1.2 Impact of sample quality on testing and reporting of results

Not all samples received by a laboratory will be of high quality, that is, contaminant free and in sufficient quantity. Prior to starting the testing process, laboratory staff should be aware of potential quality issues relating to specific sample types that could lead to false results.

Specimen contamination

It is important to recognise that when samples are taken from most sites in the body, the environment is not sterile. This means that a mix of the following may be present:

  • Normal commensal flora: Bacteria (or other microorganisms) that are usually found at that location in or on the body, e.g. skin, genital region, mouth, etc. For example, normal flora are likely to be found on superficial swabs, genital swabs and in respiratory specimens.
  • Colonising organisms: Potentially pathogenic organisms not usually found at that part of the body, and may be displacing the commensal bacteria.
  • Contaminants: Microorganisms collected during specimen collection, e.g. from the patient, healthcare provider taking the sample or on the collection tube.

Blood and CSF are normally sterile; therefore any microorganisms found in samples taken from these parts of the body are likely to be the cause of an infection. However, if there is contamination of the sample during the process of collection, commensal bacteria may be isolated as a contaminant. Similarly, urine samples should also be sterile but are easily contaminated at the time of collection. These contaminants can grow in the sample, making interpretation of the culture results difficult.

Reducing contamination

Clinical staff can take several measures to improve the quality of the specimens they send to laboratories, either by reducing contamination through aseptic techniques and/or increasing the yield of true pathogens. For example, sterile containers and equipment should be used for sample collection, to avoid the introduction of contaminating organisms. Specimens need to be large enough to handle effectively and to minimise changes such as pH, drying out, etc., that may affect the viability of the organism concerned.

Some types of sample may require special treatment or have other considerations.

  • Sputum samples, for instance are very useful for diagnosing TB and are frequently sent to diagnose other respiratory tract infections. However, the results have to be considered carefully as the sample is likely to be contaminated with the commensal flora in the upper respiratory tract. Identifying all the organisms in a sputum sample will not help the diagnosis and takes up a lot of laboratory time and resources.
  • Blood cultures, which are important in diagnosing severe and/or bloodstream infections, are another sample type that is easily contaminated by the commensal flora of the skin. Even though the blood is taken carefully to minimise contamination and inoculated directly into blood culture media by the person taking the samples, contaminants will still sometimes be found. A video showing safe and accurate blood culture collection using ANTT [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] (The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 2019), shows how careful decontamination of the skin and bottles, plus aseptic technique can minimise sample contamination. Video 1 illustrates some of the key features of aseptic technique.
  • Urine samples need to be collected carefully in midstream, to help reduce contamination with the commensal flora in the genital region. The sample should be refrigerated if it cannot be processed immediately. Boric acid can be used as a preservative if this is not possible. Microscopy helps determine whether a urinary tract infection (UTI) is present before culturing by looking for pus cells which indicate inflammation/infection.
Download this video clip.Video player: Video 1 Aseptic technique
Copy this transcript to the clipboard
Print this transcript
Show transcript|Hide transcript
Video 1 Aseptic technique
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Laboratory staff also need to take care not to introduce contaminants into cultures. Good laboratory practice should be followed at all times.

Reporting results

After testing it is important to avoid reporting any additional organisms and instead focus only on the causative pathogen, if found. Correct reporting is needed to guide accurate treatment decisions and for surveillance purposes.

  • What might be the consequence if organisms of the commensal flora are reported in test results?

  • The reporting of commensal organisms in microbiology tests can lead to unnecessary or inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. For surveillance, it could make the results inaccurate.

1.1 Origins of samples

1.3 Transport, labelling and processing of samples