Part 2 - Core Stages in the Journey
2. Communication Processes
Varying Communication across Europe
Communication is part of the process
One of the clearest findings from Clarus is that communication is central to the handling of digital evidence. It is not an extra layer added on afterwards. It is part of the process at every stage.
Formal communication
Some communication is formal. This includes:
- official requests for analysis
- written reports
- evidence forms
- entries in secure systems
These forms of communication are valued because they are traceable, standardised, and can be reviewed later. Formal communication is especially important when precision is required, when legal accountability is involved, or when findings need to be preserved for later challenge or scrutiny.
Across the partner countries, the general process often flows from the investigator, who outlines:
- the case context
- the device or evidence in question
- the legal basis for seizure or search
- the questions that need to be answered
The analyst then carries out the work and reports back in a formal format.
Informal communication
But formal communication does not tell the whole story. Clarus also found that informal communication is a necessary and routine part of investigative and forensic work.
Informal communication includes:
- phone calls
- quick conversations
- face-to-face clarification
- messages between colleagues
- preparatory discussions before official documents are submitted
It often helps practitioners solve problems, clarify uncertainty, agree on how to frame a request, or explain what a result can and cannot mean.
In this sense, informal communication can improve coordination and reduce mistakes. It can also make the system more flexible and more realistic.
Move to the next page by clicking the arrow on the top right to move to the next page in this section.