Acknowledgements


Authors: 

Tanja Zdolšek Draksler, PhD, Ana Fabjan, Alenka Guček, PhD, Matej Kovačič, PhD

Funding:

This work was done within the Horizon Europe project AI4Gov: Trusted AI for Transparent Public Governance fostering Democratic Values (Grant agreement ID: 101094905).

References:

1. AI4Gov - Trusted AI for Transparent Public Governance fostering Democratic Values (Horizon Europe project). Project web-page: AI4Gov | Trusted AI for Transparent Public Governance (ai4gov-project.eu)

2. AI4GOV Training Ljubljana 2023: AI and bias (bias in algorithms, bias in data)”, lecturer George Manias. Video lecture available at: link.

3. AI4GOV Training Ljubljana 2023: Fundamentals of AI”, lecturer Erik Novak.  Video lecture available at: link.

4. AI4GOV Training Ljubljana 2023: Hands on session: case studies on detecting bias. Followed by a panel discussion. Video lecture available at: link.

5. AI4GOV Training Ljubljana 2023: How is AI regulated?”, lecturer Federico Marengo. Video lecture available at: link.

6. AI4GOV Training Ljubljana 2023: Impact of bias on Human Rights (underrepresented groups)”, lecturer Mpampis Chatzimallis. Video lecture available at: link.

7. AI4GOV Training Ljubljana 2023: What is bias?”, lecturer Georgia Panagiotidou. Video lecture available at: link.  

8. AI4Gov. (2023). D2.1 - AI4Gov Holistic Regulatory Framework V1. link.

9. AI4Gov. (2023). D2.3 - Reference Architecture and Integration of AI4Gov Platform V1. link.

10. AI4Gov. (2023). D3.1 - Decentralized Data Governance, Provenance and Reliability V1. link.

11. AI4Gov. (2023). D4.1 - Trustworthy, Explainable, and unbiased AI V1. link.

12. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Delacorte Press.

13. Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183-186.

14. COMIC Volume 1: What is AI? (2021). From the comic series We Are AI | Comics. Available at: link.

15. COMIC Volume 2: Learning From Data. (2021). From the comic series We Are AI | Comics. Available at: link.  

16. COMIC Volume 3: Who lives, Who dies, Who decides? (2021). From the comic series We Are AI | Comics. Available at: link.  

17. COMIC Volume 4: All about that Bias. (2021). From the comic series We Are AI | Comics. Available at: link.

18. COMIC Volume 5: We are AI. (2021). From the comic series We Are AI | Comics. Available at: link.  

19. Cook, C., & Spray, C. (2012). Ecosystem services and integrated water resource management: different paths to the same end? Journal of environmental management, 109, 93100.

20. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5-21.

21. ENAR (2009-2021). Shadow reports by the European network against racism. link.

22. European Commission. (2019). AI Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG). Avialable at: link.

23. Coursera. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Terms: A to Z Glossary. link.

24. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychology Press.

25. Greenwald, A. G., & Krieger, L. H. (2006). Implicit bias: Scientific Foundations. California Law Review, 945-967.

26. Hamilton, D., & Gifford, R. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: a cognitive basis of stereotypic judgements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(4), PP. 392-407.

27. Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daume III, H., Dudik, M., & Wallach, H. (2019). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? In proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (PP. 1-16).

28. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. Handbook of social psychology, 2, 1122-1165.

29. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.

30. Kim, M. A. (2017). The impact of internet use on social isolation among older adults: an empirical analysis using panel data. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 20(7), 411-416.

31. Manias, G. et al., "AI4Gov: Trusted AI for Transparent Public Governance Fostering Democratic Values." (2023). 19th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Smart Systems and the Internet of Things (DCOSS-IoT), Pafos, Cyprus, 2023, pp. 548-555, doi: 10.1109/DCOSS-IoT58021.2023.00090.

32. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on psychological science, 5(4), PP. 420-430.

33. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), 175-220.

34. Nieto, S. (2000). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Allyn & Bacon.

35. OECD.AI (2021). What are the tools for implementing trustworthy AI? A comparative framework and database. link.

36. Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual review of sociology, 34, 181209.

37. Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: a field experiment. American sociological review, 74(5), PP. 777-799.

38. Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual review of psychology, 60, 339-367.

39. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(5), 751-783.

40. Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. (2019). Digital exclusion: An introduction. Routledge.

41. Rudman, L. A., & Ashmore, R.D. (2007). Discrimination and the implicit association test. Group processes & intergroup relations, 10(3), 359-372.

42. Schug, J., Alt, N., & Klauer, K. (2016). The psychological bases of discrimination and exclusion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 142(4), PP. 380-421.

43. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New media & society, 6(3), 341-362.

44. Smedley, B., Stith, A., & Nelson, A. (2003). Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academies Press.

45. Steele, C. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: and other clues to how stereotypes affect us (issues of our time). WW Norton & Company.

46. Sue, D., Rasheed, M., & Rasheed, J. (2016). Multicultural social work practice: A competency-based approach to diversity and social justice. John Wiley & Sons.

47. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232.

48. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty:  Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

49. UNDP (2021). Qualitative assessment of digital access and skills of underrepresented groups. link.

50. United Nations. (2020). Disability inclusion. link.

51. Van Dijk, J. A. (ED.). (2013). The digital divide (VOL. 14). Routledge.

52. Zamfir, A., & Corbos, R. A. (2015). Towards sustainable tourism development in urban areas: case study on Bucharest as tourist destination. Sustainability, 7(9), 12709-12722.