◄Previous: 4.4 Activity 3: Working through a scenario

# 4.5 References

Aizpurua, A., Arrue, M., Harper, S., and Vigo, M. (2014) ‘Are users the gold standard for accessibility evaluation?’, in Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference. ACM. Article 13. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2596705&CFID=945935323&CFTOKEN=59625762 (accessed 08 June 2017).

Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y., and Harper, S. (2010) ‘Testability and validity of WCAG 2.0: the expertise effect’, in Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM. pp. 43–50. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1878813&CFID=945935323&CFTOKEN=59625762 (accessed 08 June 2017).

Cooper, M., Colwell, C., and Jelfs, A. (2007) ‘Embedding accessibility and usability: considerations for eLearning research and development projects’, Research in Learning Technology, volume 15, issue 3 pp. 231–245. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09687760701673659 (accessed 08 June 2017).

Cooper, M., Sloan, D., Kelly, B., and Lewthwaite, S. (2012) ‘A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: putting people and processes first’, in Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility. ACM. Article 20. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2207028&CFID=945935323&CFTOKEN=59625762 (accessed 08 June 2017).

Coughlan, T., Ullmann, T. D. and Lister, K. (2017). ‘Understanding accessibility as a process through the analysis of feedback from disabled students’, in: W4A’17 International Web for All Conference, ACM, New York, USA., (In Press). Available at http://oro.open.ac.uk/48991/1/Webforall17-v3-cameraready.pdf (accessed 08 June 2017).

Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Brown, S., Seale, J., Petrie, H., Lauke, P., and Ball, S. (2007) ‘Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes’, in Proceedings of the international crossdisciplinary conference on Web accessibility. ACM. pp. 138–147. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1243471&CFID=945935323&CFTOKEN=59625762 (accessed 08 June 2017).

Kumar, K.L. and Owston, R. (2016) ‘Evaluating e-learning accessibility by automated and student-centered methods’, Education Tech Research Development, April 2016, vol. 64, issue 2, pp. 263–283. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-015-9413-6 (accessed 08 June 2017).

Power, C., Freire, A., Petrie, H., and Swallow, D. (2012) ‘Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM. pp.433–442. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2207736&CFID=945935323&CFTOKEN=59625762 (accessed 08 June 2017).

Sloan, D., Heath, A., Hamilton, F., Kelly, B., Petrie, H., and Phipps, L. (2006) ‘Contextual web accessibility – maximizing the benefit of accessibility guidelines’, in Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility. ACM. pp. 121–131. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1133242&CFID=945935323&CFTOKEN=59625762 (accessed 08 June 2017).

W3C WAI (2010) ‘Involving users in evaluating web accessibility’. Available at https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/users (accessed 08 June 2017).

◄Contents►Next: Conclusion

OpenLearn - Accessibility of eLearning
Except for third party materials and otherwise, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence, full copyright detail can be found in the acknowledgements section. Please see full copyright statement for details.