◄Previous: 1 Rationale for expert evidence

# 2 Admissibility of expert evidence

There are a number of rules, primarily common law, that prescribe when expert evidence will be admissible. Some of these rules apply to all evidence, but others are specific to expert evidence. For example, the concept of evidential 'weight' means how much influence the evidence will have on the fact-finder's decision. This applies both evidence from lay witnesses and expert witnesses, though often expert evidence will tend to carry more weight overall.

In the following sections, you will be introduced to some of the key admissibility rules concerning expert evidence, namely relevance, assistance, reliability, expertise and hearsay.

◄Contents►Next: 2.1 Relevance

- 1 R v Bonython [1984] 38 SASR 45 (South Australia).
- 2 R v Turner [1975] QB 834.
- 3 Honeysett v The Queen [2014] 311 ALR 320.
- 4 R v Miller [2010] EWCA Crim 1578.
- 5 Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir 1995).
- 6 Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 43 F.3d 1311, 584–587 (9th Cir 1995).
- 7 R v Dallagher[2002] EWCA Crim 1903.
- 8 R v Dallagher[2002] EWCA Crim 1903.
- 9 R (Doughty) v Ely Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 522 (Admin).
- 10 R (Doughty) v Ely Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 522 (Admin) [24].
- 11 R v Silverlock [1894] 2 QB 766.
- 12 R v Abadom [1983] 1 WLR 126.

OpenLearn - Expert evidence and forensic science in the courtroom
Except for third party materials and otherwise, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence, full copyright detail can be found in the acknowledgements section. Please see full copyright statement for details.