Skip to main content

Unit 6: Learning and organisational culture

Site: OpenLearn Create
Course: Implementing Safeguarding in the International Aid Sector
Book: Unit 6: Learning and organisational culture
Printed by: Guest user
Date: Sunday, 19 May 2024, 1:04 PM

Introduction

A diagram depicting a centre circle with arrows pointing out to six outer circles. The centre circle says implementing safeguarding in the international aid sector. The first outer circle says week 1 introduction. The next circle says week 2 identify. Circle 3 says week 3 prevent. The next says week 4 report and respond. The fifth says week 5 improve accountability. The final circle says weeks 6 monitor and learn. All the outer circles are greyed out except for one which says week 6 monitor and learn.

Congratulations on getting to the final unit for this course – Unit 6! This unit focuses on monitoring and learning when implementing safeguarding in our organisations.

It provides an opportunity to reflect on what you already know through your study so far, as well as your experience of safeguarding from your practice.

The key themes of Unit 6 are:

  • Strengthening a safeguarding culture within organisations.
  • Strengthening report handling mechanisms.
  • The importance of good and regular supervision.
  • Embedding learning – from managing safeguarding concerns to preventing harm from occurring in the first place.

As you work through this unit, the narrative and the activities enable you to reflect on, update and further develop your knowledge and practice of safeguarding to protect people from all forms of harm. Implementing this knowledge to strengthen a safeguarding culture in your organisation also brings about greater accountability in the international aid sector.

These activities, together with the tools you have learnt to apply on this course, will help you to apply your learning and further understand roles and responsibilities across safeguarding in organisations working in the international aid sector.

To test your knowledge and understanding to date, take a moment to reflect on the following statements and record whether you think they are correct or incorrect.

Statement one. Everyone has a responsibility for safeguarding, particularly 
managers who have the added responsibility of building an environment that is safe by promoting the code of conduct. Statement two. Safeguarding means organisations have a duty of care (sometimes known as the “Duty to do No Harm”) to children and vulnerable adults who have contact with the organisation. This duty is also owed to staff and associated personnel, such as volunteers and partners. Statement three. All organisations must have safeguarding policies and procedures in place and ensure staff and associated personnel attend mandatory training. Statement four. When managing safeguarding concerns, decisions should be taken in the best interests of the survivor/victim. Statement five. Managers have a particular responsibility to promote the organisational code of conduct and to create a safe environment for concerns to be raised and discussed.

Well done if you noted that all the statements are correct. But how can you be sure that your organisation is taking steps to uphold these statements?

To do so we must monitor and learn to gauge how well we are implementing safeguarding in our organisations, and we need to develop a positive culture that supports safeguarding.

6.1 A positive safeguarding culture

An image of several hands coming together to form a heart shape, which is backlit by a bright light.
© Shuang Wang/Dreamstime.com

We also know that policies and procedures alone are not sufficient for safeguarding to succeed. Organisations should cultivate an organisational culture through effective strategy and leadership that will benefit safeguarding.

Culture can be difficult to articulate and analysing the culture of an organisation can be particularly challenging to do from within. ‘Organisational culture’ is often described as the personality of that organisation – ‘the way we do things around here’. It encompasses the underlying values, beliefs and codes of practice that make an organisation what it is. It can be seen through behaviour, language, customs, rules, group interaction and habits (Williams, 2018).

Monitoring and reviewing organisational culture is pivotal to effective safeguarding. The way organisations treat their staff and representatives reflects on how they treat their partners and those they seek to help.

Organisational culture is the basis for safeguarding in an organisation: the culture should provide an environment where people feel safe to engage, where anyone in or impacted by an organisation is empowered to report concerns when they arise (Bond 2021).

A positive culture establishes behaviours that support safeguarding as the correct way to behave. It should provide a ‘culture and ethos with values and behaviours that are articulated and lived at each level of organisation’ (Wonacott and Carmi, 2016).

Obviously, for a safe organisational culture to be effective and successful it needs to embed the right values and behaviours that should be articulated at every level of an organisation.


How to develop a positive safeguarding culture

An illustration of several people working together to water a giant plant in a giant pot. The people are standing on ladders to do this. In the centre of the plant is a lightbulb (yes, yet another one).
© ANDREI NIKOLAEV / iStock / Getty Images Plus

It is important to have a positive culture in place to ensure the robust implementation of safeguarding measures.

The protection and wellbeing of everyone involved in your organisation’s work must be central to everything that you do and must do more than just meet minimum compliance standards. This will encourage people to feel safe to come forward and raise their concerns.

This last point is particularly important, reflecting the principles of collaborative and inclusive learning with all stakeholders involved, including those who are often marginalised and excluded.

A successful organisational safeguarding culture should exist where organisations:

  • Have articulated a commitment to a zero tolerance to all forms of harm, particularly sexual misconduct.
  • Have managers who lead by example and foster good relationships with their staff.
  • Have in place accessible, safe and confidential reporting mechanisms (respecting anonymity if required).
  • Take complaints and concerns seriously and have put steps in place to safeguard the complainant.
  • Provide independent whistleblowing procedures that everyone is aware of and which clearly explain how to report a concern and to whom.
  • Undertake risk assessments for safe programming and activities.
  • Provide safe spaces to challenge conscious or unconscious bias against gender, disability, age or any other discriminatory factors.
  • Make decisions in the best interests of the survivor (survivor-centred).
  • Ensure that there are clear and trusted whistleblowing processes in place, ideally external to the organisation.

Green reflection image

Drawing on your learning of the principles of accountability and survivor-centredness in Unit 5, reflect on what the impact would be for survivors and other staff if the culture is not supportive and respectful to them.

6.2 The role of leadership

An illustration of tangled lines on the left-hand side which go into a circular smiley face. When the lines come out on the right-hand side of the face, they become straight arrows.
© phototechno / iStock / Getty Images Plus

The tone and culture in an organisation is often set by the behaviour of those in the leadership team. You will remember Principle 6 of the IASC PSEA Task Force standards states:

Humanitarian workers are obliged to create and maintain an environment which prevents sexual exploitation and abuse and promotes the implementation of their code of conduct. Managers at all levels have particular responsibilities to support and develop systems which maintain this environment.

Therefore, managers at all levels must steer the development, communication and reinforcement of a positive safeguarding culture. Everything that leaders communicate, say or do is visible and has an influence on the rest of the organisation.

Some practical and meaningful ways that leaders impact the culture include:

  • The extent to which their words match their deeds and how this is handled when they don’t.
  • The way in which they are seen to handle failure.
  • The way in which their values are seen to be lived and acted out.
  • The way in which their interactions and relationships with other senior managers are experienced by the wider organisation.
  • The decisions they make about who is hired and who is fired, and why.
  • The decisions they make about who is valued and rewarded, who isn’t, and why.
  • The systems and processes that they champion and prioritise.

Organisations that encourage open conversations about safeguarding, and where suspected or alleged abuse and neglect can be readily reported, will have a strong culture of safeguarding and are more likely to be in a better position to mitigate against risk, prevent harm and respond effectively.

It is also essential that each member of staff feels that his or her dignity is recognised and respected through an ethos of nurturing a supportive workplace and is respectful towards each other. A respectful workplace brings enormous benefits to organisations and there are negative ramifications of not paying enough attention to this.

It is important that Safeguarding Leads and senior colleagues:

  • Make support available for anyone raising concerns. This could include having Safeguarding Leads/focal points or champions.
  • Encourage staff to look out for changes in the behaviour of children, vulnerable adults, staff and associated personnel that they work with, as this could indicate exploitation, abuse, and harassment.
  • Ensure that any changes or other concerns are recorded and shared as soon as possible within the confines of confidentiality, and immediate action is taken if exploitation abuse or harassment is considered or suspected.

Blue reflection icon

Activity 6.1 Case study

Read the case study below and consider the following questions:

  • How did ABC-AID’s managers and leaders respond to the concerns which arose?
  • What role did organisational culture play in the response?

ABC-AID is an international NGO working with refugees and displaced populations. It has a zero tolerance toward sexual misconduct and all staff and associated personnel are requested to sign the code of conduct.

Pedro is a driver for ABC-AID and recently Hami, the senior medical officer, asked Pedro to bring two refugee girls from the camp to a nearby guesthouse to meet Hami. Hami is well connected with local politicians and gets on very well with senior management. Pedro complied with Hami’s request, but it made him feel uneasy. Pedro was later reminded that not reporting safeguarding concerns, especially sexual misconduct, would also be a breach of the code of conduct, and he could get into trouble if it ever came out. He spoke to Mary, the field coordinator.

Mary, the field coordinator did not know what to do, so she emailed the deputy director. The deputy director was on leave and learnt about the driver’s story when he returned two weeks later. He then informed the country director. The country director decided to do a preliminary investigation and asked Mary, the field coordinator, to ‘find out what was going on’. All the senior staff working in this location live together in a shared house and get on very well together.

In the meantime, one of the girls, aged 14, who had been taken to the guesthouse, approached Ling, the co-ordinator of a gender-based violence programme, run by a different NGO. News had reached her father of her sexual relationship with an aid worker, and her father had beaten her and then thrown her out of the family home. Ling informed the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR, the UN’s Refugee Agency) that the girl was in need of housing and support, using the radio, as this was the only means of communication.

The UNHCR, which funds ABC-AID, reported its concerns to ABC-AID and insisted they proceed with an internal investigation immediately. When the allegations were substantiated at the end of an independent investigation, the country director did not want to start disciplinary proceedings against Hami, as Hami was well-connected to local politicians.

(© Adapted case study from CHS Alliance, PSEA Investigations Training Toolkit)

View comment

Blue video icon

Activity 6.2 Organisational culture interview

View transcript

Watch the video above from WaterAid regarding organisational culture and working with partners during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Having watched the video, reflect on the following question and make notes in your learning journal:

  • How do these organisational measures compare to those in your organisation?

6.3 Useful tools to reflect on safeguarding values

An illustration of a workman’s toolkit. In it is a spirit level, pencil, ruler, hammer, spanner and a screwdriver.
© MaksimYremenko / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Whether explicit or implicit, organisational values guide decision-making. Safeguarding policies should all reflect that ‘safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility’.

However, while this might exist in your policy, is the understanding of this value the same at governance, leadership and staff levels? Or even with other learners undertaking this course?

In her book on creating a sustainable culture, Perkins (2019) suggests that four sets of questions can help to explore values and culture. These four sets, whilst not written for the international aid sector specifically, can be applied to this context by providing a useful tool on how to reflect on the safeguarding values of your organisation.

The questions are detailed below and provide a tool to critically evaluate the values that underpin your organisation’s safeguarding culture.

Review your stories:

  • Is there an understanding of safeguarding in your organisation? When a culture reflects on the experiences of members of an organisation, we can sometimes gain insight into the factors that influence the behaviour of people who work for or represent the organisation.

Explore how staff perceive safeguarding leadership:

  • Does everyone know how to achieve and communicate organisational vision and values to others? For example, we might talk about valuing every child and vulnerable adult, but does everyone see this and value it in all aspects of the organisation such as fund raising, operations and its programmes?
  • Is safeguarding integral to all programmes at all times or is it only considered when donors demand it, such as in due diligence assessments? Perkins (2019) argues that exposing divergences can allow work to be undertaken which, in this context, will adapt and improve the safeguarding culture of an organisation.

Observe behaviours:

  • Do your values come through in the work that is undertaken within your organisation? What do you see your staff or other colleagues doing?
  • Are colleagues approachable to raise concerns?
  • Do they truly listen to partners and the recipients of the services or programmes?
  • Do staff and/or beneficiaries come forward to report? Do they trust the reporting mechanisms?
  • Are there some staff who exempt themselves from the behaviour of the rest of the system?
  • Is there data that clearly indicates trends on perspective of behaviour? For example, gender-based violence (GBV) prevails across class and cultural boundaries, but do people come forward with concerns, or does it remain hidden?

Discuss together how safeguarding values are interpreted:

  • Do you have regular conversations with leaders, your staff, and colleagues about safeguarding within your organisation?
  • Does everyone demonstrate the same values when you have these discussions?
  • Do senior leaders regularly share insights around safeguarding that bring the issues to life in a meaningful way for staff? This is one way of helping all to interpret safeguarding values in the same way. An effective safeguarding culture will evidence this.
  • Do leaders demonstrate ‘doing the right thing’ for survivors by placing them at the heart of their response, even above the interests of the organisation (for example, the risk to fundraising) and do they ensure there is a strong track record of support? (Bond, 2021)

Blue further reading icon

You can explore this issue further through the following readings:


Report handling mechanisms

At the core of effective safeguarding systems and processes will be a robust system for handling reports to ensure an effective safeguarding response for everyone, including children and vulnerable adults.

This happens through carefully managed information sharing within the confines of confidentiality and timely safeguarding responses. You will have seen in the earlier case study of ABC-AID that there was no such system to record and share information on a need-to-know basis in line with data protection laws and good practice.

Such a system would allow concerns to be tracked and monitored. It would also help to gauge the number of complaints and concerns received and help identify patterns, themes or trends.

Policies and systems need to be clear as to who can log concerns and incidents. They need to state who will update case files through the life of a case, specifying what data needs to be recorded when. There needs to be clear guidance on who has access to the different safeguarding documentation and records, and how to escalate matters to law enforcement or other external bodies.

And when a case is closed there should be a list of who needs to be informed, and a way that the learning from the case can be harnessed and disseminated through the organisation. The safeguarding focal point and senior leadership team oversee all the above. Robust and safe complaints mechanisms will help share staff perceptions, behaviours and culture within the organisation.

Blue reflection icon

Activity 6.3 Improving you report handling mechanisms

  • How might you ensure that your safeguarding report handing mechanisms include robust documentation, record keeping and sharing only on a need-to-know basis?

View comment

Blue further reading icon

Further reading

Developing and modelling a positive safeguarding culture: A tool for leaders (Bond)


Timeliness

An illustration of two outstretched arms. The arm on the left-hand side is holding an alarm clock. The arm on the right-hand side has its palm facing upwards ready to receive the clock.
© tommy / Getty Images

You would have noted from the ABC-AID case study that there was a considerable delay in raising concerns which had an impact on the lives of the child survivors in that case.

Such concerns would also have had a huge impact on the name and reputation of the organisation and the international aid sector.

Organisational safeguarding policies should detail the following:

  • What, how and where to record concerns?
  • Who to share information with, and for what purpose?
  • How to make decisions and processes based on risk assessments?
  • Cover actions required for the survivor/victim(s) as well as the Subject(s) of Complaint.
  • Service providers, who have been assessed in their capacity to respond to diverse individuals, need to be mapped out and included in a referral pathway that links with the safeguarding report-handling mechanism. This should be regularly updated.
  • Support for staff survivors must be explicitly explained. Confidentiality issues may be more complex in these scenarios.

Remember: there should always be a timeframe for actions as some aspects of safeguarding have life-and-death consequences. Others may impact on long-term mental and physical health, psychosocial wellbeing, and the livelihoods of individuals or safety considerations for wider staff or community members.

It is important to respond quickly to enable the Safeguarding Lead or investigations teams to gather evidence; accurately record the incident details as recalled by the survivor or witnesses; ensure the immediate safety of parties to the incident; and prevent further incidents or harm from occurring.

A timely response to any incidents or concerns shared with the organisation also shows respect for all those involved.


Safe spaces

The ABC-AID case study also demonstrates that policies and processes can be in place, and yet safeguarding incidents and breaches of policies and processes can still happen.

Being mindful of the need to constantly strengthen your safeguarding culture is part of the role description for Safeguarding Leads and senior leadership teams.

But what does this look like?

  • Ensuring that there are safe spaces for staff and others to speak out against poor practice and areas of concern without imposing sanctions.
  • Listening.
  • Sharing what’s working in implementing safeguarding and learning from others.
  • Providing avenues to help and support when a concern is identified.

Of course, it is not always easy to challenge poor practice. It can be difficult and takes courage, as in some situations there may be unpleasant consequences for all those involved.

As a Safeguarding Lead or focal point, here are some tips:

  1. Ensure you are familiar with local policy for raising safeguarding concerns within your organisation.
  2. Seek support as soon as possible. Ask yourself – do I need some help here? Do you need to talk to a relevant colleague or your manager?
  3. If the behaviour is one that has low-lying risk, could you talk directly to the person whose behaviour you have concerns about?
  4. If the answer to question 3 is no, escalate your concern to a more senior colleague in the organisation or, if you do talk to the person directly but still have concerns, you will also need to escalate these. Remember: such concerns may relate to one individual’s behaviour towards another, a child or vulnerable adult, or they may relate to a lack of response to a concern.
  5. Keep a log/timeline and record your concerns and notes from any related conversations. However small the concern is, it is important to keep a written record as it could escalate at a later date and your evidence may be required as part of the reporting process.
  6. Whatever role you have, remember you have a responsibility to speak up and raise your concerns if you believe there is a risk to a child, vulnerable adult, colleague or any other.

All staff and volunteers should feel empowered and supported to challenge poor safeguarding practices and feel confident that their concerns will be followed. It is equally important that organisations listen to concerns and address them quickly. This will provide a safer organisational culture for all.


Confidentiality

As a child, did you ever play a game called ‘Whispers’?

This is where everyone stands in a line or a circle. The first person has some important information and whispers it into the ear of a second person. The first person is not allowed to repeat it. The second person then whispers what he or she heard to the third person. The third person then whispers what she or he heard to the fourth person and so on. At the end, the last person in the line or circle reveals what they heard. It is usually completely different from what the first person said!

Reflect on the learning of this game. If someone is concerned and they talk to someone about it, that second person will repeat what they think they heard to the third person, and so on. It’s how rumours start, and while all this is going on, more victims could be abused because no one is taking any effective action!

To prevent rumour mongering and safeguard confidentiality and privacy for survivors/victims as well as for Subjects of Complaints, it is important that everyone in your organisation understands who is responsible for safeguarding and how to reach them.

6.4 Monitoring, learning and good supervision

Monitoring tools to measure safeguarding

It’s important that organisations monitor the progress they have made in implementing the many safeguarding measures they may have identified and developed since they started their safeguarding journey.

For example, when monitoring safeguarding practice and culture in education, the Girls’ Education Challenge developed a monitoring tool which includes monitoring the knowledge and awareness of teachers to ensure they understand their safeguarding responsibilities.

To elicit feedback and complaints from students, they hold focus group discussions by undertaking a risk assessment to ensure no further harm ensues from the activity.

Other possibilities might include surveys (including e-surveys) and focus groups to gage feedback and monitor how safeguarding measures and being implemented.


Action Learning Sets

Action Learning Sets (ALS) is a process that was developed in the 1950s.

ALS is a simple but powerful way for individuals to learn from each other and identify actions which could make a positive difference.

The emphasis is on learning from real experiences and challenges, using the knowledge and skills of small group stakeholders, and utilising skilled questioning to produce fresh ideas for action.

The questions used during the session could be:

  • What do we really want to achieve?
  • What is stopping us?
  • What could we do about it?
  • Who has knowledge that we could use?
  • Who has an interest in solving the problem?
  • Who has the power to get something done?

(Source: Reg Revans, Action Learning)


Learning reviews

A circular diagram. The arrows are all pointing in a clockwise direction. The text is split into five points. Number one says what could have prevented harm in the first place? For example, recruitment, training, risk assessment, etc. Number two says what went well or did not go well with the reporting of concerns? For example, timeliness, confidentiality, risk assessment. Number three says what went well or did not go well managing the concern? For example, referral mechanisms, support for survivors, timeliness, confidentiality. Number four says what went well with the investigators. What could be improved? For example, impartiality, legal advice, support for all, etc. Number five says action planning. What needs to change? Who will be in charge for each action? When will this be implemented and when will it be reviewed?
(© Adapted from Child Safeguarding Practice Review, Working Together, 2018)

It is good practice for organisations to hold learning reviews whether there has been a ‘near miss’ or a full investigation into a safeguarding concern.

The purpose of a learning review is to:

  • Identify improvements to be made to safeguard and promote the welfare of victims/survivors.
  • Seek to prevent or reduce the risk of recurrence of similar incidents.
  • Establish whether there are lessons to be learnt from the case about the way in which organisations can work in a safer way.
  • Identify clearly what those lessons are, how they will be acted upon, and what is expected to change as a result.
  • Improve internal and inter-agency working.

Learning reviews should be facilitated by someone who was not involved in the managing or investigation process of the safeguarding concern. Those who were involved could either write in their feedback or be present at a meeting where views are elicited to the questions in the diagram above.

Questions the learning facilitator could ask include:

  1. What went well with the reporting of the concern? What could be improved on?
  2. What went well with the organisational management and response to the concern? What could be improved on?
  3. What went well with the investigations to that concern? What could be improved on?
  4. What went well with the next steps to the concern. What could be improved on?

It’s important for organisations to set aside time and a safe space to reflect on their safeguarding practice, particularly after a near miss or investigation.

Safeguarding people is an emotive and sensitive subject. It’s important that everyone understands that it is a collective effort to improve the culture and requires practice within the organisation to keep people safe.

Embedding a culture of learning is not about blaming anyone, but rather clarifying how organisational factors can cause harm, using techniques to avoid bias, being factual, telling it as it was, transparency and accountability.

Green reflection icon

Have you ever used a learning review in your organisation? Might they be helpful in identifying valuable learning from previous experiences?



Good supervision

Blue video icon

View transcript

Watch the video above in which Sherine, a learner on this course, has a question about learning reviews.

An illustration of people sitting around a table

A key monitoring tool for good safeguarding culture is supervision.

This is an important role for line managers, and they need to know how to manage those who are in stressful positions, such as Safeguarding Leads or focal persons.

You can be supported using good supervision methods such as:

Reflective supervision

These are sessions which allow you the opportunity to discuss uncertainties and to explore your practice critically but in a supportive and safe context. Reflective supervision sessions involve thinking through previous practices and exploring what happened, what you did, and why you made decisions and acted or behaved in particular ways. Discussing how you feel about the actions of others is also important.

Reflective supervision enables continual learning by identifying what you did well, what you could have done better and what you will do next time.

Collaboration supervision

The concept of collaboration (or teamwork) emphasises sharing the responsibility and control of power. Power can be derived from many sources, among them being the position in the organisation, the ability to lead and inspire, the sphere of influence, and the network of colleagues. But most of all, power is derived from knowledge – about children and families, about the field, and about us in the workplace.

While sharing power is the goal of collaboration, it does not exempt supervisors from setting limits or exercising authority. These responsibilities remain firmly within the supervisor’s domain. Collaboration does, however, allow for a dialogue on issues affecting the staff person and the programme.

Regular supervision

Neither reflection nor collaboration will occur without regular interactions. Supervision should take place on a reliable schedule, and sufficient time must be allocated to its practice. Supervision time is precious and may be hard to come by. It should therefore be protected from cancellation, rescheduling or procrastination.

(Source: ZerotoThree)

Supervisors should be actively listening during supervision. The supervisor provides an empathetic, non-judgmental ear to those they supervise. Working through complex emotions in a ‘safe place’ allows the supervisee to manage the stress they experience on the job. Good supervision requires open communication which flows freely in both directions and is protected from ‘outsiders’. Both parties assume the best about each other.

The supervisory relationship is one characterised by a feeling of trust and safety, where difficult issues can be discussed without fear of judgment, disclosure, or ridicule. Open communication implies curiosity and active listening

Show respect to each other and treat others as you would want to be treated in the discussion forum. Remember to keep confidentiality and not reveal identifying details of children or vulnerable adults in your comments.

Blue reflection icon

Activity 6.4 Checklist on a good safeguarding culture

We are concluding this unit with some checklists which you can use to review aspects of your organisation’s safeguarding culture. They are on policies and procedures, a survivor centred approach, and awareness raising. For each statement in the tables consider how your own organisation compares and identify any areas for improvement.

Here is a writable version of each template shown below. You can type into this PDF form and then save it and/or print it.

Policies and procedures

Policies and procedures. The table has three columns and four rows. The column headers are Policies and procedures, Criteria – 1. Met, 2. Partially met, 3. Not met, and Areas of improvement. The second and third column are blank. There are four rows in column one. The first row is A robust and effective policy exists, is a key part of induction and is lived day-to-day, with supporting processes in place which are used regularly. The second row is Policy is well integrated: policies are well understood by everyone in the organisation and staff proactively refer and adhere to policy and processes, which guide behaviour and actions. The third row is All staff and other adults working within the organisation are clear about procedures where they are concerned about the safety of a child or vulnerable adult. The fourth row is Relevant organisational policies have safeguarding as an integrated element.

Survivor-centred approach

Survivor-centred approach. The table has three columns and six rows. The column headers are Survivor-centred approach, Criteria – 1. Met, 2. Partially met, 3. Not met, and Areas of improvement. The second and third column are blank. There are six rows in column one. The first row is Children and vulnerable adults are protected and feel safe. The second row is Survivors report that the organisation is a safe place for the employment of survivors. The third row is There is a strong, robust, and proactive response from adults working with children that reduces the risk of harm or actual harm to them. The fourth row is Children can identify a trusted adult with whom they can communicate any concerns (a trusted adult being someone who children may turn to for help and who will take them seriously and act responsibly to ensure that risks are mitigated to prevent harm and concerns are responded to effectively). The fifth row is Children report that adults listen to them and take their concerns seriously. The sixth row is Survivors are consulted and involved in determining the response to their concerns.

Awareness-raising

Awareness-raising. The table has three columns and nine rows. The column headers are Awareness-raising, Criteria – 1. Met, 2. Partially met, 3. Not met, and Areas of improvement. The second and third column are blank. There are nine rows in column one. The first row is There are regular open discussions and ongoing dialogue about safeguarding with all stakeholders. The second row is Adults working with children and vulnerable adults know and understand the indicators that may suggest that an individual is suffering or at risk of suffering exploitation, abuse and/or harassment, and that they must take appropriate and necessary action in accordance with local procedures and relevant international legislation. The third row is Safeguarding training is available and accessible to all staff. The fourth row is the relevance of safeguarding training is understood by all. The fifth row is The physical environment for children and vulnerable adults is safe and secure and protects them from the risk of harm or actual harm. The sixth row is Children and vulnerable adults who go missing are reported. The seventh row is Risks of harm to children and vulnerable people are well understood during the implementation of programmes and activities, and their impact is minimised. The eighth row is There are strategies in place to minimise the risks from digital technologies for staff, children and vulnerable adults. The ninth row is There are policies in place about the safe use of mobile phones and cameras for adults working with children, young people, and vulnerable adults (as covered in Week 3).

(Source: 20 core elements: a toolkit to strengthen safeguarding report-handling – Bond, 2019)

6.5 Unit 6 Knowledge check

The end-of-unit knowledge check is a great way to check your understanding of what you have learnt.

There are five questions, and you can have up to 3 attempts at each question depending on the question type. The quizzes at the end of each unit count towards achieving your Digital Badge for the course. You must score at least 80% in each quiz to achieve the Statement of Participation and Digital Badge.

Enter quiz

6.6 Congratulations on completing this course

Blue video icon

View transcript

Watch the video above where the Lead Academic, Jan Webb, congratulates you on completing this 24-hour course Implementing Safeguarding in the International Aid Sector.

The video explains that there is a third and final course in this series Leadership in Safeguarding in the International Aid Sector, which is now available as a course on OpenLearn Create).

We are pleased to inform learners that we have also produced a new training aid called Safeguarding in the International Aid Sector: Training Toolkit.

This toolkit has been created to support you to disseminate the learning from Courses 1 and 2 to other people in your organisation and/or people in your partner organisation.

You can access this free PDF resource here.

6.7 Review of Unit 6

A decorative image depicting an illustration of an arm holding a magnifying glass. Behind the glass are lots of typed documents and papers.
© Feodora Chiosea / iStock / Getty Images Plus

In this final unit of the course, we focused on how you can implement your knowledge and skills to strengthen your organisation’s safeguarding culture.

The content provided opportunities for you to reflect on your knowledge and skills and how you might also use them to strengthen a safeguarding culture within the international aid sector. There is a lot of guidance on safeguarding in the international aid sector, and a mandate for organisations to designate Safeguarding Leads at senior leadership and board levels.

It is also important that every member of an organisation understands the safeguarding policy and relevant legislation and is effectively and regularly trained in safeguarding throughout their career. Safeguarding training should occur at every level and for every role.

We also applied our learning to a case study related to strengthening a safeguarding culture. The case study and the video with WaterAid further highlighted the importance of implementing knowledge and skills at an individual and organisational level to embed and strengthen a safeguarding culture.

Blue reflection icon

Learning journal

Before you finish Unit 6, reflect on your own learning so far. Consider the following questions and respond to them in your learning journal:

  • What was the most significant thing you learnt in this unit?
  • How would you apply your learning to the work that you do?

Post-course survey

Please Ctrl + click on this post-course survey that will take about 5 minutes to complete.

Your feedback will additionally help the academic team gauge if this course has made any difference to your knowledge, skills, practice or your confidence level. All responses are anonymised, so we are not able to know or identify individual respondents.

Thank you in advance!

Blue further reading icon

Further reading

Facilitator’s Guide to Organisational Values and Culture RSH

References

Bond (2021) Understanding effective safeguarding culture: A toolkit to help organisations understand the behaviours associated with safeguarding culture, Online. Available at Bond (Accessed 20 September 2021).

Bond (2019) 20 core elements: a toolkit to strengthen safeguarding report-handling, Online. Available at Bond (PDF) (Accessed 20 September 2021).

Perkins, K. M. (2019) Leadership and Purpose: How to create a sustainable culture, London, Routledge.

Wonacott, J. and Carmi, E. (2016) Serious Case Review: Southbank International School, Hammersmith & Fulham, Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster LSCB, Online. Available at LSCB (PDF) (Accessed 20 September 2021).

Williams, A. (2018) A respectful organisational culture is crucial to safeguarding, Online. Available at Bond (Accessed 20 September 2021).

Woodhouse, J. (2019) ‘Leading a safeguarding culture’, Safeguarding Network, Online. Available at Safeguarding Network (Accessed 20 September 2021).

Zero to Three (2016) Three Building Blocks to Effective Supervision, Online. Available at Zero to Three (Accessed 20 September 2021).

Acknowledgements

Grateful acknowledgement is made to the following sources:

Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders. If any have been inadvertently overlooked the publishers will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at the first opportunity.

Important: *** against any of the acknowledgements below means that the wording has been dictated by the rights holder/publisher, and cannot be changed.

Unit 1:

Images

Section 1.2: elenabs / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 1.3: Taken from favpng.com

Section 1.5: Bet_Noire / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 1.5: BRO Vector / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 1.7: ID 103981787 © Pichit Boonhuad / Dreamstime.com

Section 1.6: gmast3r / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 1.10: Feodora Chiosea / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Text 1.6: Inter-Agency Standing Committee (2016) Minimum Operating Standards (MOS-PSEA), https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/iasc-task-team-accountability-affected-populations-and-protection-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse/minimum-operating-standards-mos-psea Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Video 1.1: Video: © The Open University / Images: Parentingupstream / Pixabay, Udo Voigt / Pixabay, Bernd Müller / Pixabay, Halcyon Marine Healthcare Systems / Pixabay, fernando zhiminaicela / Pixabay, Tammy Lee / Pixabay, felixioncool / Pixabay, Jess Foami / Pixabay, Adabara Ibrahim / Pixabay, go_see / Pixabay, stokpic / Pixabay, criss_chengck10339 / Pixabay, ludi / Pixabay, David Mark / Pixabay, AkshayaPatra Foundation / Pixabay, PublicDomainPictures / Pixabay, EastSons GoodWorks / Pixabay, truthseeker08 / Pixabay, David Mark / Pixabay, Ian Ingalula / Pixabay, AkshayaPatra Foundation / Pixabay)

Videos 1.6, 1.7: Safeguarding Resource and Support Hub

Video 1.8: Created by the IASC in Bangladesh, https://youtu.be/HMrxQ6kjV-o This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Unit 2:

Images

Section 2.1 Martin Barraud / Getty Images

Section 2.1: MHJ / Getty Images

Section 2.2: daz2d / Getty Images

Section 2.3: patpitchaya / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 2.4: MicroStockHub / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 2.4: Panuwat Dangsungnoen / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 2.5: Talaj / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 2.7: Feodora Chiosea / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Video 2.2: Professor Peter Hopkins, Newcastle University

Video 2.5: Safeguarding Resource and Support Hub

Videos 2.4, 2.5, 2.18: Video: © The Open University (Audio: prosoundfx / Envato Elements, TibaSFX / Envato Elements, GameChestAudio / Envato Elements, sonic-boom / Envato Elements, JiltedGeneration / Envato Elements) (Images: mamanamsai / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, MaxRiesgo / iStock / Getty Images Plus, creativevip / Envato Elements, MissChatZ / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements)

Unit 3:

Images:

Section 3.1: Adapted from information on Child Participation, Child to Child, http://www.childtochild.org.uk/

Section 3.4: Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence, Italy: United Nations Children’s Fund International Child Development Centre.

Section 3.2: Marco VDM / Getty Images

Section 3.3: The Lucy Faithfull Foundation

Section 3.3: Photo 143396223 © Kenishirotie / Dreamstime.com

Section 3.3: bgwalker / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 3.4: natasaadzic / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 3.5: Internet Watch Foundation (2020) Analysis of individual image hashes by age of the child and severity of the abuse, IWF Annual Report 2020, https://annualreport2020.iwf.org.uk/trends/international/overview

Section 3.5: tommaso79 / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 3.8: Feodora Chiosea / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Text: 3.2: Watters, L., and Orsander, M. (2021) Disability-inclusive child safeguarding guidelines, Able Child Africa and Save the Children, https://ablechildafrica.org/news/6759/

Text 3.3: Adapted from bond (2019) Safeguarding report-handling mechanism: Case studies (CC BY-NC 4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

NSPCC Learning, https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/media/1600/online-safety-policy-statement-example.pdf Further resources available at https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/

Video 3.2: © Able Child Africa 2021.

Video 3.2: SENSE International

Video 3.2: SENSE International

Video 3.4: UNICEF Office of Global Insight and Policy

Video 3.5: Video: © The Open University (Audio: prosoundfx / Envato Elements, TibaSFX / Envato Elements, GameChestAudio / Envato Elements, sonic-boom / Envato Elements, JiltedGeneration / Envato Elements) (Images: mamanamsai / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, PIKSEL / iStock / Getty Images Plus, creativevip / Envato Elements, MissChatZ / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements)

Video 3.7: Video: © The Open University (Images: StockSnap / Pixabay, RAEng_Publications / Pixabay, Jess Foami / Pixabay, Free-Photos / Pixabay, Div_Iv / Pixabay, CDC / Pexels, Sam Chen / Pixabay, StartupStockPhotos / Pixabay, Freelance Grafiker / Pixabay, Pashminu Mansukhani / Pixabay, SENSE International)

Unit 4:

Images:

Section 4.2: Serhii Radachynskyi / 123RF

Section 4.2: Ponomariova_Maria / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 4.2: stock_colors / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 4.2: ljubaphoto / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 4.3: infografx / 123RF

Section 4.4: danijelala / Getty Imagess

Section 4.5: Christian Horz / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 4.5: Photo 108018033 © Rawpixelimages / Dreamstime.com

Section 4.5: baona / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 4.5: Adapted from Tool 4: Sexual violence response task list, Global Interagency Security Forum (GISF), https://gisf.ngo/resource/managing-sexual-violence-against-aid-workers/

Section 4.6: natasaadzic / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 4.8: Feodora Chiosea / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Text 4.2: Based on Galop (2019) Barriers Faced by Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender + (LGBT+) People in Accessing Non-LGBT+ Domestic Abuse Support Services, https://galop.org.uk/resource/resource-f/

Text 4.5: Mapping tool: Adapted from Mapping Tool for GBV Services, IASC PSEA, https://psea.interagencystandingcommittee.org/resources/mapping-tool-gbv-services

Text 4.5: Adapted from Tool 4: Sexual violence response task list, Global Interagency Security Forum (GISF), https://gisf.ngo/resource/managing-sexual-violence-against-aid-workers/

Text 4.6: Megan Nobert and Christine Williamson, Duty of Care: Protection of Humanitarian Aid Workers from Sexual Violence, Report the Abuse, August 2017.

Video 4.3: © E-magination Training

Video 4.5: Video: © The Open University (Audio: prosoundfx / Envato Elements, TibaSFX / Envato Elements, GameChestAudio / Envato Elements, sonic-boom / Envato Elements, JiltedGeneration / Envato Elements) (Images: mamanamsai / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, MaxRiesgo / iStock / Getty Images Plus, creativevip / Envato Elements, MissChatZ / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements)

Video 4.6: Video: © The Open University (Images: Lailatul Ferdous / BSMMU Bangladesh, Hannah Olinger / Unsplash, JonHoefer / Pixabay)

Unit 5:

Images:

Section 5.1: phototechno / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 5.1: The Open University (Images (left to right): Photo by Redd on Unsplash, Photo by Amy Hirschi on Unsplash, Photo by Headway on Unsplash)

Section 5.1: Vladimir Kononok / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 5.2: Enis Aksoy / Getty Images

Section 5.3: ID 144750017 © Fizkes / Dreamstime.com

Section 5.3: ID 67005947 © Aleem Zahid Khan / Dreamstime.com

Section 5.4: ID 74791781 © Rawpixelimages / Dreamstime.com

Section 5.5: GOCMEN / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 5.7: Feodora Chiosea / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Video 5.8: © IntegrityAction.org, https://integrityaction.org/

Video 5.12: Nesta, https://vimeo.com/103698691 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Video 5.16: WaterAid

Video 5.21: Video: © The Open University (Images: Plan International Zimbabwe, Lagos Food Bank Initiative / Pexels, L.Steward Masweneng / Unsplash, Danique Tersmette / Unsplash)

Video 5.22: Witness.org, https://youtu.be/K5PBs9vIC4c Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Unit 6:

Images:

Section 6.1: ID 150858883 © Shuang Wang / Dreamstime.com

Section 6.1: ANDREI NIKOLAEV / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 6.2: phototechno / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 6.3: MaksimYremenko / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Section 6.3: tommy / Getty Images

Section 6.4: Adapted from Department for Education (2018) Child Safeguarding Practice Review, Working Together, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children–2 Reproduced under the terms of the Open Government License v3.0, https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Section 6.7: Feodora Chiosea / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Text 6.2: Inter-Agency Standing Committee (2019) IASC Six Core Principles Relating to Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, 2019, 23 September 2019, https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/inter-agency-standing-committee/iasc-six-core-principles-relating-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse This file is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Text 6.2: Adapted case study from CHS Alliance, PSEA Investigations Training Toolkit Supervision methods: ‘Three Building Blocks of Reflective Supervision’, Zero to Three, https://www.zerotothree.org/resources/412-three-building-blocks-of-reflective-supervision#chapter-246

Text 6.4: Policies and Procedures: Adapted from Bond (2019) 20 core elements: a toolkit to strengthen safeguarding report-handling, https://www.bond.org.uk/sites/default/files/bond_20_core_elements_a_toolkit_to_strengthen_safeguarding.pdf Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Text 6.4: Survivor-Centred Approach: Adapted from Bond (2019) 20 core elements: a toolkit to strengthen safeguarding report-handling, https://www.bond.org.uk/sites/default/files/bond_20_core_elements_a_toolkit_to_strengthen_safeguarding.pdf Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Text 6.4: Awareness raising: Adapted from Bond (2019) 20 core elements: a toolkit to strengthen safeguarding report-handling, https://www.bond.org.uk/sites/default/files/bond_20_core_elements_a_toolkit_to_strengthen_safeguarding.pdf Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Video 6.2: Video: © The Open University (Images and footage: Mahesh Dhungana - WaterAid Nepal)

Video 6.4: Video: © The Open University (Audio: prosoundfx / Envato Elements, TibaSFX / Envato Elements, GameChestAudio / Envato Elements, sonic-boom / Envato Elements, JiltedGeneration / Envato Elements) (Images: mamanamsai / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, barsrsind / Envato Elements, PIKSEL / iStock / Getty Images Plus, creativevip / Envato Elements, MissChatZ / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements)

Video 6.6: Video: © The Open University (Images: criss_chengck10339 / Pixabay, truthseeker08 / Pixabay, Gundula Vogel / Pixabay, mamanamsai / Envato Elements, creativevip / Envato Elements, MissChatZ / Envato Elements, MaxRiesgo / iStock / Getty Images Plus, barsrsind / Envato Elements, Brian Odwar / Pixabay, tdam94 / Pixabay, Image by pakkalajuha from Pixabay