Thailand’s ASU programme

In contrast to Ghana’s NPAR, Thailand’s Antibiotics Smart Use (ASU) programme is an example of a policy that was started as a project from the community level rather than top-down, as described in Case Study 2.

Case Study 2: Thailand's ASU programme (adapted from ReAct, n.d. 2)

The start of the programme

The ASU programme started in 2007 as an action research project to promote rational AMU by strengthening human resources, improving health facility infrastructure and empowering communities.

Key stakeholders who initiated the ASU programme at the local level included physicians, pharmacists, nurses, health volunteers, local administrators and community leaders. They all promoted rational AMU in their various healthcare settings and communities.

The programme was taken to the national level via various community, local and provincial government structures, . However, the decentralised network with local ownership has remained in place, and has been considered crucial in maintaining sustainability – especially during financial and human resource constraints.

Integration into the national programme

The ASU programme was integrated into Thailand’s national programme to curb AMR, known as the Antimicrobial Resistance Containment Program (AMRCP), in 2012. The AMRCP was initiated in 2011 by a group of stakeholders with a shared vision of how to contain and prevent the emergence and spread of common antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections in Thailand with a One Health approach.

Becoming national policy

Having been scaled up to a national level, the ASU programme was first adopted into the Thai healthcare system’s Pay-for-Performance (P4P) policy. For close to a decade, Thai stakeholders committed to work on resistance at local and community levels without a national action plan (NAP). In 2017, a comprehensive national plan was developed, incorporating the ASU programme.

The National Strategic Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (2017–21) promotes multisectoral collaboration to reduce antimicrobial consumption and AMR morbidity, and improve public awareness. The ASU programme is part of the stewardship component.

Before 2007, rational use of medicines was a concept not routinely practiced in Thailand. Furthermore, there were very few resources in the fight against the irrational use of antibiotics.

The ASU programme is notable because it induced behavioural change with limited resources through a local approach; it had a clear, simple health message promoted by small teams of trained health educators creating local networks with local ownership that connect to central networks. The programme was scaled up to the entire country, where a pay-for-performance element was added.

You can read more about the ASU programme on the ReAct website (ReAct, n.d. 3).

Activity 2: Reflecting on influencing policy-making

Timing: Allow about 30 minutes
By signing in and enrolling on this course you can view and complete all activities within the course, track your progress in My OpenLearn Create. and when you have completed a course, you can download and print a free Statement of Participation - which you can use to demonstrate your learning.

Part B

Watch Video 2 and complete the sentences below.

Video 2 Evidence-informed policy (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016).
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).
Guest users do not have permission to interact with embedded questions.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

2 Understanding and identifying policy-makers