The one certainty in the study of any area of law is that it will be characterised by change. There is a continuous conflict between the need to acknowledge pre-established laws and the need to facilitate change in view of changing social and economic conditions. The law must be both static and dynamic: it must change, yet at the same time continue on its old path.
If the law was ever changing, it could not fulfil its basic function, namely to answer to the need for certainty, predictability, order and safety. An ever-changing law would increase practical uncertainty, social instability and economic insecurity.
Allow about 10 minutes
Do you think the law should always change as an immediate response to changes in society? Or do you think that changes to the law should be gradual, taking into account previous laws and with a process of full consultation?
There is no one answer to this question. Your viewpoint will depend on your own views and experiences. Often, during debates about the law, there are few clear or obvious answers. One of the skills law students and lawyers develop is to create a persuasive argument using examples and information to lead their audience to the conclusion they wish to be drawn. This usually involves outlining the law, acknowledging strengths and weaknesses, considering other viewpoints, putting forward suggestions and creating a narrative. A narrative can be likened to a story with a beginning, middle and an end.
Law in Scotland can be changed in a number of ways:
OpenLearn - The Scottish Parliament and law making
Except for third party materials and otherwise, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence, full copyright detail can be found in the acknowledgements section. Please see full copyright statement for details.