2.3 AMR surveillance and the ethics of privacy and confidentiality

Protecting the privacy and confidentiality of the personal information of the patient or individual participating in research is an important ethical consideration. Central databases that hold large amounts of personal data carry the risk of privacy violation. This is especially the case as more institutions embrace ‘big data’ technologies in healthcare. The use of big data in medical decision-making raises ethical considerations about the use of patient data or stored biological specimens (such as blood or tissue), especially without the informed consent of the subject.

Public health programmes can complicate the privacy of patient records. Ethical principles such as the right to privacy may conflict with the need to rapidly share surveillance data in the context of an outbreak or emergency. For example, it may be necessary to notify all hospitals in an area of an outbreak of an AMR infection without seeking permission from each affected patient for their data to be shared.

In surveillance, ethical lines can be blurred. Individuals have the right to expect that their information will not be shared or used other than directly for their care, but this may be overridden in the interests of the broader population.

Ethical guidance on the use of big data in healthcare is sparse. The WHO is leading an international effort to develop ethical guidance on the use of big data in public health [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] . Artificial intelligence algorithms can analyse large datasets of resistance patterns, patient information and other health-related data to identify trends; however, while AI offers powerful tools for AMR surveillance, it raises ethical concerns such as data privacy and potential bias in algorithms. The WHO has published guidelines relating to artificial intelligence (WHO, 2021). You should note, however, that this is an exceptionally fast-moving field and that these guidelines are likely to be updated regularly.

Activity 8: What would you do regarding historical blood specimens from patients?

Timing: Allow about 15 minutes

Imagine you are a researcher investigating resistance profiles in bacterial species commonly found in bloodstream infections. You work in a hospital and have access to the pathology laboratory, where many blood specimens from affected patients over the past five years are stored. Would you access the patient records and stored blood specimens without first seeking permission from the individuals?

To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Discussion

In justifying whether to use the blood specimen, did you consider everything you have so far learned in the course about the ethics of healthcare and medical research, the medical code of ethics, and the Declaration of Helsinki? You have learned that informed consent is an important aspect of research on human subjects, and that individuals have a right to privacy.

However, in some cases, routinely collected data can be used for research without seeking individual consent, especially when the research is of high public health importance. Many hospitals and research institutions will have ethical frameworks to help researchers determine whether they need patient consent before accessing the stored specimens and patient records.

2.2 Global impacts of AMR

3 The role of international legal frameworks in AMR