Move to the next page by clicking the arrow on the top right to move to the next page in this section.
| Site: | OpenLearn Create |
| Course: | Digital Detectives: Understanding Communication in Digital Forensic Evidence |
| Book: | Part 2 - The Clarus Multi-Lingual Lexicon for Digital Forensics |
| Printed by: | Guest user |
| Date: | Thursday, 10 September 2026, 9:09 PM |
Explore the Lexicon - View the Lexicon in a new window here
Locate:
A term you understand ie “Chat”.
A term related to digital technology ie “Hardware” or “SIM Card”.
A term you have never encountered before.
Move to the next page by clicking the arrow on the top right to move to the next page in this section.
Language is constantly changing. New words appear, existing words take on new meanings, and terminology evolves alongside changes in society, technology and professional practice.
Digital technology provides many examples of this process. Terms such as "cloud storage", "cryptocurrency", and even "smartphone" would have been unfamiliar or used very differently not long ago. As technology develops, new concepts emerge and new language is created to describe them.
Digital forensic science faces the same challenge.
The devices, platforms and services that people use today are very different from those used ten or twenty years ago. New forms of communication, new methods of storing information and new types of digital evidence continue to appear. As these developments occur, the language used to describe them also changes.
This presents an ongoing challenge for anyone involved in digital investigations.
Professionals need terminology that allows them to communicate accurately and efficiently. At the same time, that terminology must remain understandable to people outside specialist fields, including investigators, lawyers, judges, journalists and members of the public.
This means that creating a shared understanding is not a one-time task. It requires ongoing review and adaptation.
The Multi-Lingual Lexicon for Digital Forensics was developed to support clearer communication, but like any language resource, it exists within a constantly evolving landscape. As technologies change and new terminology emerges, resources such as the lexicon may need to be updated to reflect new concepts and practices.
Move to the next page by clicking the arrow on the top right to move to the next page in this section.
Creating a shared vocabulary is not as simple as collecting a list of words.
Researchers had to consider:
Which terms should be included.
How definitions should be written.
Whether different professions use terms differently.
How concepts translate across languages.
How terminology changes over time.
The Clarus Lexicon was developed through collaboration between researchers, practitioners and subject experts from 6 European countries.
This process helped ensure that the definitions reflected real-world use while supporting consistency and clarity.
Developing a multilingual lexicon also required careful consideration of cultural and linguistic differences.
In some cases, there may not be a perfect one-to-one translation between languages. Instead, researchers worked to identify terms and definitions that best captured the underlying concept.
The Lexicon has potential value for a wide range of users involved in, affected by, or interested in digital forensic investigations. While it was developed through research with digital forensic and investigative practitioners, its benefits extend beyond those directly working with digital evidence.
These users may include:
Digital forensic practitioners.
Police officers and investigators.
Lawyers.
Judges.
Researchers.
Students.
Journalists.
Witnesses.
Jury members.
Members of the public.
Each group may use the Lexicon differently.
A digital forensic practitioner may use it to check how a term is translated in a different country or as a general tool to support consistent communication with colleagues from different organisations.
Investigators may use it to better understand technical concepts discussed during an investigation, while lawyers and judges may use it to help interpret terminology encountered in reports, witness statements, or court proceedings.
Researchers and students can use the Lexicon as an educational resource to explore key concepts and understand how terminology is used within digital forensic science.
Journalists may find it useful when reporting on investigations involving digital evidence, helping them communicate complex topics more accurately to wider audiences.
The Lexicon may also be valuable for members of the public.
Digital evidence increasingly plays a role in:
criminal investigations
legal proceedings
public inquiries
media reporting
As a result, people may encounter unfamiliar terms when following a news story or participating in legal processes.
The Lexicon can help users find clear explanations of these terms and better understand the role digital evidence plays in modern society.
Although users may have different needs, they all face a similar challenge: understanding terminology that can be technical, specialised, or interpreted differently by different groups.
By providing a shared point of reference, the Lexicon aims to support clearer communication, reduce misunderstandings, and promote a more consistent understanding of key concepts across professional and public audiences.
Move to the next page by clicking the arrow on the top right to move to the next page in this section.
As digital technologies become increasingly integrated into everyday life, the volume and variety of digital evidence will continue to grow.
New devices, applications and online services will create new opportunities and new challenges for investigators.
With these developments will come:
Supporting shared understanding will therefore remain an important part of ensuring that information can be communicated clearly, interpreted accurately and understood by a wide range of audiences.
The same terminology may not always be understood in the same way by different people or in different contexts.
Shared resources such as the Clarus Multi-Lingual Lexicon for Digital Forensics can help create a common reference point, supporting clearer communication and shared understanding across professional and language boundaries.
In this module, you explored why clear and consistent terminology matters when communicating about digital evidence.
You learned:
The Lexicon provides a shared reference point for digital forensic terminology, but terminology is only one part of clear communication.
How information is written and presented can also influence how it is understood. In the next module, you will explore another Clarus tool designed to help users reflect on their written communication: the Clarus Clarity Checker.
In the next module, you will be introduced to another Clarus project output: the Clarus Clarity Checker.
This tool has been developed to help users review written communication and identify language that may be unclear, ambiguous, or potentially biased.
This is the end of Part 2. From the drop-down menu on the left of the screen, select Module D Part 3 - Self Assessment Quiz.