Although the term resilience is now widely used in media reports and discussions about mental health, ongoing debates continue to examine what the term really means.
The term is often used to describe an individual’s capacity to endure stressful conditions and to bounce back from challenging situations and circumstances. Some academics, psychologists and psychiatrists have spent their careers trying to understand resilience, and they continue to debate its essence. Whilst they may differ in their definitions of what resilience means, they share a commitment to its value, especially in relation to supporting robust mental health. In this session, you will explore these debates around the meaning of resilience and how resilience can be nurtured in young people.
One thing there is some agreement about is that resilience, much like a muscle or a set of skills, can be learnt and developed, but it takes practice. First, you will hear from some young people who have shown resilience through coping with adversity. As you work through the session, you’ll refer back to this from time to time.
This video provides insights into young people’s views about resilience and what it means to them.

By the end of the session, you should be able to:
define resilience and describe its features
identify and engage with the debates around resilience
outline what schools, families and certain communities can do to promote resilience in adolescents
discuss the features of adversity that can require a young person to be resilient.
A growing body of research suggests that learning the skills to cope with everyday challenges during childhood and adolescence can reduce the likelihood of developing stress-related illnesses such as depression and addiction in later life (Cooper, Montgomery and Sheehy, 2018).
Developing resilient behaviours to endure and adapt to stressful life experiences are clearly important life skills. Yet there are clear differences in how young people react to stressful situations. This leads many parents and practitioners to question why some young people appear more able to bounce back from life’s challenges and show fewer signs of anxiety than other young people. Even young people raised within the same family can demonstrate startling differences in how they react to and cope with stressful events. In the first activity, you will reflect on these issues.
Spend a few minutes thinking back to a time when a young person that you know needed to respond to challenging circumstances. Do you think the young person demonstrated resilience? What was it about their response that made you think that? Jot down your thoughts here:
If you thought their response was resilient, perhaps you noticed how the young person seemed to come through relatively unscathed, bounced-back quickly or perhaps appeared wiser in some way. If the response was not resilient, perhaps you noticed them struggling over a long period or not adjusting well to new circumstances. These are just a few suggestions, and there are many other observations you could have made.
Now that you have started thinking about what resilience might look like, you’ll study definitions of resilience next.
As you saw in the introductory video each of the young people described resilience in a different way. This reflects the academic perspective of this concept in that there are no standard definitions of resilience. While there have been attempts to quantify and measure it, most studies look at the concept qualitatively – as one group of researchers argued, ‘Rather like beauty, resilience may be said to lie in the eye of the beholder.’(Gilligan et al.,2014, p.1.).
Existing definitions of resilience have similar components, which involve doing well ‘against the odds’, coping, and recovering (Rutter, 1985; Stein, 2005).
The next activity will help you to untangle some of the technical language in these definitions.
Re-read the three definitions given above and then have a go at highlighting some terms below.
Definition statements are usually focused and condensed pieces of text. You may have wanted to highlight a large number of the terms.
This activity is designed to help you notice some of the variations between the definitions. Is resilience ‘successful adaptation’ as stated in statement 1 or is it ‘withstanding the negative effects of adversity’ as suggested by statement 2? (You’ll explore meanings of adversity in the next section).
In the first statement the word ‘adaptation’ gives a sense of learning and changing in response to experiences. While in the second statement the word ‘withstand’ portrays more of a focus on survival. In the third statement ‘reduced vulnerability’ appears to recognise resilience as a protective factor, and the word ‘overcoming’ draws our attention to the challenges and having a good outcome.
You can also discern a contrast between the idea of resilience being a process (statement 1) as well as being a quality in a person.
When deciding if a young person is showing resilience, be aware that what might appear to be coping or resilient behaviour may be nothing of the sort. A young person developing anorexia might appear to be coping well if they are handing in their homework on time at school and seemingly getting on well with friends. As social workers Brigid Daniel and her colleagues note, ‘some young people who appear to be resilient may in fact be internalising their symptoms’ and while they may appear to cope in the short term are actually suffering greatly (Daniel, Wassell and Gilligan, 2010, p 70). When practitioners refer to ‘internalising symptoms’, they mean that a person may be developing anxiety or depression and becoming withdrawn, rather than giving out more open signs of distress such as aggression or impulsiveness, or dramatically falling behind at school. It is therefore important to consider all aspects of a young person’s behaviour when reflecting upon whether they might be struggling with something.
By now, you have probably realised that the concept of resilience is far from clear cut. But how far would you consider that resilience is embedded in an individual? The next activity asks you to decide.
Study the quote in Figure 3 from the National Scientific Centre on the Developing Child and consider what you think it means. Do you agree with it? Vote whether you agree or disagree, using the poll below.
The National Scientific Centre declaration drew upon academic research showing that one important reason why young people can overcome adversity is having one stable and committed caregiver or adult. It is suggested these relationships provide scaffolding that helps to buffer the effects of the adversity and help young people to adapt to changing circumstances.
Before looking further at resilience, it will help to consider next what people understand by the term ‘adversity’.
Adversity is commonly defined as ‘a difficult or unlucky situation or event’ (Cambridge Dictionary, 2020). In the world of resilience research, however, adversity is expressed more strongly, as traumatic and potentially harmful events or situations. Among children and young people, resilience shows itself most markedly in being able to cope with adverse situations such as living with drug-using or alcohol-dependent parents, severe traumas such as abuse, or the death of a close relative or friend that results in the loss of security and support.
Parental divorce and a long-standing illness in a parent or caregiver are unfortunately relatively common sources of adversity. You may remember in session 2 one of the young men we interviewed mentioned his parents separating as a source of distress. According to the UK Office for National Statistics (2015), in 2014, lone parents with dependent children accounted for 25% of all families that have dependent children in them. Additionally, researchers Payler, Cooper and Bennett (2020), estimated that parent or caregiver illness could affect approximately 20% of young people aged 11-17. These situations can bring additional burdens and caring responsibilities for these young people.
Adversity can also stem from the wider socioeconomic environment, for example, neighbourhood violence, terror or war, natural disasters, pandemics and poverty (Masten and Barnes, 2018). Multiple negative life events and adverse circumstances often expressed as ACEs (Adverse Childhood Experiences) are currently a focus of concern due to their effect on wellbeing and on future health, and a growing body of research is examining how experiences during childhood and adolescence can affect health later in life (Hughes et al., 2017).
The recent COVID-19 pandemic has introduced adversity into the lives of many young people. Sources of difficulty have included health and money concerns, abrupt changes in daily routines with school closures and families confined to their homes, and a contraction of the usual support networks (Casebourne, 2020). However, research is also showing that there have been some positives. In the next activity, you’ll hear some young people talking about their experience of life during the pandemic.
There are two slightly paradoxical ways of looking at the relationship between resilience and adversity. One way is to accept that people develop resilience through successfully coping with challenges. Another way is to recognise that people can be rendered less resilient through adverse experience and circumstances that have made them more vulnerable. Young people who are rendered more vulnerable through adversity are more likely to experience anxiety or depression, exhibit behaviours which many may define as ‘disruptive’ and, in some cases, turn to substance use (Hughes et al.,2017, Oldehinkel and Ormel, 2015). Later on, you will explore how these two scenarios can happen.
In the next section, you’ll consider an example of disruptive behaviour, which can be a sign of living with adversity.
Adversity can refer to a variety of different life experiences and can impact children and young people in different ways.
Living with a family health crisis is one example of adversity which can be a very lonely, isolating and exceptionally stressful experience for young people. The next activity introduces you to Amy, whose mother developed multiple sclerosis when Amy was 10-years-old. Looking back as a 20-year-old, Amy felt that her unmet need for support had resulted in her behaving in ways that others judged as disruptive behaviour. She found the caring responsibilities, school, and the uncertainty surrounding her mother’s ill health very challenging, and she left school to be home educated at 13 years old.
Mental health practitioners need to determine how a young person’s social environment may be affecting their health, while being aware of how this might interact with physical and mental developmental changes in adolescence. As you will appreciate, exploring the social environment can be very complex and covers sensitive territory, not least because parents and other caregivers may blame themselves when their child faces challenges to their mental health, and can feel threatened by perceived stigma of other people towards their children.
According to a recent review of the research on the effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health (Hughes et al., 2017), adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are most strongly associated with sexual risk-taking, mental ill health, self-harm, problematic alcohol or drug use and violent behaviour later on in the child’s life. These are associations, meaning that although there is a link between ACEs and subsequent poor mental and physical health, this is not to say that ACEs will cause poor health in later life and it is important to note that there is no clear evidence of a cause and effect relationship. Poor health is not an inevitable outcome of ACEs. Supporting resilience in young people who experience adversity can be the key to preventing the harmful consequences of adversity.
Next, you’ll consider what makes young people resilient.
Not all children and young people will be affected by the effects of adversity, which begs the question: what are the protective factors, and what enables some young people to be resilient? The common assumption is that resilience arises from dynamic interactions between genetic predisposition and a person’s life experience. From the mid-20th century, academics, psychologists and psychiatrists have been studying resilience in young people, identifying innate protective factors, for example optimism and creativity, combined with external protective factors, chiefly the support they receive from those who care for them (Richardson, 2002). Neuroscience has opened a window on what happens in the brain in adversity and in the development of resilience. You’ll look at this next.
Scientists have developed some understanding about what happens in the brain when people are exposed to stressful situations, and about how the adolescent brain differs from the adult brain. Combining this scientific knowledge can help deepen understanding about resilience in young people and demonstrate how good social support can influence changes in the brain via neuroplasticity.
In session 2, you found that in adolescence the prefrontal cortex is undergoing significant change. This area of the brain is used for the ‘executive functions’ of planning, inhibiting inappropriate behaviour, understanding other people and social awareness. During adolescence, the prefrontal cortex is being re-shaped and ‘pruned’. At the same time the limbic system, which is responsible for emotion, is exceptionally active (Blakemore, 2019). Combined, these changes can make young people particularly sensitive to adversity because the prefrontal cortex becomes temporarily less able to interpret and moderate the emotional responses of the limbic system.
The brain pruning and reshaping described above are aspects of neuroplasticity that significantly (but not exclusively) take place during adolescence. In addition, the nerve pathways formed during early childhood and adolescence show neuroplasticity by changing in response to an individual’s experiences in life (Schauss et al., 2019). Brain activity is highly influenced by social interactions and the wider social environment, whether for better or worse. There is some evidence that adverse experiences can impair development of the prefrontal cortex in young people (Hunter, Gray and McEwen, 2018). On the positive side, neuroscience suggests that supportive social interaction can lead to beneficial brain adaptations and enable a young person to learn resilient behaviours.
Figure 6 demonstrates how potential negative outcomes for a young person can be ‘tipped’ into positive outcomes by the protective factors of ‘warm supportive parenting’, ‘coping skills’, a ‘stable environment’ and ‘positive experiences’. Remember that negative outcomes from adverse experiences are not inevitable.
Whatever the social environment, anyone caring for a young person will realise that young people bring their own personal characteristics to any situation. Some individual differences can be attributed to their inherited genes. There is clearly an interaction between ‘nature’, which is genetically determined, and ‘nurture’, which encompasses experience. In the next activity, you’ll learn about a simple but effective analogy for thinking about how interaction between a young person’s genes and the environment can affect the brain.
Watch the brief video explaining the dynamic relationship between the developing brain, a person’s genes, and the environment. What is the role of genes, the environment and learning in this process? Write your notes in the table provided.
| Genes | Environment | Learning (i.e. brain changes) |
|---|---|---|
Here’s an example of notes on the video:
| Genes | Environment | Learning (i.e. brain changes) |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Research in genetics can help to explain some differences between young people,indicating that a young person’s sensitivity to environmental challenges has genetic origins. For example, Boyce and Ellis (2005) suggested that genetic makeup predisposes how sensitive young people are to the stresses they experience during childhood. Albert et al. (2015) reported a specific gene variant among children who appear highly sensitive to their environments and are particularly vulnerable to stress. These genes are linked to chemical receptors in the brain, which in combination with family stress can lead to social and emotional problems later in life.
Studies in neuroscience and genetics strengthen our understanding of the links between the brain, resilience and mental health. However, there is much more research to be done before we can fully explain how these effects interact and neuroscientists are keen to acknowledge the important part played by experiences and influences within the environment. The next section explores further how resilience can be fostered in young people who may have become vulnerable through adversity.
In recent years, the dominant approach to the promotion of young people’s mental and emotional wellbeing has been to seek ways of developing resilience and promoting the protective factors that might reduce young people’s vulnerability to mental health problems. An example of how these factors are applied in policy can be seen in the work of sociologist Simone Fullagar who examined policy responses to the high rates of suicide among young people in rural areas of Australia. Fullagar reported that policy focused on identifying risk factors such as previous suicide attempts, mental health problems and social isolation, and on promoting protective factors such as social connectedness, problem-solving skills, and readily available mental health services was valuable in supporting young people (Fullagar, 2005, p. 32).
The family therapist and professor of social work Michael Ungar and colleagues (2013) argues that it is important to not just focus on the child or young person and how they can be supported to develop resilience but also on how society can be changed to nurture and foster resilience and remove challenges and barriers that make some children and young people more vulnerable to adversity.
In the next activity, you’ll focus on protective factors and consider whether you could apply this knowledge to a young person you know.
Step 2: Using the polling tool, vote for your favourite of the seven Cs, not just because it speaks most to you, but because it shows where you could develop your own competence as a parent or caregiving adult.
Resilient responses to all kinds of challenge can be of immense benefit to the young person and those close to them. Resilience in young people is achievable through everyday-sounding requirements such as:
‘a healthy human brain in good working order; close relationships with competent caring adults; committed families; effective schools and communities; opportunities to succeed; and beliefs in the self, nurtured by positive interactions with the world’ (Masten 2015, p.8).
Although it is difficult to imagine such all-round perfection, it can be comforting to know that resilience is not a mysterious quality that either people have or don’t have; resilience can be nurtured.
Next you consider how resilience can be fostered in schools.
Schools are increasingly seen as major players in creating resilient young people. This was the subject of a detailed report in England, ‘Local action on health inequalities: Building children and young people’s resilience in schools’ (Public Health England, 2014), which explored the different ways that schools could contribute.
The report considered three levels of resilience support:
Individual:
Interpersonal:
School and community
Note that this report deliberately did not separate out young people’s mental health from their physical health but considered that resilience relates to the whole of a young person’s wellbeing.
The next activity shows you how a secondary school in Brighton has supported its pupils to develop their resilience.
Step 1: Watch Video 5.

Step 2: Now match the examples of resilience support with one of the levels mentioned in the Public Health England report: ‘individual’, ‘interpersonal’ or ‘School and community’.
The skills of sorting activities into a category can offer a useful way of making sense of situations and applying logical thinking. It is often the case when considering human behaviour, however, that some things can overlap categories. The student leadership programme, for example, probably fits most closely with the ‘individual’ category, but you could easily argue that is it supporting interpersonal relationships. Ideally, you’d want to include it in both categories.
The school featured in the video clearly had robust systems in place to foster resilience. If you would like to see the whole video for further study, use this link.
Even the most resilient young person can become overwhelmed by the effects of poverty and health challenges, and even the most optimistic adolescent can be deeply affected by an acrimonious parental divorce. Cooper and Rixon (2017) argue that resilience is not static, and there are positive (‘protective’) and negative (‘adverse’) factors that can enhance or undermine it. Many young people do show great resilience in the face of difficulty but this should not be used as an excuse to blame those who do not cope with stress or adversity or to believe that if only they had the ‘right’ psychological or genetic qualities they could cope as well as their resilient peers.
Check what you’ve learned this session by taking the end-of-session quiz.
Open the quiz in a new window or tab then come back here when you’ve finished.
The main learning points of this session are:
Resilience can be defined in a variety of ways, although at its heart is a sense of doing well ‘against the odds’, coping, and recovering. Resilience is important in helping young people to cope with difficult life challenges or more serious threats to their wellbeing and learning how to be resilient is a key life skill.
Adversity can create a resilient response, but it can also render a young person more vulnerable to the knocks in life. Multiple sources of adversity can overwhelm a young person’s resilience resources and sometime adversity can lead to disruptive behaviours.
Brain and neuroscience studies have identified how the brain adapts in response to experience. Different parts of the brain, especially those that are involved in stress responses, are changed by both adversity and environmental protective factors. Genetic make-up, although it may predispose a person to greater or lower resilience, does not mean they cannot adapt and become more resilient.
Schools have an important role to play in fostering the resilience of young people.
Now to go Session 6.
This course was written by Victoria Cooper, Sharon Mallon and Anthea Wilson and was published December 2021. We would also to thank Jennifer Colloby, Steven Harrison and Karen Horsley for their key contributions and critical reading of this course. We would like to thank the parents, young people and professionals who shared their experiences with us.Their willingness to share sensitive and highly personal accounts of having or supporting those with mental health challenges adds greatly to this course and we will hope will benefit all those who find themselves in similar situation.
Except for third party materials and otherwise stated (see terms and conditions), this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence.
The material acknowledged below (and within the course) is Proprietary and used under licence (not subject to Creative Commons Licence). Grateful acknowledgement is made to the following sources for permission to reproduce material in this course:
Session 5: Understanding resilience in adolescence
Figures
Figure 1: serato/Shutterstock.com
Figure 2: artwork: Courtesy ©WILHELMINA PERAGINE
Figure 3: Monstera/Pexels
Figure 4: OrnaW / 682 images/https://pixabay.com/ photos/ corona-coronavirus-mask-protection-4970836/
Figure 5: John Birdsall https://www.johnbirdsall.co.uk/
Figure 6: adapted by The Open University https://www.parentingforbrain.com/ resilience/
Figure 7: from:Local action on health inequalities: Building children and young people’s resilience in schools PHE publications gateway number: 2014334September 2014© Crown copyright 2014. Open Government Licence (nationalarchives.gov.uk)
Audio/Video
Video 1: What Does Resilience Mean To Young People? courtesy: YoungMinds https://www.youngminds.org.uk/
Video 2: Reflections: ©The Open University
Video 4: The Seven Cs of Resilience: Dr. Ken Ginsburg
Content provided courtesy of the Center for Parent and Teen Communication, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. © 2018 The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. All rights reserved.
Video 5: Courtesy: Young Minds https://www.youngminds.org.uk/ from https://www.youtube.com/ watch?app=desktop&v=Dfl9uX6MCzY&feature=youtu.be
Every effort has been made to contact copyright owners. If any have been inadvertently overlooked, the publishers will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at the first opportunity.
Don’t miss out
If reading this text has inspired you to learn more, you may be interested in joining the millions of people who discover our free learning resources and qualifications by visiting The Open University – The Open University.