Skip to main content
Skip to content

About this free course

Download this course

Share this free course

Theories in technology evaluation
Theories in technology evaluation

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

1.2.3 Mixed and multiple methods

Some academics continue to argue that the different ontological positions that underlie the quantitative and qualitative paradigms are inherently incompatible. However, there are many scholars and practitioners of evaluation, and of social research in general, who reject this view (e.g. Burns, 2000; Ackroyd, 2004; Chen, 2005 and Bamberger et al., 2006). Silverman goes so far as to describe ‘such dichotomies and polarities’ as ‘highly dangerous’ (2000, p. 11). These authors, and many more nowadays, promote the use of a contingency approach, which employs mixed methods for data collection that are determined by the nature of the entity or activity to be investigated, rather than by the methodological prejudices of the evaluators (Clarke, 1999).