Changes in Science Education
Changes in Science Education

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

Free course

Changes in Science Education

7.3 Multiple interpretations in science

Talking of media reports of the Chernobyl episode, Millar and Wynne point out that:

[disagreements between scientists] become difficult to interpret, other than in terms of bias or incompetence. Divergences between the data and interpretations of pressure groups … and the official sources are attributed to the former [bias]; those between different official agencies … to the latter [incompetence]. Only in a handful of the more reflective [newspaper] articles … is there any suggestion that such conflicts are a product of an inherently messy and inexact measuring process, and the sort of data that were wanted are, in principle, unobtainable.

(Millar and Wynne, 1988)

Thus one more requirement is added to what a curriculum for science literacy needs to deliver – a recognition that science professionals in disagreement about the interpretation of data can be a legitimate feature of science.

The Chernobyl episode in the media also raised queries about the degree of risk involved via radioactive contamination. Here too there were problems of representation, both in scientific and political contexts. Predictions about the degree of risk changed in the aftermath of the event, as shifts in the prevailing winds brought more of the radioactivity from the explosion closer to the UK; naturally enough, this triggered media consternation, with accusations of political complacency. Estimating the level of risk faced by UK citizens proved problematic; estimates offered by the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) were of a ‘few tens of deaths over the next 50 years’. The sparse data to hand and uncertainty about the links between level of exposure and the likelihood of developing cancer meant that figures were ‘best guesses’. But when such a phrase was used in public, there were concerns that approximations of this sort were unacceptably loose. Indeed, some politicians felt that such imprecise pronouncements were unhelpful and ‘unscientific’. The fact that extrapolation from meagre data and informed guesswork is typical of much of this type of data of public relevance was not highlighted in the media, but rather the NRPB's competence and motives were questioned. It is clear then that making sense of such an episode, in terms of the reliability of the data, was far from straightforward and the difficulty of producing authoritative data in such circumstances was largely unrecognised and unreported.


Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has 50 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications. You could either choose to start with an Access module, or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification. Read our guide on Where to take your learning next for more information.

Not ready for formal University study? Then browse over 1000 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus371