Skip to content
Education & Development
Author:

Young people and stress, vulnerability and resilience

Updated Monday, 21st October 2019

Is risk and adversity damaging to young people? Not necessarily, writes John Oates...

The emotional well-being of children and young people depends on them experiencing the right sorts of nurturing environments.  It also depends on them not being exposed to excessive risks to their development; but children and young people seem to differ in how resilient they are if they do experience challenges. Risk and resilience are complex and much debated concepts throughout the social sciences but have become increasingly central to studying children’s and adolescent’s lives over the past 20 years, as researchers try to understand why different risk factors have different impacts on different individuals. Using a variety of methods and coming from various disciplinary and philosophical backgrounds these researchers have asked questions such as ‘Why do some children and young people cope with adversity while others do not?’ or: ‘Why are some children and young people overwhelmed by difficulties which others overcome relatively easily?’. Developmental psychologists have been at the forefront of these studies but have drawn on, and worked in close collaboration with, social workers, public health officials, sociologists, anthropologists, geneticists and neuroscientists. There are, however, no standard definitions of resilience, or agreement on how it can be measured or whether it is an outcome in itself or a process.

It could be said that children and young people who have never suffered adversity are disadvantaged when they become adults Siblings, and even identical twins, can be different in temperament and despite similar upbringings react in opposing ways. Psychologists have used various models to explain why different children and young people react differently to the same risks. One, the diathesis-stress model, is based on the idea that each individual has their own specific stress threshold, above which there are negative effects, either on immediate behaviour or on longer-term outcomes. ‘Diathesis’, from the Greek word for ‘disposition’, refers to the assumption that through genetic variation, effects on the foetus through pregnancy or early experiences, each individual comes to have their unique ‘stress threshold’.

Other models, such as the differential sensitivity model suggests that individuals differ in their responses to environmental stress, not in terms of thresholds, as in the diathesis-stress model, but instead in their profiles of response to different levels of stress. This model is based more on a ‘sensitive versus robust’ model of differences, such that ‘sensitive’ individuals may respond more negatively to high levels of stress than ‘robust’ individuals, but may also respond more positively to less stressful, more supportive environments than ‘robust’ individuals.

Not all forms of risk or adversity are necessarily harmful. Some degree of adversity and stress is an inevitable part of human life and learning to cope with them is an important part of the developmental process. It could be said that children and young people who have never suffered adversity are disadvantaged when they become adults, because they have not developed coping mechanisms and may react inappropriately when confronted with situations they have no resources to deal with. Some psychologists argue that stress is not always harmful to children and young people; it can be tolerable or even beneficial and several experiences, such as starting  changing secondary schools or having a new sibling as a teenager, can become positive learning experiences, as long as the young person has the necessary support to deal with them. In line with Donald Winnicott’s concept of ‘good-enough’ parenting, which argues that children benefit from some delays or failures in fully meeting their needs and wishes, there is evidence that exposure to mild levels of stress that a child or young person can cope with, ‘inoculates’ against the effects of stress later in the life span. Three types of stress can be distinguished.

  • beneficial stress, as mentioned above;
  • tolerable stress i.e. severe but still usually short-lived stress such as a death in the close family, or parental divorce. Although this often poses higher risks to children and young people, with the right support from caring adults, they can adapt and cope without it having long term negative impacts or interfering with their development;
  • toxic stress: when adverse experiences faced by a child or young person are chronic, repetitive, uncontrollable, and/or experienced without having access to support from caring adults. Such stress poses long term and very harmful risks to children in that it can interfere with their physical and emotional development

This is topic explored further in The Open University module E219 Psychology of Childhood and Youth, chapter 12.

 

Become

Author

Share

Related content (tags)

Copyright information

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?