Skip to main content
Printable page generated Tuesday, 6 October 2026, 11:32 AM
Use 'Print preview' to check the number of pages and printer settings.
Print functionality varies between browsers.
Unless otherwise stated, copyright © 2026 The Open University, all rights reserved.
Printable page generated Tuesday, 6 October 2026, 11:32 AM

4  General conduct

4  General conduct

Two people in a bright office meeting room shake hands across a table while another person sits nearby.

 

Section 3 of the Code covers how councillors are expected to behave. This includes:

  • the requirement to treat others with courtesy and respect
  • refraining from becoming inappropriately involved in operational matters
  • maintaining confidentiality
  • what you should consider and do when offered any gifts or hospitality.

Next, move onto 4.1  Confidentiality.

4.1  Confidentiality

The Code provides that you must not disclose confidential information, or information that should reasonably be regarded as confidential or private, without the express consent of a person or body authorised to give such consent. If you cannot obtain such consent, you should assume it is not given.

The Code makes it clear that confidential information is not only information deemed to be confidential by statute. It can also include discussions, documents and information that are not yet public, or were never intended to be public.

Confidential information includes:

  • commercial information such as information relating to a contract or a contractor’s business

  • personal or sensitive information such as information relating to an individual’s employment or health

  • information that is confidential as a result of a statutory provision

  • information discussed in closed or private sections of meetings

  • legal advice obtained by the Council (whether provided by officers or external legal advisers) – this is covered by legal privilege and must not be disclosed without the Council’s permission.

The Code states that you may use confidential information only to undertake your duties as a councillor. It must not be used for personal or party‑political advantage, or to discredit the Council – even if you believe the information should be publicly available.

Sometimes confidentiality relates to timing, in that the intention may always be to release the information at a later stage. However, you must respect any requirement for confidentiality even if you consider the information should be released earlier.

You should seek advice if you are in any doubt about whether documents, information or advice are confidential, particularly if you intend to disclose content to any outside body or individual.

Activity 3  Confidentiality

Timing: Allow around 6 minutes

A journalist approaches you and asks you to comment on the sale of a council building.

What, if anything, can or should you say? Which of the following factors could be relevant to the question of whether you can make any comment and whether there are any confidentiality considerations?

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is a.

a. 

Yes


b. 

Not necessarily


The correct answer is b.

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is a.

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is a.

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is b.

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is b.

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is a.

Discussion

It is usually appropriate to make no comment and refer the journalist to the Council’s communications or legal teams. You should contact those teams in advance about any comments you are proposing to make.

Even if the journalist already has some information, this does not necessarily mean it is in the public domain. Confidentiality may be a matter of timing: the Council may intend to release information but not until a later date, for example when any contract for the sale concludes. You must respect any requirement for confidentiality even if you do not agree with it.

In determining whether any information about the sale is confidential, consider whether you know about it because of your role as a councillor. You should consider how you became aware of it. Information may be explicitly marked as confidential (for example in a document headed ‘confidential’) or officers may advise that it must be treated as such. It may also be clear from the nature of the information or from the circumstances in which it was provided that it is confidential.

Confidential information must not be disclosed or used for personal advantage or to discredit the Council. A complaint about disclosure can be made regardless of intent or impact.

You should also consider whether:

  • any comments you make could be perceived as public criticism of officers – you should be conscious of the overall interests of the Council even if you wish to advocate a political point
  • whether you are likely to be involved in any formal decision-making concerning disposal of the property.

If it appears that the journalist has received confidential information, you should consider advising officers so they can assess what steps may be taken to limit any further disclosure.

4.2  Scrutiny

Person presenting ideas to colleagues in a modern office, gesturing toward a wall with sticky notes while others listen around a table.

 

Councillors are required to provide strategic leadership and oversight. This involves:

  • setting strategy and policy

  • scrutinising performance against strategic aims

  • making major or complex decisions that affect the Council as a whole.

Councillors are not responsible for operational management, which involves planning, organising, and carrying out day‑to‑day activities and service delivery. Operational management is the responsibility of officers. If you, as a councillor, become too involved in operational matters, you may lose focus on your strategic responsibilities.

It is recognised, however, that councillors are also required to be involved in certain operational matters when:

  • undertaking advocacy work, including any lobbying or campaigning

  • assisting local groups with community engagement and capacity-building

  • representing constituents and undertaking casework

  • making decisions on quasi‑judicial or regulatory applications as a member of a regulatory, licensing, planning or appeals and appointments committee.

If a decision involves purely operational or administrative issues, with expenditure within existing budgets, it will usually be made by an officer without reference to elected members. Some decisions may include both operational and strategic elements. In such cases, officers may consult certain elected members (such as the Leader or Deputy Leader, committee chairs, or ward members) to ensure that they have appropriate engagement before making the decision.

Responding to a press enquiry on behalf of the Council will normally be a matter for officers, although they may consult certain elected members if, for example, a quote is required.

While elected members may be on appointments committees that recruit and appoint senior officers, this does not mean they have any day‑to‑day line management responsibilities or a role in instructing or carrying out the work of senior officers.

4.3  Gifts and hospitality

A hand is raised to refuse a blank card being offered by another hand in a wooded outdoor setting.

 

The Code’s provisions on gifts and hospitality are designed to avoid any perception that councillors are using their role to obtain benefits that members of the public would have to pay for. They also help prevent councillors being influenced into making decisions for reasons other than the public interest (for example, by individuals or groups seeking contracts or licences).

The Code makes the default position clear: you should refuse all offers of gifts and hospitality except in the limited circumstances set out in paragraph 3.15. Acceptance includes accepting the promise of a gift or hospitality.

The exceptions under paragraph 3.15 are:

  1. Minor items or tokens of modest intrinsic value offered on an infrequent basis (such as a pen or a notepad).
  2. A civic gift offered to the Council.
  3. Hospitality reasonably associated with your duties as a councillor (for example, tea or coffee at a local event, or a buffet lunch provided at a training event or conference).
  4. Hospitality approved in advance by the Council.
(adapted from Scottish Government, 2021, p. 9)

To determine whether an offer falls within these exceptions you must apply the objective test: whether a member of the public, with knowledge of the relevant facts, would reasonably consider that acceptance of the gift or hospitality might influence your discussion or decision-making.

You should always question whether the gift or hospitality would have been offered to you if you were not a councillor. You should consider not only your own perception but also the perception of others.

The Code recognises that you may reasonably accept hospitality associated with representing your Council in a civic role, such as a dinner to commemorate an anniversary of a local event. It also recognises that you may be expected to accept gifts on the Council’s behalf, particularly where refusal could cause offence. In such cases, you must accept the gift on behalf of the Council and pass it to the appropriate officer.

You are required to advise your Council’s Monitoring Officer promptly if you are offered, but refuse, any gift or hospitality of significant value, or if you receive repeated offers from the same source. This enables the Council to monitor the situation and take any appropriate action.

The Standards Commission’s Advice Note for Councillors on Gifts and Hospitality includes detailed information and examples of typical scenarios to help councillors reach fair, transparent decisions about what gifts and hospitality should be accepted or declined.

4.4  Casework

People working around a laptop at a meeting table with legal and real-estate symbols, including a gavel, scales of justice, documents and model houses.

 

As a councillor, you have a role in representing the electorate at a ward level. In doing so, you may be expected to undertake casework on behalf of individual constituents and are allowed to campaign on local issues.

When asked for assistance, you should manage the constituent’s expectations about the extent to which you can help. For example, you should advise them that you can seek information on their behalf, but you cannot overturn a decision and they must follow the appropriate procedures for doing so. You cannot insist on a particular outcome. You should also advise constituents that you cannot seek legal advice from the Council on their behalf or pass on any legal advice provided to the Council either by an officer or an external firm.

You should not pursue casework that is likely to come before you at a quasi‑judicial or regulatory committee because this may prevent you from taking part in the discussion and voting.

To avoid becoming inappropriately involved in operational matters and to prevent conflicts arising, consider exactly what you are being asked to do. There should be no difficulty if you have managed your constituent’s expectations appropriately and are simply:

  • advising officers of representations received

  • helping constituents make their views known to the appropriate officer, or advising them about who to contact and the correct procedure

  • assisting a group of constituents with community engagement

  • seeking factual information on progress on behalf of a constituent.

4.5  Courtesy and respect

Wooden peg figure with a sad face standing apart from a blurred group of similar figures against a light blue background.

 

Section 3 of the Code also covers your general conduct. The Code requires you to treat colleagues, council officers and the public with courtesy and respect at all times, even if you disagree with their views. This applies in person, in writing, at meetings and when you are online, including when using social media. The Code also requires you to respect and comply with rulings from the chair or convener during council meetings, committee meetings or meetings of any outside body to which you are appointed by the Council.

While you are entitled to express your views and disagree with others, you must do so in a respectful way. It is usually better to focus on the issue itself rather than making personal comments about an individual.

If you make a comment in the heat of the moment that you do not mean and subsequently regret, you should consider retracting it and apologising. Bear in mind, however, that comments made on social media may have circulated widely by the time you seek to retract them or apologise.

You are expected to advance equality of opportunity and to seek to foster good relations between different people. You must not express views that indicate a discriminatory attitude towards people on the basis of race, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender reassignment, disability, religion or belief, marital status, or pregnancy/maternity.

The Code notes that bullying and harassment are completely unacceptable and will be considered a breach of the Code. It notes that bullying and harassment can be:

  • a.a one‑off incident

  • b.part of a cumulative course of conduct

  • c.a pattern of behaviour

  • d.physical, verbal or non‑verbal conduct.

The Code also notes that it is the impact of the behaviour, not the intent, that is key.

It should be noted that the Code does not require you to respond to all correspondence, phone calls or enquiries from members of the public or constituents. In some cases, it may be better to refrain from responding.

4.6  Social media

Grid of social media app icons on a smartphone screen, including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Pinterest, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, TikTok and Threads.

 

Due to the public nature of social media, and your profile as a local authority member, members of the public may automatically assume that you are commenting in your capacity as an elected politician in anything you post, publish or share online. As such, it is likely that the Code will apply to your conduct.

When deciding if an account is truly private, consider your followers and why they follow you. If any are unknown to you or include organisations such as your political party, it is likely they follow you as a councillor. The Code may still apply even if you rename an account for campaigning purposes (for example, from ‘@CllrX’ to ‘XforYTown’) while keeping the same content and followers.

The conduct expected of you in a digital medium is no different from the conduct expected in other forms of communication, such as face‑to‑face meetings and letters. Before commenting or posting, you should ask yourself whether:

  • you understand the immediate and permanent nature of any comment or post you are about to make, and that you will have no control over the extent to which it is shared and by whom
  • you would make that comment or post in person, face-to-face
  • you have such conviction in what you are about to share that you would be prepared to justify it if challenged at a later date
  • you fully understand that even if you delete your post, it may have been captured in a screenshot or otherwise retained, including through automatic online caching, and that fully deleting content once shared online is almost impossible.

You should always consider whether you need to respond to a comment made about you or posted on your page, and whether it is appropriate or helpful to do so. Sometimes people will say unpleasant things for the sake of it and people in public life can be singled out for unwarranted abuse. You are entitled to engage with members of the public online and correct false information. However, if someone is being abusive, offensive or sarcastic, you should consider whether there is any value in engaging.

The Standards Commission has produced an Advice Note for Councillors on the Use of Social Media.

Activity 4  Social media conduct

Timing: Allow around 5 minutes

A former councillor has posted false, rude and disparaging comments about you on Facebook. A constituent, who has seen these, posts a comment demanding that you respond. Another constituent posts a comment supporting you.

What can you do?

  • Respond immediately with a strongly worded rebuttal so that people know the truth.

Answer

You may choose to post information correcting false accusations but you should avoid getting drawn into an exchange of personal insults. A strongly worded rebuttal risks breaching the Code if it becomes disrespectful or abusive.

  • Take your time to consider whether it would be helpful to react at all.

Answer

You can correct statements and explain why they are incorrect, but you may wish to consider whether responding would draw further attention to the comments or escalate the situation.

  • Respond to the first constituent, explaining why the comments are false and outlining your thoughts about the former councillor.

Answer

The Code does not require you to respond to the constituent. It is your choice whether to reply. You may wish to take advice about whether, and how, to respond. Any reply must be polite and factual. You could risk breaching the Code if you are disrespectful towards the constituent or about the former councillor.

  • Repost the constituent’s supportive comment to show you have public backing.

Answer

You could choose to do this, but you should be careful. Reposting the comment may be perceived as endorsing not only that comment, but also any other views the constituent has expressed on their account.

By signing in and enrolling on this course you can view and complete all activities within the course, track your progress in My OpenLearn Create. and when you have completed a course, you can download and print a free Statement of Participation - which you can use to demonstrate your learning.

4.7  Relations with council officers

Two people outdoors shaking hands on a pathway, with one holding a blue clipboard. Grass and modern buildings are visible in the background.

 

The Code states that you must not undermine any individual officer or group of officers, or raise concerns about their performance, conduct or capability in public. As a councillor you are entitled to scrutinise the effective delivery of services. You should be careful, however, not to make public statements that expressly or by implication criticise the actions or inaction of an identifiable individual officer or group of officers (including where individuals in that group are, or could be, identifiable).

You should note that the concept of a public statement is wide. It can include the published minutes of a meeting, a comment on social media, or remarks overheard in a public area such as a corridor or tearoom. Mutual respect and courtesy between councillors and those who work for, or on behalf of, your Council is essential, as this helps to ensure that local government runs efficiently and effectively.

The Code further provides that you must not take, or seek to take, unfair advantage of your position as a councillor in your dealings with officers. You should be mindful that you hold a position of inherent power and influence over officers, particularly more junior officers who may not be used to dealing directly with elected members.

The Code also provides that you must not bring undue influence to bear on officers to take a particular action. You must not ask or direct an officer to do something that you know, or should reasonably know, could compromise them or prevent them from undertaking their duties properly.

You have a right to receive good-quality information from officers on which to base your decisions and undertake your scrutiny role. If you believe that you are not receiving the information you need to make an informed decision, you should raise this with an appropriate senior officer, such as the relevant Head of Service. You should note, however, that although you may ask officers for information, this does not mean you have a right to receive it, or you can demand that it be provided. When seeking information, you must do so in a courteous and respectful manner.

The Improvement Service and Standards Commission have produced a joint Briefing Note on Right of Access to Information Held by the Council.

Activity 5  Relations with council officers

Timing: Allow around 15 minutes

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is a.

Discussion

You have a right to high-quality information and to scrutinise the report and proposal. There is no reason why you cannot challenge the adequacy of the report and its conclusions. You are entitled to seek further information and propose that further assessment of risk is undertaken. You cannot, however, demand that the contents of the report or its recommendations are changed.

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is a.

Discussion

You can challenge the report and raise concerns about the extent of the risk assessment but you should take care not to do so in a personal or offensive manner. You should consider both what you are expressing and how you are expressing it, including how your conduct may be perceived. You should be able to undertake a scrutiny role, represent the public and any constituents or stakeholders, and make a political point in a respectful, courteous and appropriate manner, without resorting to personal attacks or being offensive, abusive or unduly disruptive.

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is b.

Discussion

You cannot criticise the conduct, performance or capability of an identifiable officer in public, including the report’s author. If you have concerns, you should raise them privately with the officer’s line manager or a senior officer, as appropriate.

You should be aware of the potential impact of what you say at a meeting, especially if the officer concerned is not senior. For example, it would be more helpful to say:

  • ‘I consider there is insufficient information to enable me to consider the risks fully. Can more analysis be provided?’

Rather than:

  • ‘This report is rubbish! You obviously have no idea how to analyse risk.’

a. 

Yes


b. 

No


The correct answer is b.

Discussion

When providing feedback you should be mindful of the requirement to avoid inappropriate involvement in operational matters. Persistent or voluminous emails should be avoided, as should emails with a directive tone. Regardless of any previous experience you may have, you cannot take part in preparing any assessment unless officers expressly invite you to do so.

a. 

Encourage them to raise concerns about the officer’s conduct at the meeting so that the issue is addressed publicly.


b. 

Suggest they meet privately with the officer or Chief Executive before the meeting to discuss their concerns.


c. 

Advise them to highlight the problem by making a robust public statement criticising the officer’s failure to consult.


d. 

Tell them to refuse to engage with officers until the decision is reversed.


The correct answer is b.

Discussion

You should consider the following:

  • Whether your colleague has sought information about how and why the decision was taken. Councillors have a right to good-quality information to support their scrutiny role.
  • While you have responsibilities to your constituents, you are also a member of the Council and must act in its interests as a whole.
  • When and how any concerns are raised. If you or your colleague has concerns about an officer’s conduct or performance, these should be raised privately with their line manager or the Chief Executive.
  • Whether the decision is operational in nature. If it was made within the Scheme of Delegation and in line with relevant policies and procedures, criticising the officer’s conduct may be unfair. In such cases, concerns may be better directed towards the underlying policies or strategies.
  • How your actions could be perceived, including their potential impact on the officer. You must avoid behaviour that could reasonably be viewed as disrespectful or as harassment, discrimination, victimisation or bullying. If so, you risk breaching the Code.
By signing in and enrolling on this course you can view and complete all activities within the course, track your progress in My OpenLearn Create. and when you have completed a course, you can download and print a free Statement of Participation - which you can use to demonstrate your learning.

4.8  Distinguishing between strategic and operational matters

The Code states that you should not become inappropriately involved in the operational management of the Council’s services.

The Standards Commission has produced:

When considering your involvement, think about whether the matter concerns your ward. If it relates to an operational matter in another ward and concerns a matter that you have no specific remit over or interest in, your involvement is likely to be inappropriate. If you repeatedly contact officers about an operational matter, you may be perceived as being directive or becoming inappropriately involved.

You have a right to receive good-quality information from officers to support your scrutiny role. However, you only have a right to information that is reasonably necessary to enable you to perform your duties properly. This is known as the ‘need to know’ principle. For more information, see the Briefing Note on Right of Access to Information Held by the Council.

You should not become involved in any individual staffing matter except when serving on a committee, such as a Personnel Appeals Committee, that is tasked with dealing with the specific matter. Having made a decision on an individual staffing matter when serving on a committee, you must not take part in any follow‑up work.

Examples of inappropriate involvement in operational matters

 

You should avoid:

  • requiring that the contents of a report or its recommendations are changed

  • seeking to sign off a press release on behalf of the Council

  • becoming involved in an individual staffing matter (unless serving on a committee specifically tasked to deal with such matters)

  • attending an operational meeting with an outside body or an internal officer working group where elected members are not normally present

  • seeking access to confidential internal audit reports

  • negotiating directly with trade unions

  • seeking to approve or amend an operational plan

  • becoming involved in setting or monitoring individual key performance indicators under a contract.

 

Activity 6  Managing expectations

Timing: Allow around 5 minutes

A constituent approaches you for help with some aspects of his social care. He tells you he has been discriminated against and ignored. You want to assist him as much as possible. He asks you to email the officers responsible for his case to request a meeting.

What should you do?

a. 

True


b. 

False


The correct answer is a.

a. 

True


b. 

False


The correct answer is b.

a. 

True


b. 

False


The correct answer is b.

Discussion

You should manage the constituent’s expectations by advising that you can seek information on his behalf, in accordance with your Council’s procedures, but you cannot overturn a decision. You may contact officers to note that the constituent is seeking a meeting, but you must not insist that they agree to this. It may be that his concerns have already been investigated and addressed. If not, you may advise the constituent about how to access the Council’s formal complaints process.

When contacting officers, you must not assume the constituent has been ignored or discriminated against, or that decisions have not been made in accordance with appropriate policies and procedures. It may be that he is simply unhappy with the outcome.

You should remember that you may be perceived as holding a position of power over officers, particularly more junior staff. They may feel pressured into taking a particular action or prioritising this matter over their other duties.

Now move onto Conclusion.