5 Adopting a critical stance
In the previous section, you were encouraged to take a critical look at the concept of international development and to examine the ideas, assumptions and values that influence the actions and policies of those who undertake development.
Taking a critical stance is a requirement of academic study and research. It is an ability that is learnt and developed through practice. When thinking critically, you question, analyse, and challenge what you are reading and what you are being told. Does an argument have sufficient evidence? If so, of what kind? Is the conclusion consistent and reasoned?
A further key element of taking a critical stance is thinking reflexively. This involves being prepared to subject your own judgements to critical examination. It is important to recognise the role your own personal background and biases might play in your critical thinking. It is all too easy to interpret other people’s views in such a way that they reflect your own understanding and viewpoint. You seek confirmation of your thinking and may ignore contradictory interpretations. It is equally easy to prejudge what someone is saying and devalue or dismiss it because it does not make sense to you on your terms.
Now put on your critical hat and try out the below activity.
Activity 3: Being critical with data and statistics
Data takes many forms – numbers, words, measurements, observations. The collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation and presentation of data is crucial to social science research and to informing development practice. Data informs us of the number of people living in a city, the level of poverty in a country or the attitudes of a community towards a proposed new factory.
Statistics is that branch of mathematics that deals with numerical data. Raw numbers are converted into meaningful descriptions such as the percentage of children in a school who pass examinations, or the rate of increase of influenza infections in a city over the winter months. Statistics is also used to make inferences based on sampling a part of the population such as the overall literacy levels in a country.
The problem with statistics comes when they are accepted uncritically and seen as neutral and objective ‘facts’. Statistics are produced through processes of definition, evaluation and interpretation and so are never neutral. They are often interpreted inappropriately. For instance, a correlation between two sets of data identifies a possible relationship between them but does not prove causation (Sage Research Methods, 2017). Statistical analysis may show a correlation between a high cholesterol diet and heart disease but does not prove that one causes the other. Doing so needs further research.
The following activity asks you to select a statistic from a choice of three for each question. Note which figure you choose and whether the correct answer comes as a surprise or not. What do you think influenced your choice?
Gapminder created a quiz aimed at debunking our assumptions about the state of the world under the conditions of global development. Gapminder tested thousands of people to generate their own statistics on the extent to which people typically hold incorrect assumptions about this set of development issues. The statistics in the quiz below regarding how many people got each question wrong come from Gapminder’s findings (Gapminder, no date b).
1. How much of the world’s economy comes from agriculture, forestry and fishing?
2. What share of countries in the world have laws against sexual harassment at work?
3. What percentage of the world’s population lives in megacities (cities with at least ten-million people)?
4. How much of the excess heat from global warming is captured in the oceans?
5. What share of the world’s population don’t have enough food to meet their daily needs?
6. How many people in the world have access to safe drinking water in their home or close by?
7. Of all energy used in the world, how much comes from natural gas, coal and oil?
Discussion
What this quiz shows is that, when asked about statistics, many people make underestimates or overestimates. Choices may be influenced by media stories, the focus of social media exchanges, personal bias and assumptions. In some cases, such inaccuracy doesn’t matter. In other situations, it may lead to negative attitudes, fearfulness, or poor decision-making. Critical appraisal of statistical data is essential.
OpenLearn - Introducing global development Except for third party materials and otherwise, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence, full copyright detail can be found in the acknowledgements section. Please see full copyright statement for details.