Lesson 5.2: Care and resistance

View

In this topic, you will explore how care and mutual aid function as crucial infrastructures of resistance against ‘anti-gender’ mobilisation. Care is more than emotional support: it sustains movements, mitigates burnout, strengthens collective resilience, and challenges the hierarchies on which anti-gender attacks depend.

2. Friendships, solidarity, and safe spaces

Across Europe, friendships and alliances function as the emotional backbone of resistance

In Ireland, activists stressed that friendships formed during the 2015 Marriage Equality and 2018 abortion campaigns continue to sustain feminist and LGBTIQ+ organisations. Solidarity helps counter online harassment, keeps people safe, and prevents anti-trans narratives from gaining traction in key institutions.

In Germany, participants described withdrawing into supportive community ‘bubbles’ after online attacks. In the words of one participant:

The most important thing was the exchange with people who experienced the same things.

Others spoke of solidarity through shared anger and courage. As one participant put it:

I feel solidarity whenever I have the feeling that someone shares the same anger, the same resistance. (Resist Report on Germany, p. 17)

These networks provide affirmation and practical help when hostility intensifies. At the same time, participants noted tensions within movements — generational differences, uneven access to privilege, and disagreements around strategy. These internal dynamics illustrate that solidarity must be continually renewed and inclusive.

In Spain, Greece, Switzerland and other case studies, activists described ‘transfeminist and queer bubbles’ — chosen or necessary daily spaces that offer safety, calm, and joy amid hostility. These spaces not only protect wellbeing but allow political imagination to flourish. One participant from the case-study on Spain-Catalonia and Basque Country explained:

I’m more selective in the spaces I go to. It helps me in my day-to-day to be safer, calmer, and happier (p 12)

Some activists describe these ‘transfeminist bubbles’ as a chosen way of resistance, while others speak of them more as a ‘necessity’ rather than a choice, because ‘anti-gender’ politics pushes these limitations forward. As one activist in the Spanish case-study put it:

It’s not a choice. I need to live in a bubble (Spain Report, p. 12).

Still, these bubbles function as microcosms of resistance – places where rest, mutual recognition, and safety are treated as political priorities.