Skip to content
Society, Politics & Law

It’s a crying shame when Nobel laureates are exposed as sexist

Updated Thursday, 11th June 2015

Tim Hunt should have realised that his "light-hearted" comment about the "trouble with girls" was going to offend.

This page was published over five years ago. Please be aware that due to the passage of time, the information provided on this page may be out of date or otherwise inaccurate, and any views or opinions expressed may no longer be relevant. Some technical elements such as audio-visual and interactive media may no longer work. For more detail, see our Archive and Deletion Policy

Illustration of a male scientist getting flustered by a female scientist's ankles Creative commons image Icon Catherine Pain under Creative-Commons license I’m not sure whether I’m weeping tears of laughter or sorrow at the comments made by Nobel Laureate and English biochemist Tim Hunt. Poor man – he certainly has stirred up a storm of debate following his inadvised remarks about single-sex laboratories and women crying when criticised.

I say poor man, but I don’t really feel sorry for him. He should have known better. OK, it is important to have a sense of humour, and most people are able to laugh when someone makes a light-hearted joke at their expense. But there are limits, especially when addressing a group of people that you don’t know very well, who might have different social or cultural reference points. Someone as senior as Hunt should have realised that his remarks were going down like a lead balloon, and been able to change the tenor of his comments.

There are (at least) two aspects of Hunt’s remarks to take issue with. The first is about workplace relationships: “Let me tell you about my trouble with girls … in the lab … You fall in love with them, they fall in love with you". In saying this, he seems to be marking laboratories out as seething dens of sexual iniquity. [Humorous aside: chance would be a fine thing …].

OK, perhaps I’m exaggerating a bit – though I did meet my husband when we were sharing a laboratory as fellow PhD students. We celebrate our 29th wedding anniversary this year. Because of university administration cycles, for several years he was my boss, then I was his boss. We still work together, publish together and collaborate on a variety of projects. Sometimes, workplace romances can even serve as a source of inspiration rather than distraction.


Photograph of a man and lady in a lab discussing what they're seeing through their microscopes. The man is turned toward the lady pointing at her microscope whilst she looks at him. They are wearing blue gloves, white lab coats, hair nets and white face masks.

Thank god she’s covered up at least. wavebreakmedia/Shutterstock


But laboratories are certainly not the only workplaces in which colleagues form relationships. Indeed, workplace relationships are so commonplace that reports have been written about their effect (positive and negative) on the work environment. There is even a Wikipedia entry about the subject, which cites a number of references to academic papers.

Before the spread of online dating sites, the workplace was one of the main locations where partnerships formed. If we take Hunt’s comments to its logical conclusion, then all workplaces should be segregated on the basis of sex. Gosh, where does that leave consideration of our LGBT friends and colleagues?

Workplace bullying

Tim Hunt being interviewed Creative commons image Icon Paloma Baytelman under CC-BY-SA-2.0 licence under Creative-Commons license The second comment which deserves debate is the assertion that “women start crying when you criticise them”. As far as outrageous and outdated sexist comments go, this must be fairly close to the top. This to me is more serious.

I was reduced to tears following a reprimand – once. The person who criticised me was several years older, and several grades more senior. He was notorious for his bullying tactics. I was furious – with him, and also with myself for caring about what he had said. There is no excuse for being so destructive that a woman, or man, is reduced to tears.

If you know you have to deal with someone who doesn’t take criticism easily, then temper how you speak to them. That isn’t having to hold back, but is showing a sensitivity that will get much better results than boosting your own ego by causing someone to cry.

As far as I am aware, I have never reduced any of my colleagues to tears following a reprimand. And if I have, it was inadvertent and I apologise. There are much better and more effective managerial tools: praise, discussion, suggestion of alternative approaches to problem solving.

As others have pointed out, Hunt may be of a previous generation, where there were fewer women in senior positions. But that is not an excuse for his comments. I see from his biography that he is married to a fellow scientist. The biography does not say whether they were laboratory colleagues … I wonder what they’ll be discussing over the dinner table tonight.

The Conversation

Monica Grady is Professor of Planetary and Space Sciences at The Open University.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

This blog post is part of Society Matters. The blog seeks to inform, stimulate and challenge our understanding of this changing world and of our humbling role within it. Find out more about the blog and the team.
Want to know more about studying social sciences with The Open University? Visit the Social Sciences faculty site.

Please note: The opinions expressed in Society Matters posts are those of the individual authors, and do not represent the views of The Open University.





Related content (tags)

Copyright information

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?