Investigating a murder with forensic psychology
Skip contents

Contents

  • Introduction
  • 1 Psychology and investigations
    • 1.1 Meet the psychological team
    • 1.2 Fictional detectives
  • 2Police briefing and timeline
    • 2.1 Senior Investigating Officer – police briefing
    • 2.2 Using timelines in investigations
    • 2.3 Creating and using your own timeline
  • 3 The initial witness interview
    • 3.1 Introducing the police team
    • 3.2 DS Sund interviews Neale Anderson
    • 3.3 Evaluation of DS Sund’s interview
    • 3.4 Observations about DS Sund and the witness
    • 3.5 Credibility of the witness
  • 4 Detecting deception
    • 4.1 Psychological theory and research on detecting deception
    • 4.2 Applying detecting deception research
  • 5 New witness statements
  • 6 Summary of Week 1
  • Introduction
  • 1 Types of interview
    • 1.1 The introduction of PACE in England and Wales
    • 1.2 The PEACE model
    • 1.3 The legal caution
  • 2 Planning topics for Neale’s interview
  • 3 How to talk to suspects in police interviews
  • 4 The importance of rapport
    • 4.1 Rapport – an introduction to the interpersonal circle
    • 4.2 Diagnosis of behaviour using the interpersonal circle
    • 4.3 How rapport is applied in criminal investigations
    • 4.4 Adaptive and maladaptive variants of the interpersonal circle
    • 4.5 Rapport principles
  • 5 DI Bullet interviews Neale
    • 5.1 Suspect interview by DI Bullet: Part 1
    • 5.2 Rating DI Bullet’s interview skills
    • 5.3 Expert analysis of the interview so far from
  • 6 Summary of Week 2
  • Introduction
  • 1 Suspect interview by DI Bullet: Part 2
    • 1.1 Perceptions of guilt
    • 1.2 Considering questioning techniques
    • 1.3 Evaluating questioning techniques
  • 2 Interrogation, suggestibility and false confessions
    • 2.1 A look at real criminal cases: The Innocence Project
    • 2.2 The psychology of false confessions
    • 2.3 Interrogative suggestibility
    • 2.4 Suggestibility and the Reid technique
  • 3 Evaluating DI Bullet’s suspect interview
    • 3.1 Evaluating Part 2 of DI Bullet’s suspect interview
    • 3.2 The psychological team’s evaluation
    • 3.3 Is Neale’s interview confession true or false?
    • 3.4 Reporting back to the SIO
    • 3.5 The expert view on the confession
  • 4 New evidence and new suspects
    • 4.1 Important new evidence
    • 4.2 Three additional suspects
    • 4.3 Route of enquiry
    • 4.4 Biases
    • 4.5 Biases in an investigation
  • 5 Summary of Week 3
  • Introduction
  • 1 Dealing with the new suspect
    • 1.1 Evidence and testing the truthfulness of a suspects account
    • 1.2 Return to the timeline
    • 1.3 Planning what to disclose
    • 1.4 The psychological team’s thoughts on what to disclose
  • 2 Interviewing the new suspect
    • 2.1 Planning for rapport with Mick Brough
    • 2.2 Interviewer rapport strategies
    • 2.3 DS Sund’s interview of Mick Brough
    • 2.4 DS Sund interviews Mick Brough
    • 2.5 Noting discrepancies on the timeline
  • 3 Assessment of the suspect interview and case closure 
    • 3.1 Your assessment of the suspect Mick Brough
    • 3.2 An assessment of Mick Brough as a suspect
    • 3.3 SIO and the two detectives debrief the case
  • 4 Conclusion of the case
  • 5 Course summary
  • Where next?
  • References
  • Acknowledgements
  • Glossary

ou logoCreative Commons non-commercial share alike icon Except for third party materials and otherwise stated in the acknowledgements section, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence

Please see full copyright statement and terms of use for more details.