The Enlightenment
The Enlightenment

This free course is available to start right now. Review the full course description and key learning outcomes and create an account and enrol if you want a free statement of participation.

Free course

The Enlightenment

8.3 Enlightenment, humanity and revolution

8.3.1 Humanity

We have seen from Diderot's article ‘Encyclopedia’ that the philosophes were convinced that their mission was for the benefit of their fellow human beings. For all of them, concern for humanity was the mainspring of their ideas and activities. The article on ‘Fanaticism’ (by Alexandre Deleyre) in the Encydopédie sums up what they most bitterly opposed:

Fanaticismis blind and passionate zeal born of superstitious opinions, causing people to commit ridiculous, unjust, and cruel actions, not only without any shame or remorse, but even with a kind of joy and comfort. Fanaticism, therefore, is only superstition put into practice.

(Gendzier, 1967, p. 104)

At the heart of the fight against fanaticism was Voltaire. His plea for religious toleration – Écrasez I'infâme! (crush the infamous thing) – was the slogan with which he branded fanaticism and its attendant ills. But his protests combined prolific and eloquent criticism in print with the personal championing of individual cases. The most famous instance of I'infâme was the case of Jean Calas in 1762. Calas, a Protestant from Toulouse, was wrongfully convicted of having murdered his son for converting to Catholicism. (The young man had committed suicide.) Calas was condemned to death by the high court at Toulouse. The horrible sentence of breaking on the wheel was carried out. After a long and energetic campaign by Voltaire, the verdict was quashed. The triumph for Voltaire and Enlightenment – the Europe-wide publicity for the cause of reason, justice, penal reform and religious toleration – was spectacular.

The Enlightenment's concern for humanitarian reform fuelled the ambitions of the generation that came to maturity on the eve of the Revolution. The Encydopédie popularised notions of equality and natural rights which had become commonplace by 1789. This concept of the rights that should come to us at birth was not, however, normally related to more modern notions of equality of wealth and power. The Enlightenment was always conscious of what Boswell called ‘the superiority of cultivated minds over the gross and illiterate’ (Boswell, 1951, vol.2, p. 133) and of the fragility of civilisation in the face of riot and disorder. It was not until after the period covered by our course, in the middle decades of the nineteenth century, that there was any real extension of political rights to the masses. But there was a common conviction, propagated by the philosophes, that everyone had the right to equal justice before the law and the right not to be exploited by those enjoying power and privilege. Once again the cries for political reform were particularly strident in France, where injustice and inequality, long subject to Enlightenment criticism, were no longer felt to be tolerable.

In a broader sense, a concern for humanity manifested itself in a conviction of universal rights: everyone was entitled to be treated in a way fitting their dignity as a human being. In his poem The Task (1785) Cowper expressed his sorrow at man's inhumanity to man:

There is no flesh in man's obdúrate heart,

It does not feel for man; the natural bond

Of brotherhood is severed as the flax

That falls asunder at the touch of fire.

He finds his fellow guilty of a skin

Not coloured like his own, and having power

To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause

Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.

(Benham, 1902, pp. 198–9)

The philosophes spoke out with a united voice against the slave trade. Voltaire and Diderot were among many who protested against it in the name of man's common humanity. Cugoano, in his Thoughts and Sentiments on the Evils of Slavery, used the term ‘enlightened’ to denote a humane code of conduct opposed to slavery, although not all Enlightenment thinkers expressed such opposition, so deeply entrenched was the practice in contemporary economic and political thought and activity. Boswell defended slavery, while Johnson opposed it. The ex-slave Robert Wedderburn (1762–1835), author of The Horrors of Slavery (1824) cited the Enlightenment authorities of truth, justice and the ancients in his vehement critique of the practice.

Summary point: humanitarianism and a concern with common human rights were central to the Enlightenment mission. In some, if not all, thinkers this led to an impulse to attack common inhumane practices such as religious oppression and slavery.

Exercise 7

Turn now to your AV Notes (click on 'View document' below), which will direct you to watch section 4 ‘Humanity and the noble savage’. When you have worked through this section of the video and attempted the exercise in the notes, return to this course.

Click 'View document' [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] to read the notes and exercise for video 4

Click on the blank screen below to start playing video 4 'Humanity and the noble savage'

Download this video clip.Video player: Humanity and the noble savage
Skip transcript: Humanity and the noble savage

Transcript: Humanity and the noble savage

TONY LENTIN
The Philosoph’s passion for the classics was paralleled by their interest in non- Europeans like the heroes and philosophers of ancient Greece and Rome they were appealing because they were different.
The ancient civilisation of China was greatly respected, the cultivated ruling class of Mandarins were admired and the exquisite artistry was highly valued. Eastern religions were thought to be based on reason and natural morality rather than revelation and dogma.
India was well-known in Britain through the activities of the East India Company. British artists depicted their Indian contacts as exotic and elegant. Englishmen themselves were sometimes portrayed in Indian dress.
And there were even occasional marriages between Englishmen and Indian women.
But one of the most lasting enlightenment concepts on man and human nature was the noble savage.
The phrase embodied a Utopian dream of an earthly paradise, a golden age in which man was good, living freely and innocently without need of laws or churches.
The vision of the noble savage received a huge boost with Captain Cook’s discovery of the South Sea Islands and Australia. Artists portrayed cultures, which were sexually liberated and therefore, free.
The noble savage became a cult in high society. The Polynesian Prince Omi was brought from Tahiti to England in 1774 after Cook’s second voyage.
He was celebrated in London society and his portrait was painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds, he was admired by enlightened thinkers for what they saw his natural charm and dignity uncorrupted by artificial social convention.
However, much of society did not extend this benevolence towards Africans or Afro- Caribbean’s. While the Pacific Islanders were idealised. Africans were portrayed as inferior, a convenient view for those who benefited from the brutal but highly lucrative slave trade.
But the Philosophs were uncompromising in their objection to slavery.
QUOTE
‘This buying of Negro’s to reduce them to slavery is one business that violates, religion, morality, natural laws and all the rights of human nature.’
TONY LENTIN
In a very few cases former African slaves themselves became enlightenment thinkers and were accepted as part of the circle.
Olaudah Equiano was born in what is now Nigeria, he served as a slave boy in the Royal Navy he then struggled in the West Indies to buy his freedom from his white master.
Eventually he emigrated to England and became a moderately prosperous Christian Englishman. In his Autobiography he writes against the horrors of slavery
Another well-known black writer in Britain was Ignatius Sancho he was born on a slave ship in 1729 and was sold as a child in London but managed to become acquainted with London society, Sancho wrote novels and music and became part of the London Literary scene. Successful former slaves such as Equiano and Sancho vindicated enlightenment belief in basic human equality.
End transcript: Humanity and the noble savage
Copy this transcript to the clipboard
Print this transcript
Humanity and the noble savage
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

As a young man, Voltaire had had two spells in the Bastille for impertinence towards members of the nobility, and the injustice and indignity rankled. Yet Voltaire, who later became immensely rich, was no social radical. The philosophes in general contributed little to political thought as such; they hardly troubled about which might be the best form of government for implementing their cherished reforms. Montesquieu, in his erudite and influential De l'esprit des lois (On the Spirit of the Laws, 1748), advocated a system of institutional checks and balances, and the separation or balancing of executive (governing) power, legislative (lawmaking) power and judicial power (the power of the judges) in order to counter the unlimited exercise of state power by the executive (the king). Montesquieu and Voltaire were much impressed by Britain's constitutional or ‘limited’ monarchy, in which the monarch's powers were curbed by a partly representative assembly (Parliament) and an independent judiciary. Britain was often compared favourably with absolute monarchy in France. But Voltaire, who had long since popularised British values in his Philosophical Letters or Letters on the English (1734), was also attracted by enlightened models of absolute monarchy, such as those practised in the second half of the eighteenth century by Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia, Joseph II of Austria (Mozart's patron), Gustav III of Sweden and Charles III of Spain. Voltaire, who was for a time historiographer royal to Louis XV until his independence and propensity for mischief-making made the court too hot to hold him, was moderate, pragmatic, undogmatic, flexible, and politically and socially conservative. Europe's traditional social structure being, so it was thought, fixed and immutable, it mattered little how enlightenment was implemented as long as it was implemented.

Exercise 8

Turn now to your AV Notes (click on 'View document' below), which will direct you to watch section 5, ‘Frederick the Great and enlightened absolutism’. When you have worked through this section of the video and attempted the exercise in the notes, return to this course.

Click 'View document' to read the notes and exercise for video 5

Click on the blank screen below to start playing video 5 ‘Frederick the Great and enlightened absolutism’

Download this video clip.Video player: Frederick the Great and enlightened absolutism
Skip transcript: Frederick the Great and enlightened absolutism

Transcript: Frederick the Great and enlightened absolutism

TONY LENTIN
Frederick the Great was absolute ruler of Prussia from 1740 to 1786 he was a devotee of the enlightenment and shared many of it’s values. He was he said a king by duty and a Philosoph by inclination.
Frederick was culturally speaking a Francophile. He described Voltaire’s Candide as the only novel one can read and re-read. He called himself the Philosoph of Sans Souse. Sans Souse was the name he gave to the Rococo Pleasure Palace at Potsdam outside Berlin. He designed the palace himself and lived there for almost half a century He was a copious writer on many themes central to the enlightenment, his works extend to many volumes.
Frederick corresponded regularly with Voltaire, D’Alembert and other philosophs. Both men were guests of the king and D’Alembert recorded his impressions.
QUOTE
‘He talked to me about literature, philosophy, even politics and war and peace. I would need a whole volume to give you an idea of his conversation. All I can tell you is that the king impressed me as greater even than he is by reputation’
TONY LENTIN
Frederick championed the cause of science unlike Louis the fifteenth in France he had his people inoculated against smallpox. As he wrote.
‘Of a million people who have been inoculated at Berlin not one has died. ‘
Frederick was humanitarian but also a pragmatist. Under his brutal and unenlightened father Frederick William the first a mother found guilty of infanticide was sewn in a sack, thrown in a river and drowned. Frederick did away with all this. He tried to remove the stigma attached to unmarried mothers and provided maternity homes for them. It’s true that part of the impetus behind this humanitarian gesture was Prussia’s loss of men. Like the Philosoph’s Frederick admired classical antiquity, though he never left Germany to go on the grand tour.
In the grounds at Sans Souse Frederick erected statues of Roman Emperors. There were villains like the tyrannical Nero. But also heroes like Marcus Orealius whose stoic sense of duty he strove to emulate.
Frederick was attracted by aspects of non European culture, his interest in things Chinese finds expression in the Chinese Teahouse, which he’d put up in the park at Sans Souse. RPT Although he was nominally head of the Lutheran Church in Prussia, Frederick allowed complete freedom of religion. He wrote to Voltaire,
QUOTE
‘You suppose that I think that the people needs the curb of religion in order to be controlled. I assure you these are not my sentiments. On the contrary, a society could not exist without laws but it could certainly exist without religion.
This is confirmed by the experiences of the savages discovered in the Maldives Islands who had not a metaphysical idea in their heads. It is proved still more by the government of China, where Deism is the religion of all the leading men of the state. ‘
TONY LENTIN
Of all the European monarchs of the late eighteenth century Frederick was undoubtedly the most enlightened. He was a powerful ally of Philosophs and one of the few rulers who put their thoughts into action.
End transcript: Frederick the Great and enlightened absolutism
Copy this transcript to the clipboard
Print this transcript
Frederick the Great and enlightened absolutism
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

The philosophes and enlightened opinion generally believed that the Encyclopédie was proving its worth and that Enlightenment ideas were slowly but surely gaining ground among the educated across Europe. Voltaire himself, no starry-eyed optimist, thought so. His Candide (1759) is a mercilessly witty attack on facile optimism in the face of every kind of disaster: war, earthquakes and man's inhumanity to man. Nevertheless he wrote to a friend in 1764:

Everything I observe is sowing the seeds of a revolution that will inevitably come to pass, which I shall not have the pleasure of witnessing … By degrees enlightenment has spread so widely that it will burst forth at the first opportunity, and then there will be a grand commotion. The younger generation are lucky: they will see some great things.

(Bruun, 1967, p. 102)

A207_1

Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has 50 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to university level study, find out more about the types of qualifications we offer, including our entry level Access courses and Certificates.

Not ready for University study then browse over 900 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus