References
Camerer, C, Dreber, A, Forsell, E, Ho, T, Huber, J, Johannesson, M, Kirchler, M, Almenberg, J, Altmejd, A, Chan, T, Heikensten, E, Holzmeister, F, Imai, T, Isaksson, S, Nave, G, Pfeiffer, T, Razen, M, Wu, H (2016): Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in Economics. Science, 3 Mar 2016, Vol 351, Issue 6280, pp. 1433-1436.
Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1126/ science.aaf0918
Cova, F, Strickland, B, Abatista, A, (2021): Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12(1):9-44
Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/ 325216701_Estimating_the_Reproducibility_of_Experimental_Philosophy
Ebersole CR, Mathur MB, Baranski E, et al (2020): Many labs 5: Testing pre-data-collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2020;3(3):309-33
Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 2515245920958687
Ebersole C. R., Atherton O. E., Belanger A. L., Skulborstad H. M., Allen J. M., Banks J. B., … Nosek B. A. (2016): Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82.
Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.jesp.2015.10.012
Errington, T, Mathur, M, Soderberg, C, Denis, A, Perfito, N, Iorns, E, Nosek, B, (2021): Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology, eLife.
Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.7554/ eLife.71601
Fifethirtyeight.com: Hack your way to scientific glory (website)
Available at: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/ p-hacking/
FORRT (2024): Lesson plan 8: open data and qualitative research (lesson template with a CC-By Attribution 4.0 licence).
Available at: https://osf.io/ nyfqx
Hofstede, G. (1980): Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/ books/ about/ Culture_s_Consequences.html?id=Cayp_Um4O9gC&redir_esc=y
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Jr., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., Cemalcilar, Z., Chandler, J., Cheong, W., Davis, W. E., Devos, T., Eisner, M., Frankowska, N., Furrow, D., Galliani, E. M., . . . Nosek, B. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A ‘many labs’ replication project.Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152.
Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1027/ 1864-9335/ a000178
ManyGoats (2025): https://www.themanygoatsproject.com/
Open Science Collaboration (2015): Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Science, 349 aac4716.
Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1126/ science.aac4716
Silverstein, P. (2020): Evaluating the replicability and specificity of evidence for natural pedagogy theory
Available at: https://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/ portal/ en/ publications/ evaluating-the-replicability-and-specificity-of-evidence-for-natural-pedagogy-theory(39b30b8b-7701-45b9-9009-d2d43bd5a006).html
Silverstein, P., Gliga, T., Westermann, G., Parise, E.: Probing communication induced biases in preverbal infants: two replication attempts of Yoon, Johnson and CsibraInfant Behaviour and Development, 55, 77-87.
Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/ article/ pii/ S0163638318301474?via%3Dihub
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017): Constraints on Generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123-1128.
Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 1745691617708630
UNICEF Innocenti (2022): Evidence and Gap Map Research Briefs: UNICEF Strategic Plan 2018–2021 Goal Areas
Available at: https://www.unicef.org/ innocenti/ reports/ evidence-and-gap-map-research-briefs