9.2 AMR indicators

AMR indicators are metrics used to track and assess the prevalence and/or control of AMR. The choice of AMR indicator depends very much on the objectives and purpose of the surveillance.

For example, when monitoring trends in humans using untreated sewage, the focus may be on detecting resistant pathogens that are of low prevalence in humans but of high public health relevance. In contrast, when evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention, indicators must be measurable at all times – even if the immediate public health relevance is of less importance. Of course, the indicator of choice is also dependent on the laboratory capacity present in the region, or whether qPCR or sequencing facilities are available or not.

Some studies on AMR in the environment measure genes using qPCR and metagenomics (such as WGS) rather than using culture techniques and quantifying live bacteria. Compared to human and animal surveillance, environmental research more often addresses specific ARGs or metagenomic analyses; however, if the surveillance activity is to support human or animal health, or if the aim is to integrate analyses from different surveillances, choosing an indicator that is meaningful for the human or animal health sectors often means considering culturing and counting bacteria as well.

A common indicator

E. coli is a common indicator of (animal or human) faecal contamination in water and soil (Anjum et al., 2021), and can also harbour ARGs.

The presence of resistant E. coli can be used as a proxy and indicates the presence of (faecal) resistant organisms from human or animal sources. It is also a good candidate for measuring the same microbe across the human, animal and environment sectors, as it is already an established AMR indicator in human and animal health. Because of this, methods for its isolation are often familiar and many protocols exist (Figure 11). On the other hand, focusing on just a single bacterium has the disadvantage that ARGs present in other species are overlooked. This means that analyses of E. coli are not representative of the whole bacterial community.

Described image
Figure 11 E. coli growing on MacConkey agar (a culture medium used to isolate Gram-negative rod bacteria such as E. coli).

Activity 8: Selecting indicators

Timing: Allow 20 minutes

In this activity you will extend the table that you started in Activity 7. An updated version of the table appears in this template  with an additional two columns.

Once you have copied in the information from the table in Activity 7, begin this activity by adding any possible AMR indicators that you can think of to the fourth column. Once you have done this, decide if you think these studies on AMR in the environment are suitable for regular surveillance or are research studies, and indicate your answer in the final column.

Discussion

Table 2 shows some possible objectives and indicators. However, your answers will depend on the compartments you have selected and the context that you are working in. Whether or not an indicator is useful for regular surveillance depends to a large extent on cost and the local laboratory testing capacity.

Table 2 Environmental compartments, study areas, objectives, AMR indicator(s) and suitability for regular surveillance (completed by the course authors)
Compartment Study area Objective(s) AMR indicator(s) Suitable for regular surveillance?
Raw sewage/untreated wastewater Pathogen of low prevalence with public health concern Determining trends (in humans) CPE, ESBL, VRE, fluoroquinolone resistant salmonella (indicators WHO bacterial pathogen list) Yes
Raw sewage/untreated wastewater Concerns about new forms of resistance Identifying emerging forms Resistance genes Yes
Untreated and treated wastewater Questions about wastewater treatment interventions Determining the efficacy of intervention E. coli, ESBL, ARGs Possible, but more suited to research study
Agricultural soil Concerns about dissemination of AMR by fertilising with manure Determining trends in AMR Resistance genes Yes
Drinking water Questions about treatment options Determining the efficacy of intervention Faecal indicators (E. coli) Yes – depending on the average drinking water quality, it might be more suited to research study
Drinking water Concerns about public health Producing data for risk assessment E. coli, ESBL Yes
River water Attribution of urban and agricultural sources to river concentrations; role of residues for selection of AMR Determining trends in AMR AMR indicators or residues Yes
Irrigation water (and irrigated crops) Questions about irrigations with wastewater Producing data for risk assessment/determining the efficacy of intervention E. coli, ESBL-producing E. coli Possibly, but more suited to research study
Air Concerns about occupational exposure of farmers Producing data for risk assessment MRSA, ARGs More suited to research study

9.1 Metrics of environmental AMR surveillance

10 Integrated surveillance