|Course:||Assets Based Working with Communities|
|Book:||Scotland UWS COER - Identity and Inter-professional Working|
|Printed by:||Guest user|
|Date:||Thursday, 27 Jun 2019, 08:37|
You will be presented with a mini-case consisting of textual extracts from audio interviews and video clips which you will analyse to address a set of critical questions about the content of the mini-case.
First you will watch a video of a staff development workshop conducted at Centrestage in Scotland. Centrestage is a social enterprise that is firmly based on an assets based approach in all that they do. This approach is used with various different client groups and also with their approach to staff development. The video is of a staff development session where the staff are exploring issues of identity and how they impact on their professional practice.
You will be asked to consider the issues raised in the video in relation to your own professional practice.
You will then be able to read about how other community practitioners implement assets based approaches in other contexts. In addition, you will be able to read how others think about identity and how it relates to their professional practice.
Further information about the Scottish case study can be found by clicking on the hyperlink which will download a PDF version of the Scottish case Study Report.
Click the link to download the pdf
The artefact that you are going to consider was generated as part of a research and development project investigating the use of assets based approaches to community participation 'Assets Com'. The artefact in this section is a video produced by a senior member of staff at Centrestage as a result of participating in the project and as a means to develop training materials and approaches for the staff who work at Centrestage.
Eoghann, the senior member of staff running this session is an artist. He uses art to work with the young people who come to Centrestage as a way of building their confidence and enabling them to express themselves creatively. Young people who attend Eoghann’s class are presented with a catalogue of art in the styles of Symbolism and graffiti created by famous artists from all over the world (i.e., Banksy, 2018; Basquiat, 1988; Picaso, 1973). Once the young people had been introduced to the artists' work and browsed through the catalogue, they were set a challenge to produce meaningful works of their own using art. For the young people, this meant using art to depict the different identities each of them has with respect to their: personal identity, family identity, and community identity and the assets or strengths that each identity contains. The work with the young people was successful in that it engaged the young people in a process of positive self discovery and self expression through the medium of visual art. This process could be equated with the first stage of a motivational interview where the practitioner facilitates a self discovery process, establishes empathy and builds rapport and trust. Project researchers asked Eoghann to adapt the workshop he did with young people for staff development purposes by inviting his staff to carry out a similar exercise.
Centrestage professional development workshop
Please watch this video and think about your responses to the critical questions on page 5.
Empowerment and Self-regulating Efficacy
The Reflective Practitioner: Professional knowledge
Read the following literature review and answer the critical questions in Section 5.
This section will provide information on theories and approaches that are important for this COER. We will begin by presenting information about ‘Reflective Thinking’ (Dewey, 1933) an approach that is useful for activities such as introspection. We will also describe how an assets based organisation, Centrestage, have used introspection in the process of staff development.
Reflective thinking and introspection have also been extended to be used in ‘reflective practice’ (Schön, 2011) and can be used in approaches of ‘reflective writing’ to record and capture ‘learning incidents’. Critically reflecting on learning incidents enables practitioners to gain insights to situations where they might attempt to do something differently the next time a similar situation occurs, or repeat a course of action which proved to be successful in a previous attempt (Brown, 2006; Ghaye and Lillyman, 2006; 2010; Gibbs, 1988; Mezirow, 1991; Mezirow and Taylor, 2009; Parrott and Schulkin, 1993).
We will also present information about other assets based approaches used to empower young people and as part of a staff development strategy by exploring aspects of identity through art as an assets based approach A-B-A. We will then present information about other assets based approaches used by Centrestage to enhance both the progress of the young people they work with and as part of their professional development strategy – which involves exploring peoples strengths and talents; using Motivational Interviewing (Miller and Rollnick, 1995); and the theory of empowerment (Bandura, 1977; 1986; 1997) used to enhance peoples self-regulated efficacy and self-esteem to give them confidence to make changes in their lives. Finally, we will consider ways in which the concept of becoming a reflective practitioner can help professionals exchange ideas and practices in order to become inter-professional through shared experience.
We believe reflective thinking is an important part of how practitioners learn and is also a useful tool for both personal and professional develop. Think of ways you could use the process of reflection to improve aspects of your daily practices at work through introspection by either: having a written internal dialogue with yourself and reflecting periodically about your thoughts and experiences, or by capturing your feelings and thoughts on paper by using rich pictures or art as a form of empowerment through self-expression. Do you think keeping a reflective log or diary or capturing your thoughts and feelings in a picture would be useful ways to help practitioners realise their assets based strengths?
Reflection is an analytical form of thought and a process which involves the examination of facts, which conclusions are drawn from, based on reflective thought and evidence which supports it. It is important to recognise that knowledge and skills potentially can be recontextualised from one experience and applied to other situations, but this is dependent on whether there are enough common aspects from both experiences to enable recontextualisation and new knowledge generation and the application of acquired knowledge from one situation to another. This process of reflective thinking deals with subject matter which often presents obstacles, problems and confusion, while other parts of the subject matter present solutions and provide insights and intellectual stimulation. Reflection then, as a process, is about identifying relations by searching until a relation is established as accurately as the conditions allow for it to be defined (Dewey, 1933, pp. 47, 67, 72, 77).
There are six important states of thinking which contribute to reflective activity they are: (1) ‘suggestions’, which can lead to potential solutions; (2) ‘intellectualisation’, of the difficulties which have been directly experienced into a ‘problem’ to be solved; (3) ‘hypothesis’, employing suggestions to direct observation for the purposes of collecting factual material; (4) ‘reasoning’, the mental expansion of the idea in which reasoning is a part of the inference being made; (5) ‘testing’, the hypothesis by employing some form of action; and (6) ‘prediction’, looking into the future by making forecasts (Dewey, 1933, pp. 107, 117).
Empowerment and Self-regulating Efficacy
It could be argued that processes of reflective thinking and activity are important prerequisites to processes of empowerment and to improved efficacy! Empowerment is the process of becoming more confident and especially when a person or group of people begin to take control of their lives through exercising a degree of autonomy and self-determination in a responsible way (Rappaport, 1981; Rappaport and Seidman, 2006). A person’s confidence can be increased through ‘self-regulating efficacy’ which is the belief in one’s own capabilities to organise and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations (Bandura, 1977; 1997). Self-efficacy is the belief in yourself to take the appropriate action in a given situation and has been used successfully as an analytical tool in social work, education, psychology and health work.
Bandura (1986) defined self-efficacy as being a humans own judgment or assessment of being capable of performing a particular task or activity. Bandura distinguished self-efficacy belief as being unlike self-esteem in that self-esteem reflects how humans feel about their own self-worth or value. Moreover, that self-efficacy is a reflection of how confident humans are about performing specific tasks such as being able to solve a complex maths problem. This means that humans can hold high self-efficacy belief about being able to perform an activity in one area but hold low self-efficacy belief about being able to perform an activity in a different area. An example of having high and low self-efficacy would be high self-efficacy belief in one’s own ability to solve complex maths problems, which may not coincide with holding a high self-efficacy belief about being able to perform a piece of complex music to a similar high standard as solving a complex maths problem. This is because self-efficacy is specific to the activity being undertaken. Self-efficacy has been used as an effective performance-based measure of a learner’s perceived capability, motivation and capacity to undertake tasks (Bandura, 1977, p. 191).
Think of ways that you might empower someone to achieve a goal or to complete a task which they thought they were not capable of doing. There is an example on page 3 'The artefact' where the Centrestage practitioner uses art styles of graffiti and symbolism to work with the young people and encourage them to produce their own work.
Motivational interviewing has been used in counselling as a method to engage disempowered individuals by increasing intrinsic motivation within a person(s) to change their behaviour. Within the area of social psychology and social counselling ‘motivational interviewing’ makes use of exploring a person’s ambivalence which has been reported to be an important factor in assisting the process of change (Miller and Rollnick, 1995).
The basic five principles of motivational interviewing, principles that focus on empowering people, that make this approach different from more traditional (deficit based) approaches are it supports an asset based approach to working with people, in that it allows practitioners to:
(1) Express and Show Empathy Toward Clients: practitioners express and demonstrate empathy when discussing behaviours, thoughts, attitudes and life events that clients regularly engage in. By expressing empathy, build rapport and trust.
(2) Support and Develop Discrepancy: in the interview process clients give reasons for changing their behaviour – instead of viewing counsellors as authority figures with the right answers. For example, clients might decide to stop drinking alcohol to build healthy relationships with their children. If clients are exhibiting behaviours and making choices that take them away from their goals, counsellors gradually point out this gap between behaviours and goals to clients.
(3) Deal with Resistance: when clients resist changing their behaviour, counsellors do not confront the client’s resistance. Instead, the counsellors avoid struggling to get client’s to see their point of view. As discussions continue, counsellors work with their clients to get them to see and examine different viewpoints, allowing their clients to choose which points of view they want to stick with. Resistance, when it occurs, is a sign for counsellors to alter their approach to the talk therapy.
(4) Support Self-Efficacy: Clients are made to feel that they are capable of achieving the change they want. This principle involves counsellors discussing and pointing out previous behavioural and life successes clients have experienced. For example, counsellors may remind clients recovering from drug addiction that they have kept a job for two years and have been drug-free for six months. Current or previous strengths and skills clients possess are also discussed, thereby increasing the clients’ belief that they can change.
(5) Developing Autonomy: Counsellors demonstrate to their clients that the authentic power for them to change comes from within, not from the counsellor. This emphasises the thought that there is no one way to achieve the change that clients want. It is also expressed to clients that they are ultimately responsible for changing their behaviour. Additionally, counsellors listen as clients develop a list of action steps they can take to change their behaviour (Miller and Rollnick, 2002).
Think of ways in which a manager or trainer might use motivational interviewing with a team of practitioners as part of a focus group or staff professional development workshop to initiate change or with community groups to work through issues.
The Reflective Practitioner: Professional knowledge
Schön (2011) stated that there are two main elements for specialisation within a given profession. They are: (1) the substantial quantity of knowledge within a particular field which a specialist affirms they can command; and (2) mastery over techniques of production and application of knowledge to solve problems. This ‘application’ of knowledge has been linked to ‘professional knowledge’ and is viewed as a higher hierarchy of ‘general principles’ which are set at the highest level with ‘concrete problem solving’ being set at the lowest. Professional knowledge consists of two parts: (1) an underpinning science component which informs the practices which it is based upon; and (2) a skills and technique component which determines the level of proficiency of the performance which utilises the underpinning theory and applied knowledge (pp. 22-24).
One of the traits of being a professional is developing the ability to take a varied base of knowledge and turn it into a professional service which has been adapted to meet the needs of a client: a process which Schön termed ‘divergent thinking skills’ (Schön, 2011, pp. 45-46). Reflection-in-action is a concept described by Schön as a spontaneous and instinctive performance of human actions carried out in day-to-day practice. Describing this form of knowledge can be difficult because the knowledge is ‘tacit’. It is tied to our choice of action and feelings about and towards the things we are working with. Moreover, the performance of a professional is dependent on the concept of tacit knowing-in-action. Knowing-in-action has been described as the idea that a kind of knowing is inherent in intelligent action (Schön, 2011, pp. 49, 50).
Schön argued that phrases such as: “‘thinking on your feet’, ‘keeping your wits about you’, and ‘learning by doing’” all indicate that humans are not just capable of thinking about doing but have the capacity to think about doing something whilst doing it: a process he called ‘reflection-in-action’ (Schön, 2011, p. 54). Reflection-in-action is reliant on experience of the unexpected. This means that when results of an action are based on intuitiveness and spontaneous performance and the outcome is what was expected we tend not to think any further about it. However, if the performance results in an unexpected outcome this may prompt a response involving a process of reflecting-in-action. This process involves a focus on the results of an action, on what was involved in the action and on the tacit knowledge associated with and in the action (Schön, 2011, p. 56). Reflections of practitioners can be employed to generate new understandings about situations of ambiguity and distinctiveness which they have experienced, reflecting on projects they have undertaken and on situations they have lived through (Schön, 2011, p. 61). Furthermore, they may reflect on their practice whilst in the middle of it. Schön (2011, p, 62) describe this process as: “the art through which practitioners sometimes cope with the troublesome ‘divergent’ situations of practice” (Schön, 2011, p. 62).
Critical Reflection and Dialogue
Critical reflection has been defined as asking questions about the validity and reliability of suppositions held deeply by humans based upon their previous experiences. It is often portrayed as something which occurs after an awareness of conflict has emerged with respect to an individual’s thoughts, feelings, and actions which can cause perspective transformation (Mezirow and Taylor, 2009, p. 6). An important element of reflection is engagement in dialogue with the self and with others. Mezirow (Mezirow, 1991, p. 77) identified dialogue as being an essential medium through which transformation occurs and develops. They explain that it differs from everyday discussion because it is most often found in transformative learning when there is reason to call into question the clarity, trustworthiness, accuracy and authenticity of what is being argued or to question the integrity of the individual presenting the argument (Mezirow, 1991, p. 77).
Brown (2006, p. 732) found that individuals seldom change through a rational process of ‘analyse-think-change’, but instead are more prone to change in what he called a ‘see-feel-change sequence’. This involves ‘affective knowing’ which consists of developing an awareness of the importance of our feelings and emotions in the reflective process which is innate in critical reflection. Parrott and Schulkin (1993, p. 56) pointed out that physiological processes of cognition and emotion are linked through an interdependent relationship. Furthermore, emotions are inherently cognitive and are important for anticipating future needs, preparing for future actions, and preparing for thinking certain types of thoughts, ideas and strategies.
The iterative reflective model has been used in reflective practice for healthcare professionals to reflect upon their everyday practices. This model is based on the idea that the reflective process is more effectively understood and followed as a ‘Cycle’. It can provide a deeper understanding of experience and a fuller grasp of knowledge and skills from working around the model in a continuous ‘clockwise’ cycle. Gibbs (1988) provides a cyclical model shown in Figure 7 which contains six steps or phase points, with each step on the cycle being associated with a key reflective question (Ghaye and Lillyman, 2006, p. 23).
The Reflective Cycle
With usage, the iterative model can provide signposts for individuals to map progress or to work on emerging issues and problems. The iterative reflective cycle model is a work-in-progress form of model where the user decides when to cease repeating the cycle when they are satisfied with the outcome of their reflections. According to Ghaye and Lillyman, (2006) the ‘action plan’ step has the potential to generate: “new actions, encounters and situations that can be understood by asking the question ‘what happened?’” (p. 24). Ghaye and Lillyman (2010) reported that using reflection can empower individuals and summarised seven aspects of reflective empowerment with regards to nursing practice. They are: (1) reflection is fundamental to experiential learning and development of practical knowledge; (2) reflection will help individuals to work towards better practice; (3) reflective practice has been identified as necessary for effective nursing; (4) reflective practice will bring about benefits; (5) all healthcare professionals can be reflective practitioners; (6) reflective practice models enhance professional status; and (7) reflective practice enhances each healthcare professional’s knowledge (Ghaye and Lillyman, 2010, p. 60).
The Reflective Cycle proposed by Gibbs (1998) could be used as a means to capture practitioner insights and knowledge could be exchanged between different disciplinary groups to promote interprofessionalism and to create a common language between different professions. As part of the activity in section seven you will be asked to contribute to a collaborative Wiki where you can use the reflective cycle to help you think about your answers. This reflective process should help you to put into practice many of the concepts and ideas discussed previously about asset based approaches A-B-As for the purposes of promoting interprofessionalism and to create a repository of shared experience with others.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychology Review. Vol. 84, pp. 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory: Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brown, K. (2006). Leadership and social justice and equity: Evaluating a transformative framework and andragogy. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 700-745.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we Think: A Restatement Of The Relation Of Reflective Thinking To The Educative Process, D.C. Health and Company, USA.
Ghaye, T., and Lillyman, S. (2006). Learning Journals and Critical Incidents: Reflective practice for health care professionals. Second Edition, Quay Books A division of MA Healthcare Ltd.
Ghaye, T., and Lillyman, S. (2010). Reflection: Principles and Practices for Healthcare Professionals. Quay Books A division of MA Healthcare Ltd.
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J., and Taylor, W. T. (2009). Transformative learning in Practice: insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
Miller, W. R., and Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behaviour (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R., and Rollnick, S. (1995). What is Motivational Interviewing? Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 325-334.
Parrott, W. G., and Schulkin, J. (1993). Neuropsychology and cognitive nature of the emotions. Cognition and Emotions. Vol. 7, pp. 43-59.
Rappaport, J. (1981). "In praise of paradox. A social policy of empowerment over prevention" (PDF). American Journal of Community Psychology. 9 (1): 1–25 (13). doi:10.1007/BF00896357 [Available at] https://grow.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/In-Praise-of-Paradox-A-Social-Policy-of-Empowerment-Over-Prevention-.pdf
Rappaport, J and Seidman, E., eds. (2006). Handbook of Community Psychology. ISBN 978-0618196043.
Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schön, D. A. (2011). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. (First published in 1983) Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Activity 1 - Critical Questions -
Answer the following critical questions and record your answers in your Individual wiki. Use the information you have read about the context, the information in the video and the discussion of the staff from Centrestage to help you think about and answer the following questions:
Click the link to complete your Individual Wiki
Drawing on your reflections in your Individual wiki please share how you might apply what you have learned from this case to your professional practice using the Group wiki to answer the following reflective questions:
Complete your Group Wiki
Comparing international perspectives from Practitioners and academics
Compare the answers you gave in your personal blog and the reflections recorded in the collaborative wiki, firstly to the answers given by the practitioners at Centrestage to the same critical and reflective questions. Secondly, compare your answers to other international perspectives provided below:
Practitioner answers to the professional development workshop
Please watch this video and think about your responses to the critical questions on page 5 and the practitioner’s answers in the video below. Alternatively, you can download a full transcript of the practitioner answers to the critical questions.
Click the link to download the pdf
Compare your Individual and Group Wiki answers to the practitioners answers
Click the link to complete your Group Wiki
In the previous sections, you will have learned about how identity relates to your personal, family and your community identity and how aspects of these different identities relate and inform your professional identity and your professional practice. You will have learned about an assets-based organisation in Scotland and ways that the practitioners have used different aspects of their identity when working with young people. You will have also learned about how different aspects of community youth workers' identity impacts on their practice in different European contexts. You will have developed your analytical thinking skills through the use of critical questions, reflective thinking and writing to reflect on your own identity and how that impacts upon your own practice. By completing this resource, you will have learned that self-identity is multifaceted and how different socio-cultural processes constantly shape identity and professional practice.
We would greatly appreciate it if you would take the time to complete the quick one-minute feedback questionnaire and our learner experience and satisfaction survey by clicking on the links below. Thank you.
You can find out more about how our course was developed and you can leave feedback, post comments and ask questions by visiting our website by clicking on the word patch wall link.
Brewer, M. B and Hewstone, M. (2004). Self and Social Identity: Perspectives on Social Psychology. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Publishing.
Goffman, G. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre. ISBN 978-0-14-013571-8. Anchor Books edition
Adams, R. (2008). Empowerment, participation and social work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Humphries, B. (1996). Critical Perspectives on Empowerment. Birmingham: Venture.
Rappaport, J., Carolyn F.S., and Hess, H. (1984). Studies in Empowerment: Steps toward Understanding and Action. New York: Haworth.
Bandura, A. (1982). “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency”. American Psychologist. 37 (2): 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change”. Psychological Review. 84 (2): 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191. PMID 847061.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-0-89862-566-0
Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1572305632.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational Interviewing, Helping People Change, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-60918-227-4.
The Reflective Practitioner:
Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice: writing and professional development (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. p. xix. ISBN 9781848602113. OCLC 458734364.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D. (1985). Reflection, turning experience into learning. London; New York: Kogan Page; Nichols. p. 19. ISBN 0893972029. OCLC 11030218.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 046506874X. OCLC 8709452.