Templates & Worksheets

This section provides practical templates and worksheets to support your work across the course. You are encouraged to adapt them to your own style, while retaining their core structure, especially where they align with assessment expectations.

The templates are:

·        Template 1.1 – Research Plan Worksheet

·        Template 2.1 – Case Note / Case Analysis Template

·        Template 3.1 – Statutory Interpretation Worksheet

·        Template 4.1 – Methodology Justification Outline

·        Template 5.1 – Annotated Bibliography Template

·        Template 8.1 – Capstone Project Planning Sheet

You may wish to copy these into your own documents or create reusable digital forms.

3. Template 3.1 – Statutory Interpretation Worksheet (Module 3)

Use this for workshop exercises and for any piece of work involving detailed analysis of legislation.

A. Provision and Context

1.     Statute / instrument (full title and year):

2.     Section(s) or article(s) under consideration:

3.     Brief description of the legal context (what area of law / problem does this relate to?):

B. Text of the Provision

Copy or summarise the relevant text (or attach separately) and highlight key terms:

C. Breakdown into Elements

Identify the elements or conditions in the provision:

1.     Element 1 (e.g. conduct requirement):

2.     Element 2 (e.g. mental element, circumstances):

3.     Element 3 (e.g. defences or exceptions):

D. Internal Aids

List any internal aids that assist with interpretation:

·        Definitions section references:

·        Long/short title:

·        Preamble, if present:

·        Headings / sub‑headings:

·        Schedules:

E. External Aids (if applicable)

Note any external materials consulted:

·        Parliamentary debates / explanatory notes (with references):

·        Law reform commission reports:

·        International instruments being implemented:

·        Relevant case law interpreting this or similar provisions:

F. Interpretative Approaches

For any ambiguous or contested terms, record how different interpretative approaches might apply:

·        Literal approach – ordinary meaning:

·        Golden rule – would literal meaning lead to absurdity? If so, how might it be modified?

·        Mischief rule – what problem was the legislation intended to cure? How does that inform interpretation?

·        Purposive approach – what is the wider purpose of the statute or scheme? How should the provision be read to advance that purpose?

G. Application to Facts (Hypothetical or Real)

If you have a factual scenario:

1.     Briefly state the key facts:

2.     Apply each element of the provision to the facts, step by step:

·        Element 1:

·        Element 2:

·        Element 3:

3.     Identify any uncertainties or alternative interpretations and how a court might resolve them:

H. Provisional Conclusion

State, with reasons, your provisional conclusion on how the provision should be interpreted and applied to the facts: