Uncaptioned interactive content

Transcript

ANDY LANE
Many real-world situations can be experienced differently as either a difficulty or a mess, depending on the viewpoint of the observer. However, I could not call it a system unless I had tried to make sense of it using systems thinking and found or formulated a system of interest within it. This means I would need a purpose for engaging with the real-world situation. When I do not have such a purpose in mind, I'm using the word "system" in its everyday sense rather than its technical systems practice sense.
The act of making a distinction is quite basic to what it is to be human. When we make a distinction, we split the world into two parts-- this and that. We separate the thing from its context or a system from its environment. This is the same as drawing a circle on a sheet of paper. When the circle is closed, three different elements are brought forth at the same time-- an inside, an outside, and a boundary.
The fundamental choice that faces systems practitioners is choosing to see systems either as something that exists, that can be discovered, measured, and possibly modelled, manipulated, or maintained, as does the first system practitioner in this cartoon, who jumps to the conclusion that this is clearly a manufacturing system; or as something we construct, design, or experience because of the distinctions or theories we embody, as does the second systems practitioner, who is open to the complexity of the situation-- the factory, river, dairying-- and sees systems as mental constructs formulated as part of a systemic inquiry. You will now learn how to define and identify systems of interest for yourself.

Back to - Uncaptioned interactive content