Skip to content
Skip to main content

About this free course

Download this course

Share this free course

Working in diverse teams
Working in diverse teams

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

1 Assessing for teamwork skills

You started this course in Week 1 thinking about why employers are interested in recruiting people who have good teamwork skills and who can demonstrate the competencies they are looking for in a team player. Hopefully, by this point in the course, you feel more confident in your understanding of why it is advantageous for a business to have good team players. You should also be able to foresee some of the difficulties that may arise if an applicant is not able to develop these competencies.

Recruiting new staff is expensive for any organisation. Advertising the vacancy costs money and the interviews consume time. Recruiting the wrong person can do great harm, both to business performance and team morale. When the mistake is realised, the employee may leave, fail probation or be dismissed. The entire cycle of advertisement and interview then has to be repeated, with all the attendant costs and risks. It would be so much better for everybody to get it right first time.

Now listen to Rebecca Fielding from Gradconsult talking about how employers spot a good team player during the recruitment process.

Download this video clip.Video player: wdt_video_week8_section1_fielding.mp4
Copy this transcript to the clipboard
Print this transcript
Show transcript|Hide transcript
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Activity 1 The employer’s tale

Timing: Allow about 10 minutes

Have a look at Figure 1 and consider how an employer might test for some of the skills and competencies in an interview. Ask yourself:

  1. Which competencies would an employer be able to assess confidently from a traditional application and interview process?
  2. Which competencies if any would be more difficult to assess in these traditional recruitment methods and why?
  3. What kind of activity could be included to assess the more difficult competencies in the recruitment process?

Make sure you save your notes for this activity (either in the box below, your workbook in the interactive toolkit or elsewhere), as you will be asked to refer to them later.

Described image
Figure 1 Competencies and how they work
To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).


While most of the competencies illustrated in Figure 1 could be assessed using a traditional question and answer interview, it would be difficult to get a real sense of the following:

  • Fostering a supportive, informal group atmosphere and constructive use of humour
  • Listening to others and giving constructive feedback if needed
  • Creating enthusiasm and initiative to make things happen.

Did you come up with the same answers as here or were there other competencies in the diagram that you felt would be difficult to assess purely by question and answer in an interview scenario?

There is not necessarily a right or wrong answer here, and a good interviewer could ask a question that elicits this kind of feedback, but the issue is that without seeing these attributes in practice, it is difficult to tell whether someone has them or not.

Using a combination of group activity and competency-based interview questions can increase the accuracy of the recruitment process, which as you have seen is important for company performance and economy.