2.3.2 Identity and social behaviours
Digital optimists believe that anonymity online can give children the freedom to explore and engage with different identities and behaviour patterns. Digital pessimists worry that this may allow them to falsify their age, fabricate events or misrepresent themselves, either innocently or deviously.
Little is really known about how online and offline identities fit together. Palfrey and Gasser (2008) suggest that children do not distinguish between their ‘online’ and ‘offline’ identities. Increasingly, the identity of just about anyone living in a digital era is a synthesis of real-space and online expressions of self.
There are also constraints built into many social networks (Willett, 2009; Cánovas, 2014). Children may want to reinvent themselves to show maturation, but be undermined by photographs or activity on their friends’ online space.
What may be a greater concern is the amount of real information that children share online. Psychologists have developed what they call the ‘disclosure decision model’ to explain why older children often reveal so much information to others online. The underlying assumption is that people decide what personal information they will disclose, how they will disclose it and to whom they will disclose it, based on their evaluation of the possible rewards and risks. According to this model, the disclosure of personal information is intended to achieve certain benefits that might include social approval from others, intimacy or relief of distress.
You could read the an extract Born Digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives from Palfrey and Gasser, 2008.