Despite differences, 'anti-gender' mobilisations draw on shared affective frames: innocence (children), purity (nation), nature (‘sex,’ family), divine order, and common sense (neutrality).
One of the most striking findings of the RESIST and other research is how some actors weaponise feminist vocabulary:
As Ahmed (2021) notes, anti-trans feminism extends the reach of the right by giving moral credibility to exclusionary agendas.
How this works:
In doing so, it allows anti-gender politics to penetrate liberal spaces under the guise of protectionism and ‘common sense.’ Structural foundations 'anti-gender' discourse draws power from wider structural forces. Understanding these helps you recognise how anti-gender discourse draws legitimacy from broader crises.

'Anti-gender' discourse draws power from wider structural forces. Understanding these helps you recognise how anti-gender discourse draws legitimacy from broader crises.
|
Structural factor |
Manifestation |
|
Nationalism & sovereignty |
framing gender equality as foreign interference |
|
Colonial legacies & racism |
narratives of laïcité policing Muslim communities, that is, the use of secularism as a framework to regulate, restrict, or discipline the public expression of Muslim religious, cultural, and gendered practices. |
|
Post-socialist transitions |
suspicion of ‘Western’ agendas in CEE states |
|
Demography & migration |
linking family values to anti-migrant policy |
|
Neoliberal austerity |
using moral panic to distract from economic decline |
These structures shape why certain actors and narratives gain momentum.

The impacts documented by RESIST include systematic attacks on:
Reproductive rights – abortion and contraception restricted under ‘pro-life’ or ‘demographic crisis’ frames.
Trans rights and healthcare – especially targeting minors and gender-affirming care, justified as child protection.
Feminist and queer knowledge – gender studies and intersectional theory dismissed as ideology; universities defunded or censored.
Academic freedom – scholars face harassment, legal threats, and funding cuts.
Inclusive education – school curricula including reliable information about sexual and gender diversity are reframed as indoctrination.
LGBTIQ+ organisations and spaces – community centres and reproductive health services attacked as threats to morality.