Skip to content
Skip to main content

About this free course

Become an OU student

Download this course

Share this free course

Metals in medicine
Metals in medicine

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

Paramagnetism of lanthanide complexes

When considering the lanthanides in the context of MRI contrast agents, the magnetic properties of their complex ions are important.

There are two possible contributions to the paramagnetism of a transition-metal complex. One arises from the spin of the unpaired electrons.

  • From what does the other contribution arise?

  • The orbital angular momentum of the unpaired electrons.

You know that for transition metal complexes, the d orbitals are strongly split by the crystal field.

This splitting can quench the orbital angular momentum meaning that for first-row transition metal complexes, the paramagnetism arises almost entirely from the spin of the unpaired electrons.

The magnetic moment is close to the ‘spin-only’ value and Equation 1 can be used to determine its magnitude.

equation left hand side mu sub cap s equals right hand side Square root of n times open n plus two close mu sub cap b
Equation label: (Equation 1)

Recall that μS is the spin-only magnetic moment, n is the number of unpaired electrons, and μB is the Bohr magneton.

But for lanthanide complexes this isn’t the case – take a look at Table 3.

Table 3  Magnetic moments of the tripositive aqueous ions of the lanthanides and lutetium.
Ion Electronic configuration μB
La3+ 4f0 diamagnetic
Ce3+ 4f1 2.51
Pr3+ 4f2 3.53
Nd3+ 4f3 3.55
Pm3+ 4f4 2.68
Sm3+ 4f5 1.46
Eu3+ 4f6 3.37
Gd3+ 4f7 8.00
Tb3+ 4f8 9.33
Dy3+ 4f9 10.55
Ho3+ 4f10 10.40
Er3+ 4f11 9.50
Tm3+ 4f12 7.35
Yb3+ 4f13 4.30
Lu3+ 4f14 diamagnetic

The magnetic moments are plotted in Figure 12, along with the spin-only values calculated from Equation 1.

Figure 12  Experimental and calculated magnetic moments for cap l times n super three postfix plus ions.

The clear failure of the spin-only formula shows that the orbital angular momentum is not quenched in the way that it is in first-row transition-metal complexes.

  • What does this suggest about the splitting of the 4f orbitals in lanthanide compounds?

  • It must be small (backing up what you saw in the previous section), and not sufficient to quench the orbital angular momentum

This, in turn, suggests that the exposure of the 4f orbitals to the ligands is small, and is further evidence that the 4f electrons are close to being part of the noble-gas core.

The magnetic moments in Table 3 are very similar to those in other lanthanide compounds, and are characteristic of the four times f super n configurations set alongside them. They can therefore be used to identify the configuration concerned.

Note that any 4f configuration is associated with just one high-spin magnetic moment.

  • How does this differ from complexes of the d-block metals?

  • Certain d-electron configurations occur in both high- and low-spin states.

  • Why is this further evidence that crystal-field effects are small in lanthanide compounds?

  • Low-spin complexes would require a large crystal-field splitting in the 4f orbital energy levels.

You will now be looking in detail at MRI contrast agents and, as you’ll see, the magnetic properties of the lanthanide ion cap g times d super three postfix plus play a key role.