Changing cities
Changing cities

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

Free course

Changing cities

5.1 Urbanism as a way of life

Described image
Figure 11 Mapping cultural difference in Chicago: social scientists associated with the Chicago School pioneered innovative styles of research into ethnic, race and class division in the city at the turn of the twentieth century. This map shows the distribution of people of different national origins in one small area of Chicago

There is a long-standing tradition of thought, most famously associated with the Chicago School of urban sociology that emerged in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, in which urban spaces are presented as the locations for the emergence of novel forms of social interaction and personal identity. Succinctly captured in Louis Wirth’s formulation of ‘urbanism as a way of life’, the Chicago School provided a theoretical framework for a much broader cultural narrative in which the modern industrial city was understood as a place where old deferential, traditional forms of organic community life were broken down and replaced by much more individualised, anonymous, mechanical and impersonal forms of collective interaction (Abbott, 1999; Smith, 1995).

As with other traditions of urban theory, this definition of the city is a particular problematisation, emerging from the specific contexts of Chicago at that time. It is an understanding that is closely related to the experimental styles of academic engagement that members of the Chicago School were themselves involved in at the time amongst poor and marginalised immigrant communities in the city.

There is a strong emphasis in the Chicago School’s account of urban culture on the ways in which spatial patterns of interaction, heterogeneity, intensity and mobility shape identities, experience and expression. This is a long-standing feature of spatial theory, in which the problem of thinking about the relationship between spatial pattern and spatial form on the one hand, and social and cultural relations on the other, is a perpetual, unavoidable issue. It is a strand reflected in the work of some of the most famous proponents of normative urban thought, including the pioneer of urban sociology, Charles Booth, father figures of urban planning such as Ebenezer Howard and Raymond Unwin, and critics of planning such as Jane Jacobs and Richard Sennett.

One shared feature of this canon of urban cultural theory is a sense that life in the modern city is always on the cusp of anomie, breakdown, isolation, bewilderment or alienation.


Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has 50 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications. You could either choose to start with an Access module, or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification. Read our guide on Where to take your learning next for more information.

Not ready for formal University study? Then browse over 1000 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus371