Oral or intravenous antimicrobial therapy

A clinically unstable patient may often initially require intravenous antimicrobial therapy. However, switching to oral therapy once they are improving has big advantages, and one relatively easily achievable AMS goal is ensuring this switch is made in a timely way when this is appropriate.

Switching could be built into the prospective audit and feedback approach, or the pharmacy might take responsibility for reminding clinicians of the need for reassessment if there is no electronic prescribing system to do this.

Now watch Video 3, which has been taken from a larger WHO course on AMS, and answer the following questions.

Copy this transcript to the clipboard
Print this transcript
Show transcript|Hide transcript
Video 3 Pharmacology of antimicrobials for clinicians (continued) (WHO, n.d. 3).
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).
  • Name as many benefits as you can of switching from IV to oral antimicrobial therapy.

  • You might have thought of:

    • decreasing costs
    • facilitating discharge
    • avoiding complications associated with indwelling intravenous catheters, including infection and clots.
  • What factors determine whether a patient is a candidate for a switch from IV to oral?

  • You might have suggested that the patient can be switched to oral antimicrobial therapy if:

    • they are eating or can tolerate food
    • they do not have any condition that affects their ability to absorb antimicrobials administered orally
    • their condition will respond to treatment with an antimicrobial that is orally bioavailable.

    Patients with endocarditis or meningitis should not be switched to oral antimicrobials.

Choice of antibiotic formulations