Skip to content
Society, Politics & Law

Despite sanctions, North Korea's nuclear programme is enjoying success. How?

Updated Wednesday 9th August 2017

Despite over a decade of sanctions, North Korea has pursued an ever-more-successful program aimed at developing nuclear weapons. So, asks Daniel Salisbury, have sanctions failed?

North Korean soldiers pictured in 2010 Creative commons image Icon Roman Harak under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license A 2010 picture showing North Korean soldiers

North Korea’s successful test of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), allegedly with the capability to hit Alaska, is the latest in a series of significant advances for the country’s missile program.

North Korea has been seeking to develop long-range missile technology for over 20 years. For much of this period, the international community has been trying to stop that from happening.

My research on how states illegally obtain missile technologies and my experience conducting outreach related to U.N. sanctions give me some insight into the methods North Korea used to make illicit procurements and the limitations in using technology-based sanctions to prevent them.

Technology-based sanctions

In 2006 – following North Korea’s first nuclear test – the U.N. Security Council prohibited the “supply, sale or transfer” of “items, materials, equipment, goods and technology” that could contribute to the country’s missile program.

Efforts to prevent North Korea’s acquisition of missile technology by certain nations – notably the United States – were underway by the 1990s. However, the U.N. sanctions went further by placing standardized legal requirements on all states to prevent the development of North Korea’s weapons of mass destruction programs.

These sanctions are “universal” – obligatory for all states around the world. However, each nation is responsible for implementation within its borders. Missile, nuclear and military technologies are regulated through national export control systems. Exports of certain goods and technologies need to be granted an export license by the government. This allows governments to do a risk assessment on transactions and minimize the diversions to undesirable uses, such as WMD programs or human rights abuses.

Since the passage of U.N. Security Council resolution 1540 in 2004, having an export control system has been mandatory for states. In theory, this should give all countries the capacity to implement technology-based sanctions. However, more than a decade after UNSCR 1540 was passed, many states – particularly developing countries – are still struggling to put in place effective systems to implement the legislation.

This has led to uneven implementation of missile-related sanctions on North Korea. A recent report has described the U.N. sanctions regime as a “house without foundations,” noting that not a single element of the sanctions regime “enjoys robust international implementation.”

Sources of missile technology

As North Korea’s missile program has advanced, its sources of missile technology have evolved.

North Korea began by importing full missile systems and seeking to reverse-engineer or replicate them. For example, after procuring short-range Scud missiles from Egypt in the late 1970s, North Korea had replicated, or “reverse-engineered,” them by the mid-1980s. The 1990s saw North Korea develop the Nodong, a scaled-up Scud design. It also experimented with longer-range missiles in the late 1990s and mid-2000s. These Taepodong missiles drew together elements of the shorter-range systems such as their engines. The Taepodong-2 allegedly had an intercontinental range, although it was never successfully tested.

Since taking power in 2011, Kim Jong-Un has accelerated North Korea’s missile program. In the past year alone, the country has tested four seemingly new missiles for the first time – including a submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM) and an intermediate range ballistic missile, as well as the ICBM tested this week.

The country has also sought to learn how to produce required parts and components at home. North Korea’s program is opaque, and the balance between reliance on external sources and indigenization is unclear, but some episodes provide insights.

Rocket debris salvaged from the sea following a satellite launch in December 2012 suggested an ongoing reliance on the international market place for parts. A 2013 U.N. report suggested the rocket had used modern components sourced from China, Switzerland, the U.K. and the U.S., as well as “cannibalized” Scud components and other 1980s vintage Soviet parts.

Since then, North Korea has continued to pursue more advanced manufacturing technologies. Footage from the leadership’s frequent factory visits has shown that North Korea has acquired advanced computer numerically controlled (CNC) machine tools which are of use in missile and nuclear programs. Photographs from the recent parade in April 2017 suggest that North Korea’s new SLBM was constructed with wound filament. This material is lighter and stronger than aluminum, and a significant step forward in capability.

Evading sanctions

To make these advances in their missile program, North Korea has had to evade sanctions and the broader scrutiny of the international community. Their illicit procurement techniques include using front companies, obscuring the end user, falsifying documentation and mislabeling cargo. A 2017 U.N. report notes that North Korea’s evasion techniques are “increasing in scale, scope and sophistication.”

North Korea’s military and WMD procurement networks are global in nature. According to one study, they have touched more than 60 countries.

Due to geographical proximity, historic relationship and broader trading links, China has played an unparalleled role in these networks. Many middlemen and procurement agents have operated in China, and increasingly – as the country’s private sector develops – its manufacturers have been a source of technology. A series of revelations in early 2017 demonstrated that Chinese manufacturers and Chinese-North Korean joint ventures are benefiting North Korea’s missile program – including with machine tools, components and materials.

The effects of sanctions?

With North Korea’s successful ICBM test – and a range of other nuclear, missile and military advances – observers might rightfully ask: Have sanctions failed? This question is complicated. It might be more useful to consider what the effects of sanctions have been.

The primary objectives of technology-based sanctions have been to slow and prevent North Korea’s nuclear and missile development. The recent ICBM test clearly proves these measures have not prevented North Korea’s missile development. Whether they slowed progress is debatable.

What is undeniable is that sanctions have had unforeseen consequences. Research suggests that sanctions could have made North Korea’s procurement efforts more sophisticated as Chinese middlemen monetize the risk.

The ConversationAmericans tend to view North Korea as an inward-looking, economically isolated state cut off from the international community. However, the country’s illicit networks – including those supplying its missile program – are global and responsive. Ultimately, they will be difficult to counter.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.


For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

How Trump's 'fire and fury' threatens to destabilise the Asian Pacific region Copyright free image Icon Copyright free: Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Samuel Guerra article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

How Trump's 'fire and fury' threatens to destabilise the Asian Pacific region

Donald Trump's strongman rhetoric in the face of North Korean provocations is a risk for the whole region, believes Genevieve Hohnen.

Laibach and think of North Korea: The subversive political message of the Slovenian band Creative commons image Icon Laibach under CC-BY-SA under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license article icon

History & The Arts 

Laibach and think of North Korea: The subversive political message of the Slovenian band

Having accepted a booking to play North Korea, Laibach are suddenly achieving more attention than they've had in the rest of their thirty-five year career combined. But is the casual dismissal of their music as fascists missing something deeper in their art?

Elections, oil and a Chinese dam in Ghana Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Giles Mohan article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Elections, oil and a Chinese dam in Ghana

After a visit to Ghana, Giles Mohan discusses their economy and the involvement of the Chinese in their energy production.

Uganda: Biography Of A Nation Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Production team article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Uganda: Biography Of A Nation

Discover more about this diverse country, its people, history, government and economy in an article by Carolyn Baxter entitled 'Uganda - an overview'

How the Millennium Development Goals failed the world’s poorest children Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: © Dean Bertoncelj | article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

How the Millennium Development Goals failed the world’s poorest children

As we reach the end of the period set to achieve the UN Millennium Goals, Anna Childs says the world is way-off target.

On reggae island Creative commons image Icon by Chrysaora under CC-BY-NC-ND licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

On reggae island

Jamaica has lost its way since its progressive 1970s, and an air of fatalism hangs over reggae island

Global data: the importance of perspective Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Global data: the importance of perspective

The importance of perspective when interpreting global data on the poor and the rich in the 21st Century world.

Never the twain? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Never the twain?

Inspired by the 2008 Reith Lectures, our community debated if the people living in the East are fundamentally different from those living in the West. Forum member Weiminfuwu borrowed a line or two from Kipling to ask if people living in the West and their counterparts in the East see things differently.

Global migration map Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: In house activity icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Global migration map

Where do migrants come from - and where do they go to? Our interactive map tracks just some of the significant migration patterns