In the BancoSol story, you can see institutional development taking place at a number of levels. It is useful to distinguish between these levels, though it must be recognised that what is happening at one level is never in real life separate from what is happening at the others.
One conventional way of describing these different levels is to identify ‘macro’, ‘meso’ and ‘micro’ levels. I must immediately say that these terms can mean different things in different contexts. But I can suggest what might be a helpful way of understanding them by looking through the two lenses I identified for looking at institutional development: institutional development as history; and institutional development as intervention. Through these lenses:
Macro level:
Meso level:
Micro level:
Table 1 shows what this might look like in the BancoSol story:
Level | Institutional development as history | Institutional development as intervention |
Macro | BancoSol as part of broader structural change, as illustrated in quote from Rutherford | The creation of BancoSol contributes to the institutionalisation of micro-finance for commerce in Bolivia and more widely in Latin America |
Meso | NGOs and other civil society agencies become more significant, stronger network emerges | BancoSol builds – or attempts to build – relationships with other agencies and organisations |
Micro | Impact of recession and structural adjustment in towns: the unemployed and small traders seeking micro-capital | BancoSol deliberately builds its operations around the value of treating poor people with respect |
OpenLearn - Seeing institutions in different ways Except for third party materials and otherwise, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence, full copyright detail can be found in the acknowledgements section. Please see full copyright statement for details.