Skip to content

OU on the BBC: Reith Lectures 2009: A New Citizenship - Morality in politics

In the second of the 2009 Reith Lectures, Michael Sandel considers whether there is a role for moral argument in politics and maintains that it is not always possible, or desirable, to decide public questions while being neutral on moral questions in Morality in Politics

08 Jun
2009

Jupiter Images civil partnership ceremony

Listen to the lecture in full

What is the role, if any, for moral argument in politics? Some say none. In pluralist societies, people disagree on morality and religion, so politics and law should, ideally at least, be neutral with respect to those controversies.

According to this view, citizens should set aside their particular moral and religious identities when they engage in public discourse, and offer reasons that everyone can accept.

In Lecture 2, Sandel makes the case for a more expansive public discourse, hospitable to moral and even religious argument. The attempt to keep morality and religions out of politics arises from a legitimate fear – the worry that religious fundamentalists, for example, will impose intolerant and coercive laws and practices. But Sandel argues that it’s not always possible to decide public questions while being neutral on moral questions; and even where it’s possible, it may not be desirable.

Consider, for example, some of the hotly contested social and cultural issues of contemporary politics: the debates over abortion rights, stem cell research, and same-sex marriage. Some argue that we should resolve these debates, not by delving into the moral and religious disagreements that underlie them, but rather on the basis of neutral principles of freedom of choice and non-discrimination. But Sandel tries to show why these issues can’t be resolved on neutral grounds. We can’t avoid delving into the underlying controversies.

What, then, would a more morally engaged public discourse look like? It would not only address familiar disputes about sexual practices and reproductive choices. It would also take up a broader range of social and economic questions. A public debate about the moral limits of markets (as discussed in Lecture 1) would be one example. A renewed debate about the moral and civic implications of inequality, and about the mutual obligations of citizens, would be another.

In short, a more robust, morally engaged public discourse – reaching economic as well as social and cultural issues – is an important element of a new citizenship.

First broadcast: Tuesday 23 Jun 2009 on BBC Radio 4

Reith Lectures 2009: A New Citizenship in more depth:

Rate and share this page:

You haven't rated. Average rating 5 out of 5, based on 2 ratings

Share this page:

.

More like this

Comments

Be the first to post a comment.

Login or Register to post comments

Article Information

Publication details

Copyright information
• Body text - Copyrighted: BBC
• Image 'civil partnership ceremony' - Copyrighted: Jupiter Images

About OpenLearn

Hide

Explore

Try

Study

OU Courses

Open University

OpenLearn Now

Hide
Dickens: Want some more? Copyrighted Image iStock

Delve into the world of Dickens on his bicentenary.

Tag Clouds

Hide

My Cloud

Discover the latest about your passions - Sign In or Register and start a personal tag cloud.

What are Tag Clouds?
http://www.open.edu/openlearn/sites/all/themes/ole/flash/tagcloud.swf

Creative Commons License Except for third party materials and otherwise stated, content on this site is made available
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Licence

/openlearn/sites/all/themes/ole/