology

The Gravitational Constant

Updated Tuesday 1st June 2004

Dr Alan Cooper explains how the gravitational constant can be demonstrated through table-top experiments

Big G and Maskelyne

Each of the really fundamental force laws of nature is very general, and needs to be linked to our own particular universe by measuring the value of a universal constant embedded in the law.

In the case of Newton it is G, the gravitational constant (as distinct from g which is merely the acceleration at the surface of the Earth and so of local interest only).

Once you know G here, you know it everywhere in the Universe.

Maskelyne measured it in Scotland, in fact, in 1776. A mountain pulls a pendulum sideways and the Earth pulls it downwards. Measuring the (very small) deflection allows the pull of the mountain alone to be deduced, and that gives G.
graphical representation of the equation described Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission

Twenty years later, the Duke of Devonshire, Henry Cavendish, attempted the measurement of the attraction between metal spheres suspended in his laboratory. (Cavendish was a brilliant physicist little known because of his extremely retiring nature.)

Whereas the mass of the mountain Schiehallion had to be estimated, the masses of the spheres could be accurately measured. This was a bold and pioneering experiment, especially for a man nearing 70.

It was remarkably successful (only 2% above the true value) but it was a century before the same method could start to be refined, thanks to the invention of quartz fibres by C.V. Boys.

Even so, G has remained the most difficult of the basic physical constants to measure accurately. It is for this reason that astronomers adopted the practice of relating their measurements to the AU, rather than directly to the metre (Why this is important is discussed in What does the AU mean?) and that discussion of the AU is inevitably paralled by discussion of G.

The measurements are very elegant, but they create an odd situation. The value of G is used mainly to understand astrophysics on the grand scale, from stellar structure to galaxy formation to cosmology. Yet its measurement comes from almost literally table top experiments; an extrapolation by at least a million million million times.

The danger is clear; why should gravity be exactly the same on the different scales? For instance, classical physics did not survive the relatively modest extrapolation in the opposite direction, down to atomic scales; it was replaced by quantum physics. In the last ten years or so there have been attempts to look for a departure from the inverse square law at distances of tens of metres.

Methods similar to those of Cavendish had to be further developed to test the equally important question of whether gravitational pull depends on the composition of a body ("Would a polystyrene Earth have the same AU?") or only on mass. It is essential to the truth of General Relativity that it should not be related to composition.

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Discover Mercury: Volcanism, faults and hollows Creative commons image Icon The Open University under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license video icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

Discover Mercury: Volcanism, faults and hollows

What do we already know - or think we know - about the geology of Mercury?

Video
10 mins
Sky notes: January Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: OU image library article icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

Sky notes: January

A guide to the what's happening in the night sky in January.

Article
Passing through unseen: An introduction to dark matter Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: X-ray: NASA/CXC/CfA/M.Markevitch et al.; Optical: NASA/STScI; Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al.; Lensing Map: NASA/STScI; ESO WFI; Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al. article icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

Passing through unseen: An introduction to dark matter

Get to grips with dark matter - and find out why actually getting to grips with dark matter is impossible

Article

Science, Maths & Technology 

Moon Rocks

Researcher Mahesh Anand of The Open University's Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR) is undertaking analysis of lunar basalt collected during the moon landings of the late 1960s and 1970s. The results may provide clues into the origins of the earth. To find out more, follow the research links.

Video
5 mins
Deep Impact: Science or stunt - what are your views? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission article icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

Deep Impact: Science or stunt - what are your views?

Deep Impact is a major space mission, which promises to expand our knowledge of the nature of comets massively. But not everyone views the mission without some misgivings. Here's how two of our experts respond to the challenge: "Deep Impact: serious science, cosmic vandalism or independence day publicity stunt?"

Article
Extreme Astronomy Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: ESA-Ducros article icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

Extreme Astronomy

Dr. Robin Barnard reveals the way that astronomers hunt for black holes, exploding stars and other extremes of astronomy

Article
Discover Mercury: What inspires and drives you? Creative commons image Icon The Open University under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license video icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

Discover Mercury: What inspires and drives you?

What is it about Mercury that attracts scientists to study the planet?

Video
10 mins
60 Second Adventures in Astronomy: Gaia and the Killer Asteroids video icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

60 Second Adventures in Astronomy: Gaia and the Killer Asteroids

How does Gaia detect any dangerous Earth-crossing asteroids? 

Video
Virtual Microscope activity icon

Science, Maths & Technology 

Virtual Microscope

Examine moon rocks and meteorites up close with our Virtual Microscope

Activity