Unit 2: Communication and de-escalation strategies
Session 1: Understanding communication challenges

In Unit 1 you explored how neurodivergent traits can affect behaviour and how distress may present in policing environments.
This session builds on that understanding by helping you recognise when standard policing communication may no longer be effective, and when adapting your approach becomes necessary to reduce risk and prevent escalation.
When communication becomes a risk factor
In fast‑moving policing situations, communication is often:
- directive
- time‑pressured
- task‑focused.
For many neurodivergent individuals, especially under stress, this style can increase overload rather than resolve the situation.
When a person is struggling to process information, continuing to speak at the same pace, repeating commands more forcefully or adding new instructions can escalate distress.
The key skill at this stage is not changing what you want to achieve but recognising when how you communicate needs to shift.
Early signals that communication is breaking down
Building on the signs of distress you identified in Unit 1, the following behaviours often indicate that a person’s ability to process information is reducing in the moment:
- repeated questions or phrases
- delayed or absent responses
- confusion about simple or familiar instructions
- fixation on a single detail or task
- increasing silence, withdrawal or avoidance
These are decision points. They signal that continuing with standard communication may increase risk.
Overload and shutdown: a quick reminder
At this stage, it may help to briefly recall how overload and shutdown affect communication:
- Overload occurs when too much information is being processed at once.
- Shutdown occurs when the brain reduces communication as a form of protection.
In both cases the person is not choosing to disengage. Their capacity to respond is temporarily reduced.
Scenario: Delayed response during an ID check
You stop a man in his 20s outside a shop. He avoids eye contact, fidgets and repeats your request for ID. When you ask again, he goes silent and looks away.
Pause and reflect:
- Which behaviours here suggest communication difficulty rather than refusal?
- At what point would continuing to repeat the request increase stress?
- What does this moment tell you about the need to adjust your approach?
This scenario demonstrates how quickly an interaction can shift from routine to high‑risk if signs of overload or shutdown are missed.
What happens if we don’t adjust?
When communication breakdown isn’t recognised:
- distress can escalate unnecessarily
- cooperation may reduce rather than improve
- officers may feel pressure to assert control sooner
- opportunities to de‑escalate are lost.
Recognising this early gives you more options, not fewer.
In the next session you will learn practical communication strategies designed to:
- support information processing
- reduce emotional and sensory overload
- maintain control while improving understanding.
These are everyday tools you can use as soon as communication begins to break down.
Before moving on, take a moment to reflect.
Reflective activity
Using your learning journal, think about a recent interaction where communication felt strained or unproductive.
- What signs suggested the person may have been struggling to process information?
- Did your communication pace, wording or tone change – or stay the same?
- How might recognising these signs earlier have altered the interaction?
This reflection focuses on recognising the need to adapt, not judging past actions.
In the next session you will learn about how to communicate differently when a neurodivergent person is struggling to process information, or is overwhelmed by a situation.
