Both articles were qualitative, but felt like opinion. Neither moved my central beliefs much, but they did help to clarify problems, results and progress. We are already in a situation where I suspect our academic system is gamed massively. I am not a fan of AI, but I am interested. So much so that last year I was doing L806 Linguistics and artificial intelligence, but I had problems with Jupyter Notebooks (again). They are not very disability riendly. I don't think AI should be in higher tasks, it should be replacing clerks, and then perhaps when it has advanced it may be useful doing the more humdrum in higher areas.