What influences children’s play decisions and creative choices, and how do they show their preferences and have their voice heard through their play? In this course, you will explore children’s play and creativity in a range of different situations, and consider what influences their play decisions and creative choices. You’ll think about children as active learners and participants, fully capable of constructing and communicating their perspectives on their experiences (Mardell and Carpenter, 2012). When children have freedom to choose, they are highly self-motivated and ‘active’ in their engagements with everything around them. You are asked to put yourself in ‘young children’s shoes’, listening to what they think, noting their responses and taking their perspectives seriously.
In Section 1, you are briefly introduced to two studies where researchers wanted to listen to young children’s talk and opinions about their play. In Sections 2 and 3, you are encouraged to think about children’s play experiences in different contexts. First, you will read about Elodie (aged three years) and how she plays at home as observed by Mia, her mother. You will then read an account by Michael, the father of William (five years) and Megan (three years), both of whom are being home-educated. Finally, Section 4 focuses on children’s street play. The street was a place that children once fairly freely occupied and adapted for play in various spontaneous and imaginative ways. Today, of course, streets are, in the main, claimed by moving and parked vehicles. This section includes some memories from adults reflecting on their childhood days spent playing in their streets.
This course is an adapted extract from the Open University course E110 Young children’s play and creativity.
After studying this course, you should be able to:
understand and outline the significance of play and creativity in listening to children and understanding their perspectives
describe different ways that children ‘tell’ about their experiences of play in different contexts
describe the impact of different contexts on children’s views of play
recognise how a socio-cultural understanding of children leads to taking their perspectives seriously.

In this section you will consider two pieces of research that sought to find out what children think about play and their playing. The first piece of research is from the United States and involved the research team interviewing children aged from 3–10 years about their views on play. The second research study looks at children’s social play experiences, following seven 4-year-old children from England.
Based in Oakland, California, USA, Julie Nicholson and her colleagues interviewed 98 school pupils (most between the ages of three and ten, but some were teenagers) about their perspectives on both children’s and adults’ play. The majority of these children were living in economically distressed urban environments. The impetus for the research arose from a wish to listen to the voices of children, given that most published writing about children’s play reflects adults’ perspectives on children’s play, rather than children’s views.
Describing what play meant for her, seven-year-old Angelica seems to capture something essential not just for herself but adults too; she stated, ‘Play is having fun for the rest of your life.’ And four-year-old Yenee commented, ‘Play means you have to play from some house with toys or peoples.’

The researchers found that children often associated play with toys and games and saw play to be very much part of their social interactions and relationships with other children. Laughing and having fun featured strongly, as did being able to choose how they played and what they played with.
Many of the older children interviewed also expressed clear ideas about how adults might play. According to a number of children, the primary form of adult play was adults playing with their own children. One child, Jose (aged nine), felt he had to encourage his mother to play with him. Others recognised that adults might play sports and games of their own kind – cards, soccer, or a game on their phone. Neela (aged eleven), widened things by saying:
I think they play with their friends ... not exactly the same way we play ... their play probably is talking, going to lunch maybe, going shopping, um, at night-times, going to people’s houses, eating, talking about grownup stuff.
These seem to be astute suggestions, coming from a young person, about the possibility of play in an adult’s world. It could be argued that playful thinking is visible in a design such as that of the ‘Gherkin’ skyscraper in London, designed by Norman Foster and Ken Shuttleworth and later nicknamed the ‘Gherkin’ because of its unique shape.

Nicholson et al. (2014, p. 150) concluded that many children had ‘profound comments to make about why play was important to their own lives’. Through their study, the researchers came to believe that children can in fact cause adults to stop and think, to pause in their busy lives, and to reconsider their personal beliefs and actions that can affect their children’s lives. Listening to children in order to better understand their perspectives on play and playing, the researchers urge, is an essential dimension of respecting children’s human rights to be heard and for their opinions to be respected (United Nations, 1989). The Italian philosopher and founder of Reggio Emilia nurseries, Loris Malaguzzi, reminds us in his poem, ‘No way. The hundred is there’, that children are born ‘with a hundred languages’ (Gandini, 1998). Even before they are talking, babies are subtly communicating their feelings, perspectives and ideas about the world with those nearest to them, and, of course, it can be a challenge for adults to learn how to respond to the pre-linguistic sounds and expressions of babies.
As you read the different accounts of children’s perspectives on play in the following sections, reflect on these and think about the various ways in which children share their views.
Natalie Canning’s doctoral study looked in detail at the child-initiated play of seven children (four boys and three girls, aged four years old), all of whom were living in central England and attending a range of early years settings. Her case studies of the children included video recordings of the children’s social play in their early years settings and in their homes, conversations with the children and interviews with practitioners and parents. Her central research question was: In what ways can child-initiated social play empower children? The video and interview data were examined under three themes:
Canning (2015) noted, in her video data, that there never seemed to be a moment when children ran out of ideas for play. For example, the children creatively thought of den-making in the woods, rolling a large pipe in a field, sliding down a pole and establishing a running circuit in a garden.
In addition to her own observations and discussions with parents, Canning (2015) sought to understand how the seven children regarded their play: she asked them about their likes and dislikes about play, and supported this with still photographs printed from the video footage of them playing. In their responses, the word ‘fun’ was often used, confirming a long-recognised essential play ingredient for children and, indeed, for adults too. In early years settings (and schools), the art of making things fun for children would seem to be central to stimulating their interest and involvement in learning. Although seemingly obvious to many, this probably cannot be said too often.
Canning (2015) acknowledges that, with such young children, it is not easy to elicit their thoughts and comments about play. However, it was important that she endeavoured to do this in her research design, thus showing the children the respect they deserve as people. She concludes that by using video recordings to observe and re-observe children at play, practitioners can gain a deeper understanding of children’s play and how they are empowered through different play situations.
In the video in the following activity, you will hear Donna explain why play is important in the forest school. After viewing the video, think about the experiences the children have in the forest and how those experiences enhance their learning and development. In the video you will see children mark-making on the ground with sticks. Take particular notice of what the children are doing, as this will form part of the next activity.
By the time you have completed this activity, you should be able to:
Watch the short video below, showing a group of children playing in the forest school, and listen to Donna explain why play is so important for children.

[CHILDREN TALKING]
| 1. | |
|---|---|
| 2. | |
| 3. |
In this relatively short video, there is quite a lot happening: you can see children engaging in different experiences with different natural materials found in the forest. This engagement and playing, exploring and experimenting supports children’s learning and development. Donna focuses on the gross and fine motor skills that children are practising; however, the social aspect of the play and the way in which the children are communicating is equally important. From a child’s perspective, they will remember having fun and the excitement of experiencing the freedom of the space for the first time. It is the adult that places significance on what the children are gaining from the experience.
Keep in your mind the way children were playing in the forest school and now watch the video of Grace and her friend painting in a more structured, indoor environment. The children are demonstrating similar skills in both videos, but are very different.
By the time you have completed this activity, you should be able to:
Watch the short video clip of Grace and her friend painting in a more structured, indoor environment.

| The similarities are … | |
| The differences are … |
In the two videos, you watched children mark-making, but in very different ways. The children in the forest school were using large sticks in the mud on the forest floor, whereas Grace and her friend were mark-making using paint in a more structured situation. The children in both the videos are practising the same skills through play, but having very different experiences. This key observation highlights the need to allow children to have multiple opportunities to play in different contexts or situations so that they can experience new ways of doing things. This experience will help them to develop their preferences on where they enjoy playing and what they like to do in that play environment. Arguably the children in the forest school had more choices about what they could do within the forest space, although Grace and her friend looked happy to be painting and were focused on what they were doing. From the children’s perspective, they were exploring and testing out what they could do, for example Grace mixing the colours of the paint. In both videos the children were experimenting with the resources they had available to them.
The following account is from Mia Jenkins, Elodie’s (aged three years) mother. She talks about what Elodie likes to do, what she chooses to play with and her interest in music.
When Elodie wakes up in the morning, she immediately wants to play rather than have breakfast. She’s always so excited about playing but a little unfocused because she can move from one thing to another very quickly. Perhaps this is because she was a premature baby, being ten and half weeks early, so she needs time to develop. Her doll’s house is a massive thing with her and so is music. At the moment, at age three, from what I gather from our health visitor and various books, she should sometimes be playing in slightly different ways – games where it’s your-turn, my-turn like, for example, snap and snake and ladders.
But she often just wants to play her musical instruments. She’s got a guitar, just a little one, and she’s also got access to my guitar. She loves her toy piano and she loves all her percussion things. So she’s either working on her music or she is singing, or she is playing making me tea and breakfast in her little play kitchen. She is an only child and she wants to play with me all the time so I’m trying to stretch her gradually so she will play on her own a little more.
If we are playing in her doll’s house, she likes it if I also have my hands in the doll’s house getting the furniture out and so on. I do make suggestions but they can get over-ridden and when I mention breakfast or lunch, she’ll say ‘No, it’s night time’. She likes me around to make suggestions but she needs to take control. I don’t mind this because I like to think it’s good that she’s imagining something. She’s definitely got her own agenda on the play.
Up to a year or so into her life, I wasn’t quite sure how to play with her. Before she was born, I’d not had very much experience of playing with small children. I think I learned how to play with Elodie from watching my mother. She appeared to know how to do it; she’s wonderful. It seems to be about bringing imagination into what’s happening. A stick, of course, can be so many things in play. The role now comes more naturally to me. In fact, I think Elodie has reminded me how to play. I did use to have a very good imagination when I was a child.
When she was little I sang to her all the time. Even when she was in an incubator in hospital I sang to her. When she was crying and upset I would sing to help calm her. So she’s heard music a lot. She was very late to talk, late to do everything, in fact. Her language has only really taken off in the past few months. Previously to that, she wasn’t forming many words but she could sing the melodies of countless songs – maybe 30 well-known nursery songs.
Since 10 months she’s been a very good sleeper but she wouldn’t be quick to go to sleep. She would just lie in her cot and, on the monitor downstairs, we could hear that she wasn’t sleeping for perhaps an hour after we put her to bed, but she was going through one song after another. At first the tunes were perfect then the words started to come. Some of the words she hasn’t quite got yet so she makes up her own. I think singing is a form of playing. She’s entertaining herself, comforting herself, soothing herself …
Mia comments that from conversations with her health visitor and other parents and books she has read that, at three years, Elodie should be playing in more sophisticated ways – for example, in turn-taking games. As a parent, Mia would be aware that these expectations are based on UK developmental frameworks for monitoring a child’s development of significant skills and milestones. How useful is it to have such idealised developmental expectations for the play of young children? Mia seems to acknowledge the uniqueness of her daughter’s acquisition of skills and, rather than focus on what Elodie is not yet demonstrating in her play (sometimes referred to as taking ‘a deficit view’), describes her preference for music and love of playing her instruments. The danger of strictly applying developmental norms is that parents and professionals can become overly concerned as to what children cannot do, rather than noting and praising what they can do at any point in time.
Mia records how Elodie likes her to participate when she’s playing in her doll’s house. Elodie wants her mother to make suggestions, but, you will have noticed, Mia recognises that Elodie also has ‘her own agenda on the play’ and ‘needs to take control’. If children are regarded as active learners, the seeking of ownership by Elodie is not surprising, of course. Participating in activities with others, engaging in conversations and sharing in play with roles are key concepts in sociocultural theories of play and learning. Barbara Rogoff (2003, p. 287) refers to such mutual learning and meaning-making as a part of the process of ‘guided participation’ through which children learn as they participate with others.
There is a sense in which all music-making and participation involves aspects of exploration, experimentation, trial and error and, as Mia suggests, play. For example, think of a composer working on a new manuscript or musicians working together to create an original composition. From what Mia tells us, Elodie seems to be enjoying the textual, rhythmic and melodic features of the songs she is getting to know. Small (1998) referred to such spontaneous musical-making as ‘musicking’ (from the verb to music). Before she slips into sleep, Elodie plays with the melodies, rhythms and the words known to her in her own creative way. Many of the early pioneers of early childhood education (including Froebel and Montessori) recognise the value of music and musical activities for young children (Rowe, 2012).
In the next section, you will read about William and Megan’s experiences – for this family, the home and the local environment are contexts where playing and learning seem to be inextricably linked.
From the two videos you watched in Activities 1 and 2, you will have formed an opinion about the children’s play and their creative experiences from that play. It is important to understand the difference between facts, opinions or arguments. The next activity will help you to distinguish between them and think about how you can use them effectively.
Facts can be checked against evidence. Facts used in academic writing are those that have been gathered and recorded in a formal way, such as part of a research study published in a journal or official records or statistics. For example:
Many of the early pioneers of early childhood education recognise the value of music and musical activities for young children.
This is a fact because the early pioneers did recognise the value of music and this has been extensively written about.
Opinions are personal beliefs. They are not always based on good evidence and, in some cases, may even be the opposite to what evidence suggests. Even if most people agree with what you are saying, it is still an opinion unless you can back it up with supporting evidence. For example, Elodie’s Mother, Mia, offers her opinion on what Elodie likes to play with:
She loves her toy piano and she loves all her percussion things. So she’s either working on her music or she is singing, or she is playing making me tea and breakfast in her little play kitchen.
How does Mia know that Elodie loves her toy piano? Or her percussion things? What evidence is there to support her claim? It is just Mia’s opinion from watching her daughter play because there is no evidence to support what she is saying. It is good to have opinions, but in academic study opinions must be backed up with a fact or an argument.
Arguments are reasons, which can include facts, given to support a point of view. For example:
Participating in activities with others, engaging in conversations and sharing in play with roles are key concepts in sociocultural theories of play and learning. Barbara Rogoff (2003, p. 287) refers to such mutual learning and meaning-making as a part of the process of ‘guided participation’ through which children learn as they participate with others.
Here the research by Rogoff (2003) is being used to back up what the author wants to say. It is an informed argument because an opinion (first sentence) is supported by published research which agrees with the point being made (second sentence).
By the time you have completed this activity, you should be able to:
From the paragraph below, decide whether each sentence is a fact, opinion or argument:
There is a sense in which all music-making and participation involves aspects of exploration, experimentation, trial and error and, as Mia suggests, play. For example, think of a composer working on a new manuscript or musicians working together to create an original composition. From what Mia tells us, Elodie seems to be enjoying the textual, rhythmic and melodic features of the songs she is getting to know. Small (1998) referred to such spontaneous musical-making as ‘musicking’ (from the verb to music). Before she slips into sleep, Elodie plays with the melodies, rhythms and the words known to her in her own creative way. Many of the early pioneers of early childhood education (including Froebel and Montessori) recognise the value of music and musical activities for young children.
Write your answer in the table below.
| Sentences from paragraph | Fact, opinion, argument? |
|---|---|
| There is a sense in which all music-making and participation involves aspects of exploration, experimentation, trial and error and, as Mia suggests, play. | |
| For example, think of a composer working on a new manuscript or musicians working together to create an original composition. | |
| From what Mia tells us, Elodie seems to be enjoying the textual, rhythmic and melodic features of the songs she is getting to know. | |
| Small (1998) referred to such spontaneous musical-making as ‘musicking’ (from the verb to music). | |
| Before she slips into sleep, Elodie plays with the melodies, rhythms and the words known to her in her own creative way. | |
| Many of the early pioneers of early childhood education (including Froebel and Montessori) recognise the value of music and musical activities for young children (Rowe, 2012). |
| Sentences from paragraph | Fact, opinion, argument? |
|---|---|
| There is a sense in which all music-making and participation involves aspects of exploration, experimentation, trial and error and, as Mia suggests, play. | Opinion |
| For example, think of a composer working on a new manuscript or musicians working together to create an original composition. | Argument |
| From what Mia tells us, Elodie seems to be enjoying the textual, rhythmic and melodic features of the songs she is getting to know. | Opinion |
| Small (1998) referred to such spontaneous musical-making as ‘musicking’ (from the verb to music). | Argument |
| Before she slips into sleep, Elodie plays with the melodies, rhythms and the words known to her in her own creative way. | Opinion |
| Many of the early pioneers of early childhood education (including Froebel and Montessori) recognise the value of music and musical activities for young children (Rowe, 2012). | Fact |
As you can see there is a balance between opinions, arguments and facts in the paragraph. There are many ideas about play and creativity, and you may well have come across very different opinions and perspectives as a result of your own study of the subject. One of the best ways to identify what your values and beliefs are about children’s play is to listen to children and take their thoughts and actions seriously. They communicate their ideas and responses in different ways, as you have learnt in this course. Listening to children, and thinking about the choices and decisions they make in their play, will help you to form your own responses to children’s motivation for play and creative experiences.
Parents who home-educate their children in England are under no obligation to inform their local council, so the numbers of parents who decide to do this are not known. However, there is reason to think (see BBC News, 2015) that this total number may be increasing because of parental dissatisfaction with, for instance, the formal nature of schools, an inability of schools to meet the special needs that their children have, bullying between children, and the wish to pass on family and community religious beliefs in more concerted ways than might be done in schools.
Michael is the father of William (six years old) and Megan (three years old). As you read the following account of how he is home-educating his two children, focus on how the children’s views are accommodated each day and Michael’s reflections on his approach.
I haven’t gone back to work since William’s been about two so I’ve kind-of forgotten what it’s like to have a whole day to myself. With home education you really are around all the time with the children. I don’t think it’s nearly as hard as people might imagine it to be. The way we do home education is for them to play – that’s all they do really. Most of the time they’re exploring their ideas through play. It’s about communication, conversation and trying something out – experiments with ice, progressing their ideas for games, or examining stick insects, for instance.
We meet up with other parents and children all the time. William and Megan play very differently when we’re out with other children. William does have a tendency to run off with the older boys and they’ll do their own thing. A lot of Megan’s contemporaries aren’t that interested in group play. Sometimes she finds a little friend to play with. There are a couple of forest groups that we go to and it depends on who’s there as to how it unfolds.* We sometimes meet up in a forest and sometimes on a heath. The groups can be quite large when the weather’s good. We link up through social media but it’s also steered by word of mouth. When you’re starting out, you look at the big wide world of home education but then choose whatever works for you. Some parents initiate groups and activities. I tend to join groups rather than lead them. We may have ideas for activities but we often go with what the children want to do.
There’s quite an age gap between William and Megan so between them they tend to find a common denominator in their play, and they do play together quite well. When we’re in the house together, they’re often into their small world play characters. There’s a big castle and a doll’s house set up. Megan’s characters are living in the doll’s house and William’s are in the castle – true to their gender stereotypes. At first, Megan was immersed in William’s world of tractors and so on but she’s more into her own interests now like dressing up as a princess. I just let this happen because you’ve got a job on your hands to prevent it.
For a lot of the time today they were drawing little characters and cutting them out for their play. They were very productive and the characters were all over the table. Megan’s figurative drawing is coming along quite nicely. As soon as they draw them they act them out and move on to the next game. When they’re drawing it’s very verbal and their imagined people don’t seem to have much of a lifespan. With their small world play characters, they use them as a vehicle for their little adventures. They themselves also get dressed up. So, sometimes they project characters onto their toys and sometimes onto themselves. I used to have a role where I might get things going and they would then go with them. It’s less so these days because they’re sort of self-starting.
My background as a photographer, video engineer and someone who’s interested in science means I have always been an explorer and a life learner. I finished my science degree with The Open University when I was first looking after William. I just try to encourage them to be interested in the world around them and when you’ve got small children who are curious about everything, that’s not a difficult job. With our stick insects they used hand lenses to distinguish between what was poo and what were eggs. In their minds, this was fun and play. I don’t think children make the kind of distinctions between say play, fun, and exploration that adults can make.
There are some children who receive a very formal home education and they respond to it. The parents plan it out each term and tailor it to their child. Some home educators are teachers, of course. I expect the outcomes are very good. There is one child I know who is reading quite well at four. What’s nice about home education is you have the flexibility to do what you’re comfortable with. I do think I lean towards a holistic approach to learning.
* Note: a ‘forest’ approach offers children opportunities to achieve and develop confidence through hands-on learning in a natural environment.
As Michael states in his account, some parents lean more towards a school-based formal home curriculum and some, like him and others he links with, approach it in more informal ways. So, the extent to which play as a way of learning might feature in home education varies considerably across families. Michael comments: ‘…I lean towards a holistic approach to learning’. Broadly speaking a holistic approach involves acknowledging that children do not compartmentalize their play experiences (Duffy, 2010). The informal curriculum Megan and William experience is situated in their home and community and based directly on their interests and concerns. If parents are prepared to listen to their children while carrying out home education, children will, of their own accord, introduce play into their home learning. Of course, the same conclusion can be drawn for practitioners in early years settings.
A way of appreciating how playing might seem from a child’s perspective is to write what Paige-Smith and Rix (2011) term a ‘first-person narrative’. This involves carefully observing a child at play, imaging you are thinking like the observed child, and then constructing short sentences that reflect what they are doing. The grandfather of Megan and William wrote this short example below during a day when his wife and he looked after both children.
I (Megan) get the fuzzy felt box off the shelf. I open the box. I put the board on the floor. I bend over the board. I put a starfish from the tray on the board. I put two fish next to each other. I pat down the fish to stick to the board. I put eyes on the starfish. I add another fish to the two on the board. I say to Granny ‘They’re having a party’. I get up from the floor and climb on the settee.
Writing a first-person narrative is a method of carefully observing children and recording what they do when they are playing. The observation (and the construction of a short text about what is observed) takes place over a relatively short time – perhaps 5 minutes at the most. It can provide insights into the fine details of children’s play and, therefore, help adults to better appreciate what is involved when children are playing. Those who have tried this method invariably report that they are surprised at how much is happening over a few minutes – in terms of children’s actions and interactions when a child is engaged in play. Of course, the text created is an adult-constructed text which does not truly reflect what a child might write were they able to write about what they are doing. This observational technique, arising from research on young children (Paige-Smith and Rix, 2011), could be of use in early years settings. You may like to try it out in your home or your professional setting.
It was in 1908 that the Ford Model T went into mass production and greatly increased the number of cars on roads. During 1922 to 1933, over 12,000 children in England and Wales died as a result of being involved in motor vehicle accidents and over 300,000 were seriously injured (Hansard, 1938). This resulted in Nancy Astor, the first female Member of Parliament, expressing concern in 1926 about the increasing dangers for children who sought to play, as children had long done, close to their homes and in neighbourhood streets. During the twentieth century (and in recent times with the wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton in 2011), royal events unwittingly served to reclaim streets for community parties and children’s play, albeit for short periods.
In an attempt to respond to these issues, the Department of Health in England is promoting street play, not least because there is growing concern about children’s physical inactivity and the rising levels of child obesity. Funds have been made available to enable local authorities across the country to work with communities in order to develop ‘play streets’, especially in areas of high deprivation. From a young child’s perspective, walking and running with some freedom is impulsive and playing outside must be seen as a natural thing to do. One only has to think about a two-year-old’s reluctance to hold a parent’s hand on leaving the safety of home. A child may not welcome such adult constraints, but the dangers presented by moving cars need to be learnt.
In Brooke Road, Waltham Forest, London, a group of parents have worked with the local authority to set up a play street for two hours on the first Sunday of each month (see London Play, 2015). The appointed street stewards display traffic cones and temporary signs to alert any unwitting driver. This means the road is closed to through traffic for a given period, allowing children to play outside safely. A Brooke Road reminiscence event was attended by a number of adults who wished to share their childhood memories of playing in streets. One resident, Keith, remembered how, when the road became very wet due to periodic flooding, he and others would have fun in the water together. Delia recalled playing skipping games in the street using two ropes which were swung faster and faster. The skipper would run in and out of the swinging ropes, while children chanted: ‘Salt, pepper, mustard, vinegar’.
Reminiscences of this kind contribute to an oral history of children’s past play, helps adults to understand a child’s perspective on playing and reminds us about the places where spontaneous play and imagining was once much more possible. The loss of streets as safe spaces to play is regrettable, but adults and children, of course, also benefit from cars. The family car might be used to support play interests when children are transported to a swimming pool or an adventure playground, for instance. Herein lies a dilemma as progress can often bring both advantages and disadvantages for people.
Evaluations of play streets have highlighted the potential benefits of providing children with increased opportunities for outside play, including:
Wider benefits include:
Throughout this course you have been asked to think about your own understanding, values and beliefs about children’s play and creativity. In this final activity, you have the opportunity to consolidate your thinking by listening to the views and personal positions of two people working in the field of early childhood.
By the time you have completed this activity, you should be able to:
Watch the video of the nursery in central London and listen to Sarah’s personal position about the importance of play and how she defends it through what happens in her early childhood setting.

Now watch the video of Morag talking about her views on ‘purposeful play’. Morag is the head teacher of a primary school in Fife, Scotland, so, as you would expect, her personal position is mindful of children’s learning and development.

Relate Sarah and Morag’s views to the questions in the grid. The questions are based on what Sarah and Morag say when they are talking about the significance of play and creativity.
| Questions | Sarah’s position | Morag’s position |
|---|---|---|
| What emotions do you feel when hearing Sarah’s and Morag’s responses about the significance of play to them and to the children and families they support? | ||
| How are Sarah’s and Morag’s responses represented in the brief glimpse you have of their settings? | ||
| What impression do you have of the ability of Sarah and Morag to talk about and share their positions on play? | ||
| How do you think their position has been informed by literature, theory or ‘expert opinion’ to inform their understanding and knowledge? |
Putting yourself in someone else’s shoes to consider their position or perspective on something is indeed a skill. You have to forget what you would do, think or say, and consider where the other person is coming from. The ability to do this relies on having an open mind and a non-judgemental approach. This is not easy, especially when you find yourself facing challenges to long-held opinions about children’s play and creativity. Perhaps you can use your responses to the questions about the videos as starting points for reflection on your personal position and see whether this leads you to bring about changes to the way you approach supporting young children’s play and creativity.
In this course, you have been encouraged to think about children’s perspectives on play and how these might differ from, or even support, what adults think play is. The two accounts from parents, Mia and Michael, give emphasis to the ways in which children can use play, notably in spontaneous and intuitive ways, to engage with, enjoy and learn about what is around them. In terms of research, however small or informal the study, there is a need for more enquiries into what young children themselves think about play and why they are compelled to play. It isn’t easy for adults to tap into the views of very young children. However, we hope that this course will be the beginning of your own explorations as you seek to better support young children, listening to them, respecting their voices and taking their views seriously.
This course is an adapted extract from the Open University course E110 Young children’s play and creativity.
This course was written by Roger Hancock, Gill Goodliff and Natalie Canning.
Except for third party materials and otherwise stated (see terms and conditions), this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence.
The material acknowledged below is Proprietary and used under licence (not subject to Creative Commons Licence). Grateful acknowledgement is made to the following sources for permission to reproduce material in this course:
Course image: Two boys playing with a hose, Copyright © 2016 The Open University
Figure 1: © Umoja Turner / iStockphoto.com
Figure 3: © dynasoar / iStockphoto.com
Figure 6: © Nick Yapp / Stringer / Getty Images
Every effort has been made to contact copyright owners. If any have been inadvertently overlooked, the publishers will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at the first opportunity.
Don't miss out
If reading this text has inspired you to learn more, you may be interested in joining the millions of people who discover our free learning resources and qualifications by visiting The Open University.