This is certainly an interesting exercise, but as with all research, the real difficulties come not with the answers, but with the questions. Over-simplification for the purpose of tick-box science can produce some meaningless results. Take for instance the question of smoking being an inherited trait. We know that brain chemistry is significant in dependency, which it is reasonable to assume has some foundation in a person's genetic make up; but to separate smoking from any other addictive behaviour will undoubtedly skew the results. As one of 5 siblings myself, raised with 2 smoking parents, the twin study statistics would suggest that several of us would have become smokers. In fact, only 1 has. This 20% figure is significantly short of the expected statistic. Of course, this is what you would call 'anecdotal' evidence, but not having asked the wider question in the first place means that you are still only presenting further hypotheses, rather than true results with your research. It would be most helpful for people interested in this field to consider the eminent work of Dr Bruce Lipton on epigenetics, which would add a third dimension to this research and potentially yield some truly powerful insights into the balance of nature and nurture.
Unzip your genes - Debate the genetic influence on body weight
Join the discussion: How do we know that genes influence how much...
Join the discussion: How do we know that genes influence how much weight we gain, surely people differ in how much food they eat and how much they exercise?
- Duration: 5 mins
- Published on: Thursday 17th February 2011
- Introductory Level
- Posted under: Biology
How do we know that genes influence how much weight we gain, surely people differ in how much food they eat and how much they exercise?
Some researchers have investigated this question using some very clever study designs. One example of this is Professor Bouchard Jr who studied 12 pairs of identical twins. All twins consumed over 1000kcal per day for 100 days, and were not allowed to do intense physical exercise. After 100 days some participants only gained 4kg, while others gained as much as 13kg. The weight gain was much more similar within twin pairs than between pairs, suggesting that weight gain is partly influenced by our genetic make-up.
What do you think?
If this has sparked your interest, why not join in the discussion by posting a response in the Comments section below?














