So far, in this part of the Module, you have learnt many important topics concerning HIV and AIDS. This study session gives you the opportunity to learn about another aspect of this condition, which is especially important to you in your work as a Health Extension Practitioner. In particular, you will learn about:
You need to learn about infection prevention because the procedures to be described are very important for your daily work in the health post, and in the community at large. In particular, the guidance we give here will mean that you are unlikely to become infected with HIV and other blood-borne infectious agents through occupational exposure during your work as a Health Extension Practitioner.
When you have studied this session, you should be able to:
26.1 Define and use correctly all of the key words printed in bold. (SAQs 2.1 and 26.3)
26.2 Describe the basic principles and standard procedures of universal precautions to prevent exposure and transmission of blood-borne infectious agents. (SAQ 26.1)
26.3 Describe the standard procedures for giving safe injections to prevent occupational exposure to infectious agents. (SAQ 26.2)
26.4 Explain the principles of post-exposure prophylaxis. (SAQ 26.3)
26.5 Assess the risks of HIV infection following accidental occupational exposures. (SAQ 26.4)
26.6 Describe the measures that should be taken when a healthcare worker suffers a needle-stick injury. (SAQ 26.4)
26.7 Explain how you would refer someone who has been raped for post-exposure HIV prophylaxis. (SAQ 26.5)
The term universal precautions (UP) refers to the standards of infection control developed to prevent exposure and transmission of blood-borne infectious agents like HIV and hepatitis virus. In some texts you will find them referred to as ‘standard procedures’, because they should be routine in all contacts with patients. The universal precautions that are described here should be implemented and practised at all times by all healthcare providers and caregivers in all settings, in particular in hospitals, health centres, health posts and community settings, as well as in the homes of your patients.
Standard procedures is the term used in Part 2 of this Module in the prevention of occupational exposure to tuberculosis.
Universal precautions were developed because it is not possible to identify all patients with blood-borne diseases caused by microorganisms. With many of the patients you are looking after, there is no risk of HIV transmission. So, it is not appropriate to routinely test every health worker or patient for HIV. However, increased risks are faced by healthcare workers when providing care to HIV-positive patients, or those infected with other blood-borne agents such as the hepatitis virus. It was in response to such concerns that UPs were developed — the term ‘universal’ reflects the fact that they are intended to refer to contact with all patients, not just those known to have blood-borne infections.
UPs are designed to provide for the safe handling of infectious material, including amniotic fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, abdominal fluid, serum, semen, vaginal fluids, blood and blood-tainted body fluids. As part of this process, barriers to infection were developed, such as gloves, gowns, masks and eye goggles to protect health workers from splashes or sprinkles of infectious materials. The procedures summarised below are designed to keep all healthcare workers safe, and to protect the public against infectious waste material that could pose a risk to them. Safety involves not just patient contact, but the management of the environment in which the patient is situated. Note that, with universal precautions, everyone is considered infectious, since it is impossible to tell ahead of time who is infected and who is not.
Universal precautions include the following measures and actions:
Never fill a safety box beyond three-quarters full. Beyond this point you risk an injury when adding more sharps to the box!
A common source of injury for healthcare workers is poor practise when giving injections. This section shows the standard procedures for giving an injection, designed to ensure your safety and that of your patient when giving injections in the health post and in the patient’s home.
Using a new sterile syringe and needle for each injection is one of the most effective ways to prevent the spread of blood-borne infections.
A needle-stick injury refers to a healthcare worker accidentally puncturing their own skin with a needle that has previously been used to inject a patient. Needle-stick injuries can occur at any time, but they happen most frequently during and immediately after an injection is given. They can also occur when needles are not disposed of in safety boxes, for example when a healthcare worker picks up contaminated waste in which a needle has been left unnoticed.
In general, the more injection equipment that is handled, the greater the risk of needle-stick injuries. But these injuries are preventable. Box 26.1 lists the simple steps you can follow to reduce the risk of needle-stick injuries.
Although you should not recap needles routinely, you may need to recap a needle to avoid carrying an unprotected sharp when immediate disposal is not possible, or if an injection is delayed because a child is agitated. If it does become necessary for you to recap a used needle, follow the one-handed recapping technique (also called the single-handed scoop method) illustrated in Figure 26.5.
The most effective (and cheapest) way to deal with exposure to disease-causing agents is prevention, so the implementation of universal precautions, with appropriate training and monitoring should be your immediate priority. However, although universal precautions will decrease the occurrence of occupational exposure, ‘accidents’ and unanticipated exposures will sometimes occur, and it is essential to know how to deal with them.
Chemoprophylaxis means using drugs to prevent a disease from developing in the first place. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV means taking antiretroviral medication (ARVs were described in Study Session 22) as soon as possible after a possible occupational exposure to HIV, so that the exposure will be less likely to result in HIV infection. PEP is also provided after rape to prevent possible HIV transmission. Due to the psychosocial impact of HIV/AIDS, and the fact that the disease is not curable, PEP for HIV is made freely available in Ethiopia.
Note that you cannot prescribe ARVs for PEP. You must refer such cases to health centres providing ARVs as a matter of urgency.
What does occupational exposure mean?
Occupational exposure means coming in contact with infectious agents whilst carrying out your duties as a healthcare worker.
Examples of occupational exposure to HIV are needle-stick or other sharps injuries, a splash of infected body fluid into the eyes or onto cracked skin, bites and sexual assaults by infected patients. Procedures such as gynaecological examinations, spinal taps, labour and delivery, and surgery can also place the healthworker at risk. Splash exposure carries a lower risk than a needle-stick injury, but it should be taken seriously in both the workplace and the patient’s home.
For healthcare workers, PEP usually relates to exposure to HIV or hepatitis virus, but we will only deal with HIV exposure here. (Note: you learnt about hepatitis B in Study Session 4.) The risk of transmission of HIV after accidental occupational exposure is about 100 times less than the risk of occupational transmission of the hepatitis B virus.
Transmission of HIV is estimated to occur in about 1 in 300 cases of occupational exposure. The factors that increase the risk of transmission of HIV after an occupational exposure are if:
Hollow bore needles are used as intravenous (IV) needles or canullae, or to give drug injections. Solid needles are those used in suturing wounds.
From the above list, can you identify circumstances in which the risk of HIV transmission after an occupational exposure will be reduced, relative to these higher-risk criteria?
The risk will be lower if the exposure is onto mucus membranes, not deeply penetrating, or involves body fluids other than blood; and also:
The following measures should be taken immediately after an accidental occupational exposure to a possible source of HIV infection.
Wash the wound from a needle-stick or other sharps injury with soap and water, and let it bleed freely. The wound should be irrigated (flushed) with sterile saline and a disinfectant. Exposure to mucosal membranes (e.g. broken skin, mouth, eyes) should be dealt with by washing the affected area thoroughly with clean water, sterile saline or sterile eye irrigant from an eye-wash bottle.
The level of risk will depend on the type of injury as described in Section 26.3.1 above.
If the HIV status is unknown, a rapid HIV test should be performed on the individual or patient who is the source of the exposure, after counselling and consent has been secured. If the source is found to be HIV negative, there is no need for further assessment of the exposed healthcare worker. If the result is positive, the healthcare worker needs to be HIV tested.
A rapid HIV test should be performed on the healthcare worker immediately after exposure. If the result shows that the healthcare worker is already HIV positive PEP cannot help them. If the test is negative then the healthcare worker should be administered PEP as described below. The HIV test should be repeated at six weeks, three months, and six months after exposure. If, as a consequence of these repeat tests, the healthcare worker is found to have become HIV positive, then they will be assessed for HIV care and treatment.
Following exposure to HIV, there is a need for psychosocial support and counselling on safer sexual practises. If ARVs are prescribed, close monitoring will need to follow to support adherence and identify any adverse side-effects of treatment (as described in Study Sessions 22 and 23).
Why should the HIV test be repeated at intervals up to six months after the exposure?
It takes up to three months before the body of a person newly infected with HIV produces enough anti-HIV antibodies to be detectable in an HIV rapid test. This is called the ‘window period’. A negative test result during this period cannot be taken as evidence that the exposure did not transmit HIV.
You must refer yourself, or any health worker you witness suffering a sharps injury from a contaminated instrument, or a splash exposure to their mucus membranes, as quickly as possible to an appropriate health facility.
If you suffer an occupational exposure to blood or body fluids from any patient, you should seek PEP immediately, even before the HIV status of the source is known. To be effective, PEP has to be started as soon as possible, ideally within one to two hours after exposure. It is not worth undertaking PEP beyond 72 hours after the exposure, because by this time, if the virus has been transmitted, it will have entered the person’s bloodstream. PEP cannot prevent it from circulating around the body and possibly causing HIV infection. A standard course of PEP will normally last for 28 days. It can be provided only by trained nurses, health officers or physicians at health facilities offering antiretroviral therapy (ART). Most of the health centres and hospitals offer PEP services.
Rape is a major crime that could happen in your community, and you need to be prepared to support the victims, both in terms of their mental health and their physical health. Cases are treated according to the Ethiopian law for rape management, and anyone who suffers a rape or other penetrating sexual assault should be referred for post-exposure prophylaxis in case the rapist was infected with a blood-borne disease such as HIV or hepatitis. Since police procedures may take time, you have to urge the raped person, and whoever is caring for them, to go immediately to a health centre or hospital that provides PEP. Currently, all ART sites provide this service, as should most of the health centres in your catchment area.
Anyone who has been raped should be counselled by the examining healthcare worker about the potential risks of HIV infection (Figure 26.6). Under these circumstances, the HIV status of the rapist should be considered as ‘unknown’, and therefore HIV transmission is a potential risk. Parents or guardians of traumatised children or adolescents should also be counselled and informed about the risk of HIV infection after a sexual assault.
Points to be covered in counselling after a rape include:
PEP is not recommended if the person presents to a health facility later than 72 hours after the sexual assault. They should be counselled about the possible risk of infection, and the possibility of transmitting infection to another person during the window period. They should be told to return after six weeks and three months for further HIV testing and counselling.
Why is PEP not recommended if a person presents to a health facility more than 72 hours after a sexual assault?
Because by this time the virus has entered the bloodstream, and PEP given more than 72 hours after exposure is not effective. Ideally, PEP has to be started within one to two hours after exposure. If this is not possible, it should be started within the first 72 hours.
A person who undergoes PEP after a sexual assault should be carefully evaluated for psychosocial support and monitored for any adverse side-effects of PEP treatment. They should also be screened for other sexually transmitted infections and referred for treatment as appropriate.
In Study Session 26, you have learned that:
Now that you have completed this study session, you can assess how well you have achieved its Learning Outcomes by answering the following questions. Write your answers in your Study Diary and discuss them with your Tutor at the next Study Support Meeting. You can check your answers with the Notes on the Self-Assessment Questions at the end of this Module.
State if the following statement is true or false. Explain your reasoning.
‘Universal precautions are used only with very sick patients.’
The statement is false because universal precautions are standard procedures used when we manage all patients. Universal precautions should be implemented and practised by all healthcare providers and caregivers in all settings, in particular in hospitals, health centres, health posts and community settings, as well as the homes of your patients.
Which of the following statements about the standard procedures for giving safe injections is false? In each case, explain what is incorrect.
A The more you handle an injection instrument, the more skilful you will become at avoiding the risk of needle-stick injury.
B Place a safety box close to the person giving injections, so used syringes and needles can be disposed of immediately.
C Do not manually remove a used needle from the syringe.
D Do not carry used syringes and needles around with you.
E Avoid recapping the needle after you have given an injection.
F Close the safety box when it is full, and start a new one.
A is false. The more you handle an injection instrument, the more likely you are to suffer a needle-stick injury.
B is true. Place a safety box close to the person giving injections, so used syringes and needles can be disposed of immediately.
C is true. Do not manually remove a used needle from the syringe.
D is true. Do not carry used syringes and needles around with you.
E is true. Avoid recapping the needle after you have given an injection.
F is false. Safety boxes should be closed when they are three-quarters full; you risk a sharps injury if you try to add needles or other instruments to a full safety box.
State if the following statement is true or false. Explain your reasoning.
‘If a health facility has all the personal protective equipment (PPE), the healthcare workers in that facility do not need a post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) service.’
The statement is false. Remember that although universal precautions will decrease the occurrence of occupational exposure, there are ‘accidents’ and unanticipated exposures, which necessitate PEP for HIV. Even if a health facility has all the PPE, it needs a PEP service for its healthcare workers to prevent HIV transmission through accidental occupational exposure. If PEP is not available in a health facility, or when there is nobody trained in how to manage such cases, referral of the exposed health worker to a nearby health facility which has a PEP service should be arranged as soon as possible.
Read Case Study 26.1, and then answer the questions that follow.
Ayelech is a healthcare worker trained to provide a safe and clean delivery service (this is covered in the Labour and Delivery Care Module). One day she was attending a delivery in a household in her catchment area. The mother had been sick for about two months before the delivery with diarrhoea on and off, but she had persistently refused Ayelech’s counselling to be tested for HIV. Ayelech didn’t use any personal protection equipment for the delivery except gloves. After the delivery, she injected the mother with intramuscular (IM) oxytocin to help deliver the placenta and prevent excessive bleeding. Ayelech was trying to recap the needle with two hands, when she accidentally pricked her left index finger with the needle. Her finger was bleeding and it was a deep needle-stick injury, but the placenta was coming and the baby needed attention, so she ignored the injury.
Read Case Study 26.2, and then answer the questions that follow.
While working in your health post, Fatuma, a 15 year-old girl, arrives with her parents. They have brought her because six hours earlier she was raped by a man whose HIV status is not known.