Discovering disorder: young people and delinquency
◄Previous: 4.2 The sociological approach

# 5 Conclusion

In this course, you studied the issue of juvenile delinquency and how this youthful misbehaviour can be studied. The authors focused on two main approaches, each of which starts with a different question: one approach tries to identify the causes of delinquency to answer the question of what makes some individuals but not others behave badly; the other approach changes the question to focus on why and how some behaviours but not others become defined as delinquent. Answer the following questions in Activity 12 to develop your understanding of different aspects of this course.

## Activity 12

Suggested time allocation: about 40 minutes

1. Juvenile delinquency is a complex term. Select all those aspects you think it might include:

Behaviour that breaks the current laws of the country
Status offences such as underage drinking or truanting from school
Behaviour that breaks social norms or expectations

## Discussion

Juvenile delinquency can include all of those aspects listed above. It is a complex term: it is not static but can change over time in response to changing expectations of what is acceptable. Who gets to define what counts as delinquency is also important to consider.

2. The course discussed the work of the psychologist Hans Eysenck who was one of the first researchers to develop a theory linking personality to deviant or criminal behaviour. Select all the claims which you think form part of his theory.

There are three personality dimensions: extroversion, neuroticism and psychoticism.
Personality has a biological basis.
Criminals score at the higher end of each of Eysencks’s scales in comparison to non-offenders.
Certain risk factors, such as family background or low intelligence, can be identified which are associated with the potential for criminal or deviant behaviour.
The link between personality and deviant or criminal behaviour was due to differences in learning during childhood.

3. Which of the following concepts did each of the authors below use in their theories?

Moral panics

Stanley Cohen

Labelling

Howard Becker

## Discussion

Cohen used the concept ‘moral panic’ to show how certain behaviours or groups of people become defined as a threat to society by the mass media and figures of authority such as judges, police offices and politicians. A moral panic is a press campaign, driven by the media and authority figures, which labels negatively a section of society.

Howard Becker used the concept of labelling to show that:

- The only difference between a ‘normal’ group and a ‘deviant’ group was that the latter had been ‘labelled’ as deviant/criminal. This meant that some in the normal group might have done exactly the same things but had simply not been labelled as deviant while some in the deviant group might have been wrongly labelled.
- Some people and some behaviours are identified as criminal or deviant because social groups label them as such.
- When labelled in particular ways, individuals can start to live up to the label and being labelled can affect how others treat such individuals

4. Stanley Cohen also used the term ‘folk devils’ to describe the ways in which groups of young people were demonised. Can you think of any examples of current ‘folk devils’ that might fit Cohen’s theory?

(A text entry box would appear here, but your browser does not support it.)

## Discussion

Labels such as ‘yobs’, ‘neds’, ‘chavs’, ‘ladettes’ and ‘scroungers’ are all used to demonise generally young and male people in society, although ‘ladettes’ refers, of course, to young women, and ‘scroungers’ is a term which has been used more generally to refer negatively to individuals who claim some kind of state benefit.

You may well have come up with different terms – labels like the ones above can change frequently and can differ between regions and different age groups too – but the important point about these terms is that they portray the people concerned as distinct evil beings rather than as human beings who live in the real social world and do things for reasons.

5. Stuart Hall and colleagues extended Cohen’s work and identified the ‘mugger’ as the new folk devil in the 1970s. Drop the phrases below into the correct boxes below to show how Stuart Hall et al. described the steps towards the creation of a ‘law and order society’.

Mass media and figures of authority create a moral panic

1.

Mugger becomes defined as folk devil

2.

Creation of a moral panic requires that society needs protection through tougher policing

3

Mugging deflects attention away from real political and social tensions

4.

## Discussion

The above description is a simplification of the processes by which a ‘law and order’ society is created. Stuart Hall et al. argued that the mass media, with the help of authority figures such as politicians, judges and the police, create a moral panic by labelling certain individuals as ‘muggers’ who then became the new folk devil of the 1970s. As social and political anxiety grew, this allowed politicians to step in to argue that society needed to be protected from the ‘mugger’ through tougher policing and a generally stronger state. In so doing, mugging deflected attention away from genuine social and political tensions and led to the creation of a ‘law and order’ society.

◄Contents►Next: Keep on learning

OpenLearn - Discovering disorder: young people and delinquency
Except for third party materials and otherwise, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence, full copyright detail can be found in the acknowledgements section. Please see full copyright statement for details.