Skip to content

A step too far? Body troubles, gendered lives

Posted under Sociology

Kath Woodward suggests that Rachida Dati's five-day maternity leave should probably be a cause for concern

22 Jan
2009

In sport athletes sometimes push themselves to the limits and beyond. Boxers still come out when they should probably stay in their corner and throw in the towel. Corporeal achievement is crucial, so perhaps it’s not surprising, even if damaged limbs and a whole season out or even a career destroyed are sometimes the outcome.

In other areas of experience, where bodily competition is not so central, it may be more difficult to comprehend the French justice minister Rachida Dati’s decisionto return to work only five days after giving birth by caesarian section. Perhaps, as an ambitious, successful woman of 43, she was anxious about showing any signs of weakness?

Rachida Dati Creative Commons Image by Ma Gali under CC-BY-NC-ND licence
Rachida Dati

It certainly made the papers and she did look stunning: a supreme embodied achievement. It was newsworthy, because most people don’t don 5 inch stiletto heels a few days after surgery, even if they have a reputation for wearing stunningly fashionable clothes and dressing impeccably in the day job. The tabloid press did focus on what she was wearing with some voyeuristic pleasure, for example the Daily Mail’s concern with her being ‘more glamorous than ever’.

More seriously, could it be the feminist concerns with women’s hard won rights to maternity leave being so flagrantly disregarded by a high flying successful woman in high office that make this an important matter to explore in the political public arena? As Madeleine Bunting noted in the Guardian, 'this is bad for her and bad for us too’.

As a public figure, Dati also has some responsibility and her actions have meanings about what is important for all of us. Dati’s actions make it clear that, not only are the rights that women have fought for to protect their physical well being as mothers, but also the relationship between the mother and her child which represents emotional intimacy, much less important than career success. Breastfeeding her baby and its accompanying intimacy will be very difficult under these circumstances, but although breastfeeding may be promoted by health professionals it occupies a very uneasy place in contemporary culture.

Bunting’s feminist political argument is countered by French claims that things are different across the channel, as Agnès Poirier argues. Poirier suggests that ‘French women view themselves as women first, mothers second’ and ‘don't see maternity as their sole raison d'être. You could call it feminism’. However, it is still more usually women who give birth and women who breastfeed. (A US woman who had her breasts removed, grew a small beard and became legally male as Thomas Beatie, subsequently gave birth very publicly as a man, albeit with a woman’s reproductive organs, apart from the excised mammary glands. The beard, like the shoes, may be a distraction).

There are, of course different feminisms, but Poirier’s version is somewhat disembodied with no recognition of the specificities or values of embodied experience. Resting after major surgery, accessing the legal and civil rights that are embedded in contemporary neoliberal governance and investing in emotional life do not constitute throwing in the towel or turning your back on competition and success.

Rate and share this page:

You haven't rated. Average rating 4.8 out of 5, based on 5 ratings

Share this page:

.

More like this

Comments

Login or Register to post comments

Post Your Comment

Comments on: "A step too far? Body troubles, gendered lives

Archive Comments

Michael has started a thread discussing A step too far? Body troubles, gendered lives.

Archive Comments

Interesting, very thought provoking. I wonder if this illustrates the tension between the individual and wider society. Surely feminism is - at least in part - about giving women equal rights and freedoms. But is it about giving equality to women as individuals or as a social group.

As an individual surely it is up to Ms Dati to choose to return to work when she so wishes. I have no idea whether her doctors felt her decision was a wise one from a health perspective, but even if they did feel it wasn't ideal again people can choose not to follow doctors advice (how many people hear their doctor tell them to loose weight or quit smoking but who don't..?)

And yet...

I can see the point of this blog is that if individual women decide not to make use of the maternity rights hard won over years then they are at least devalued if not put at risk. Years ago the idea of "sisterhood" was a strong theme of feminism, yet on "Women's Hour" phone-in recently there was a strong sense from younger callers that this idea of sisterhood meant nothing today.

Does rights for women to make their own decisions and choices over working (full time, part time, or not at all), fertility, and so on ultimately mean feminism has to accept when a women chooses to "betray" the sisterhood - whether by staying at home as a "housewife" or by returning to work within days of giving birth (be it a wise health decision or not).

Thoughts anyone?

Article Information

Publication details
Thursday, 22nd January 2009
Thursday, 22nd January 2009

Copyright information
• Body text - Copyrighted: The Open University
• Image 'Rachida Dati' - Creative-Commons: by Ma Gali under CC-BY-NC-ND licence

About OpenLearn

Hide

Explore

Try

Study

OU Courses

OpenLearn Now

Hide

Tag Clouds

Hide

Site Cloud

What are Tag Clouds?

My Cloud

Discover the latest about your passions - Sign In or Register and start a personal tag cloud.

What are Tag Clouds?
http://www.open.edu/openlearn/sites/all/themes/ole/flash/tagcloud.swf

Creative Commons License Except for third party materials and otherwise stated, content on this site is made available
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Licence

/openlearn/sites/all/themes/ole/