Comparing and contrasting are good activities to make people aware of mathematical properties and its applications. The action of comparing and contrasting forces students to think about the properties of the mathematical objects and to notice what is the same and what is different. While doing so, students make connections they might not normally consider. They are prompted into mathematical thinking processes such as generalising, conjecturing about what stays the same and what can change, and verifying these conjectures. This is an example of the national curriculum requirement of letting students use abstractions to perceive relationships, see structures, reason things out and argue the truth or falsity of statements.
Compare and contrast activities, such as in Activity 1, can help students to:
Activity 1 requires your students to think about which statements are always, sometimes or never true. The aim is to become aware of differences between the number systems and to develop a mathematical argument for their reasoning. By doing so, they become more precise in their use of mathematical language and notice the more subtle similarities and differences. In the later questions there is a first step towards visualisation by referring to a number line.
Before attempting to use the activities in this unit with your students, it would be a good idea to complete all (or at least part) of the activities yourself. It would be even better if you could try them out with a colleague, as that will help you when you reflect on the experience. Trying the activities yourself will mean that you get insights into a learner’s experiences that can in turn influence your teaching and your experiences as a teacher. When you are ready, use the activities with your students. After the lesson, think about the way that the activity went and the learning that happened. This will help you to develop a more learner-focused teaching environment.
The statements can be offered as a list, or can be written on cards and shared out randomly. A fuller list of questions, and an example of a worksheet that can be cut up as cards, can be found in Resources 2 and 3. An overview of different number systems and their properties can be found in Resource 4.
Here are some suggestions for ways of working on this activity:
Ask your students which of the following statements are ‘always true’, ‘sometimes true’ or ‘never true’, and why?
You may also want to have a look at the key resource ‘Talk for learning’.
This is the account of a teacher who tried Activity 1 with his secondary students.
I was a bit scared about trying out this activity for several reasons:
Before we started on this activity, I asked six students for a number between one and 14. These six numbers became the questions they had to do. I was very uncomfortable about allowing the students to talk to each other as I thought it would become very noisy with 79 students in the classroom; I would not be able to control what was discussed and it could become chaotic. What if the principal happened to walk past at such chaotic moment! On the other hand I do believe that talking helps learning, because when you talk, you have to organise your thinking – otherwise the listener will not understand you.
So I pushed myself to be brave and started the lesson: I asked the students to work the answers out for themselves in silence and to write down their reasoning. Then I asked them to discuss their thoughts and reasoning with their classmates, in pairs. But they had to do it quietly, so the others could not overhear what they were saying and steal their ideas! I told them that after some time I would select at random someone to explain what the thinking of the pair had been. Other students could then comment in a constructive way, just like we sometimes do in whole-class discussions. To address my fear that they would not be able to remember anything, I wrote the page numbers of their textbook where they could find information about the number systems on the blackboard – and they were free to refer to these.
To my surprise it worked really well! The classroom did not end in chaos. There was noise from the talking in pairs, but it was not loud: they seemed to like the sense of competition and secrecy. I listened into the conversations by walking around and by standing quietly against the wall, observing. What I liked very much was that the conversations were about mathematics, and that disagreements led to pointed discussions about the mathematical properties, flicking through the textbook to check their reasoning and using a number line to illustrate what they were saying. The whole class discussion was less lively than I had anticipated because there was little disagreement by then. However, I was impressed with the quality of the mathematical language used. The class discussion thus became a consolidation activity. Their responses showed me they seemed to really understand the differences in properties, and the consequences of these differences when doing operations in the different number systems.
What I found very hard in this lesson was my changed role as teacher: I was no longer standing at the front explaining and telling them what to do. Actually, I talked very little, and it was difficult not to interfere in the discussion and show them how to do it. However, it meant that this was now their learning and their thinking, which was a powerful experience.
Would I change anything next time? Yes, I think I would try to let them choose their own questions, although I am not sure how to lead the whole-class discussion then as they might have chosen all different ones. Perhaps I could ask them to prepare small presentations on their findings. I think I will also prepare the questions in ‘card’ format and use these when we have five or ten minutes left over at the end of a lesson. I think that could offer the repetition needed to keep all this knowledge in the mind, without it meaning doing more exercises from the book.
When you do such an activity with your class, reflect afterwards about what went well and what went less well. Consider the questions that led to the students being interested and being able to progress and where you needed to clarify. Such reflection always helps with finding a ‘script’ that helps you engage the students to find mathematics interesting and enjoyable. If they do not understand and cannot do something, they are less likely to become involved. Use this reflective exercise every time you undertake the activities, noting, as Mrs Aparajeeta did, some quite small things that made a difference.
![]() Pause for thought Good questions to trigger such reflection are:
|
OpenLearn - Visualising, comparing and contrasting: number systems Except for third party materials and otherwise, this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence, full copyright detail can be found in the acknowledgements section. Please see full copyright statement for details.